• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018年芬兰酒精饮料销售法规改革后杂货店酒精饮料购买情况的变化:以芬兰酒精立法改革为例

Changes in alcohol purchases from grocery stores after authorising the sale of stronger beverages: The case of the Finnish alcohol legislation reform in 2018.

作者信息

Uusitalo Liisa, Nevalainen Jaakko, Rahkonen Ossi, Erkkola Maijaliisa, Saarijärvi Hannu, Fogelholm Mikael, Lintonen Tomi

机构信息

University of Helsinki, Finland.

Tampere University, Finland.

出版信息

Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Dec;39(6):589-604. doi: 10.1177/14550725221082364. Epub 2022 May 16.

DOI:10.1177/14550725221082364
PMID:36452445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9703366/
Abstract

The Finnish alcohol law was reformed in January 2018. The availability of alcoholic beverages in grocery stores increased as the legal limit for retail sales of alcoholic drinks was raised from 4.7% to 5.5% alcohol, and the requirement of production by fermentation was abolished. We analysed how the inclusion of strong beers, ciders, and ready-to-drink beverages in grocery stores was reflected in alcohol purchases, and how these changes differed by age, sex, level of education and household income. The study sample included 47,066 loyalty card holders from the largest food retailer in Finland. The data consisted of longitudinal, individual-level information on alcohol purchases from grocery stores, covering the time period between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018. The volumes of absolute alcohol during a calendar year from beers, ciders, ready-to-drink beverages, and in total, were calculated. Alcohol purchases in 2017 and 2018 were compared. There was no overall change in the total alcohol (0.04 [95% CI -0.03, 0.11] litres/year) or beer purchases (-0.05 [95% CI -0.11, 0.02] litres/year). Purchases of ready-to-drink beverages increased by 0.10 [95% CI 0.09, 0.11] litres/year (+ 84%). Total alcohol purchases increased in the three highest income groups, whereas they decreased in the two lowest groups ( for the interaction < 0.0001). The increased purchases of alcohol as ready-to-drink beverages were, on the average, compensated for by a decrease in purchases of other alcoholic beverages. Higher prices probably limited the purchases among lower income groups and younger consumers, while the increase was sharper in higher income groups.

摘要

芬兰的酒精法于2018年1月进行了改革。杂货店中酒精饮料的可获得性增加,因为酒精饮料零售的法定酒精含量上限从4.7%提高到了5.5%,并且取消了发酵生产的要求。我们分析了杂货店中烈性啤酒、苹果酒和即饮饮料的纳入如何反映在酒精购买上,以及这些变化在年龄、性别、教育水平和家庭收入方面有何不同。研究样本包括来自芬兰最大食品零售商的47,066名忠诚卡持有者。数据包括来自杂货店的酒精购买的纵向个体层面信息,涵盖2017年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间。计算了一历年中啤酒、苹果酒、即饮饮料以及总体的纯酒精量。比较了2017年和2018年的酒精购买情况。总酒精购买量(0.04 [95%置信区间 -0.03, 0.11]升/年)或啤酒购买量(-0.05 [95%置信区间 -0.11, 0.02]升/年)没有总体变化。即饮饮料的购买量增加了0.10 [95%置信区间 0.09, 0.11]升/年(增长84%)。三个最高收入群体的总酒精购买量增加,而两个最低收入群体的总酒精购买量减少(交互作用<0.0001)。即饮饮料酒精购买量的增加平均被其他酒精饮料购买量的减少所抵消。较高的价格可能限制了低收入群体和年轻消费者的购买量,而高收入群体的增长更为明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c48/9703366/321df3f8c566/10.1177_14550725221082364-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c48/9703366/48421da3ed4f/10.1177_14550725221082364-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c48/9703366/7bf5222293cb/10.1177_14550725221082364-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c48/9703366/321df3f8c566/10.1177_14550725221082364-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c48/9703366/48421da3ed4f/10.1177_14550725221082364-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c48/9703366/7bf5222293cb/10.1177_14550725221082364-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c48/9703366/321df3f8c566/10.1177_14550725221082364-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in alcohol purchases from grocery stores after authorising the sale of stronger beverages: The case of the Finnish alcohol legislation reform in 2018.2018年芬兰酒精饮料销售法规改革后杂货店酒精饮料购买情况的变化:以芬兰酒精立法改革为例
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Dec;39(6):589-604. doi: 10.1177/14550725221082364. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Who buys non-alcoholic beer in Finland? Sociodemographic characteristics and associations with regular beer purchases.在芬兰谁会购买无酒精啤酒?社会人口统计学特征以及与常规啤酒购买的关联。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Mar;113:103962. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103962. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
3
Alcohol expenditure in grocery stores and their associations with tobacco and food expenditures.杂货店的酒类支出及其与烟草和食品支出的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7096-3.
4
Impact of price promotion, price, and minimum unit price on household purchases of low and no alcohol beers and ciders: Descriptive analyses and interrupted time series analysis of purchase data from 70, 303 British households, 2015-2018 and first half of 2020.价格促销、价格和最低单位价格对英国家庭购买低酒精度和无酒精啤酒和苹果酒的影响:基于 2015-2018 年和 2020 年上半年 70303 户英国家庭购买数据的描述性分析和中断时间序列分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113690. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113690. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
Healthiness of foods and non-alcoholic beverages according to store type: A population-based study of household food and drink purchases in New Zealand.根据商店类型划分的食品和非酒精饮料的健康程度:一项基于新西兰家庭食品和饮料购买情况的人群研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Mar 28;14:100784. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100784. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Effect of increasing the price of sugar-sweetened beverages on alcoholic beverage purchases: an economic analysis of sales data.提高含糖饮料价格对酒精饮料购买量的影响:基于销售数据的经济分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Apr;72(4):324-330. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209791. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
7
The dynamics in food selection stemming from price awareness and perceived income adequacy: a cross-sectional study using 1-year loyalty card data.源于价格意识和感知收入充足性的食物选择动态:一项使用1年忠诚度卡数据的横断面研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 May;119(5):1346-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
8
Longitudinal trends in produce purchasing behavior: a descriptive study of transaction level data from loyalty card households.纵向研究农产品购买行为:基于会员卡家庭交易水平数据的描述性研究。
Nutr J. 2022 Nov 8;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12937-022-00814-9.
9
Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.智利 2014 年含糖饮料税与含糖饮料价格和购买量的变化:城市环境下的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002597. eCollection 2018 Jul.
10
Retailer-Led Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Price Increase Reduces Purchases in a Hospital Convenience Store in Melbourne, Australia: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.零售商主导的含糖饮料提价减少了澳大利亚墨尔本一家医院便利店内的购买量:一项混合方法评估。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jun;118(6):1027-1036.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.367. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Shopping Data for Population Health Surveillance: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.用于人群健康监测的购物数据:机遇、挑战与未来方向。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 6;27:e75720. doi: 10.2196/75720.
2
The impacts of policies controlling the spatial availability of take-away alcohol on consumption and harms: A systematic narrative review.控制外卖酒精饮料空间可得性的政策对消费及危害的影响:一项系统性叙述性综述。
Addiction. 2025 Oct;120(10):1951-1969. doi: 10.1111/add.70070. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
3
Assessing the early influence of COVID-19 in an analysis of the immediate implementation of Minimum Pricing for Alcohol on drinkers in Wales.

本文引用的文献

1
The case for minimum unit prices on alcohol in South Africa.南非实行酒精饮料最低单价制的理由。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Jun 30;111(7):680-684. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i7.15430.
2
Evaluating the impact of minimum unit pricing (MUP) on off-trade alcohol sales in Scotland: an interrupted time-series study.评估最低单位定价 (MUP) 对苏格兰非贸易酒类销售的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2697-2707. doi: 10.1111/add.15478. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
The early impact of Scotland's minimum unit pricing policy on alcohol prices and sales.
在对威尔士饮酒者立即实施酒精最低限价的分析中评估新冠疫情的早期影响。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2024 Feb;41(1):57-74. doi: 10.1177/14550725231202066. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
4
Habits, consumption and public control.习惯、消费与公共管控。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Dec;39(6):587-588. doi: 10.1177/14550725221136364. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
苏格兰最低单位定价政策对酒类价格和销售的早期影响。
Health Econ. 2020 Dec;29(12):1637-1656. doi: 10.1002/hec.4156. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
Grocery purchase data in the study of alcohol use - A validity study.研究饮酒行为的杂货店购买数据——一项有效性研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Sep 1;214:108145. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108145. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
5
Characterization and Correction of Bias Due to Nonparticipation and the Degree of Loyalty in Large-Scale Finnish Loyalty Card Data on Grocery Purchases: Cohort Study.芬兰大规模购物忠诚卡数据中因未参与及忠诚度导致的偏差特征与校正:队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 15;22(7):e18059. doi: 10.2196/18059.
6
Do alcohol control policies work? An umbrella review and quality assessment of systematic reviews of alcohol control interventions (2006 - 2017).酒精控制政策是否有效?对 2006-2017 年酒精控制干预措施系统评价的伞式审查和质量评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0214865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214865. eCollection 2019.
7
Alcohol Consumption and the Physical Availability of Take-Away Alcohol: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of the Days and Hours of Sale and Outlet Density.饮酒与外带酒的实际可得性:销售天数和时间及销售点密度的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Jan;79(1):58-67.
8
Pricing as a means of controlling alcohol consumption.定价作为控制酒精消费的一种手段。
Br Med Bull. 2017 Sep 1;123(1):149-158. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldx020.
9
Alcohol: taking a population perspective.酒精:从人口角度看问题。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul;13(7):426-34. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.70. Epub 2016 May 18.
10
Price elasticity of on- and off-premises demand for alcoholic drinks: A Tobit analysis.酒精饮料店内和店外需求的价格弹性:一项托比特分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163:222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Apr 25.