Suppr超能文献

酒精控制政策是否有效?对 2006-2017 年酒精控制干预措施系统评价的伞式审查和质量评估。

Do alcohol control policies work? An umbrella review and quality assessment of systematic reviews of alcohol control interventions (2006 - 2017).

机构信息

Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0214865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214865. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2010 World Health Organization Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol recommends countries adopt evidence-based interventions.

AIM

To update, summarize, and appraise the methodological rigour of systematic reviews of selected alcohol control interventions in the Strategy.

METHODS

We searched for systematic reviews across PUBMED, EMBase and The Cochrane Library in 2016 and updated in 2017 with no language limits. Two investigators independently in duplicate conducted screening, eligibility, data extraction, and quality assessment using the ROBIS tool. We categorised interventions according to the WHO recommendations, and rated reviews as at high, low or unclear risk of bias. We applied a hierarchical approach to summarising review results. Where overlap existed we report results of high quality reviews and if none existed, by most recent date of publication. We integrated the ROBIS rating with the results to produce a benefit indication.

RESULTS

We identified 42 systematic reviews from 5,282 records. Almost all eligible reviews were published in English, one in German and one in Portuguese. Most reviews identified only observational studies (74%; 31/42) with no studies from low or lower-middle income (LMIC) countries. Ten reviews were rated as low risk of bias. Methodological deficiencies included publication and language limits, no duplicate assessment, no assessment of study quality, and no integration of quality into result interpretation. We evaluated the following control measures as possibly beneficial: 1) community mobilization; 2) multi-component interventions in the drinking environment; 3) restricting alcohol advertising; 4) restricting on- and off-premise outlet density; 5) police patrols and ignition locks to reduce drink driving; and 6) increased price and taxation including minimum unit pricing.

CONCLUSIONS

Robust and well-reported research synthesis is deficient in the alcohol control field despite the availability of clear methodological guidance. The lack of primary and synthesis research arising from LMIC should be prioritised globally.

摘要

背景

2010 年世界卫生组织全球减少有害饮酒战略建议各国采用基于证据的干预措施。

目的

更新、总结和评估该战略中选定的酒精控制干预措施的系统评价方法学严谨性。

方法

我们于 2016 年在 PUBMED、EMBase 和 The Cochrane Library 中搜索了系统评价,并于 2017 年进行了更新,不限制语言。两名调查员独立重复进行筛选、资格评估、数据提取和质量评估,使用 ROBIS 工具。我们根据世界卫生组织的建议对干预措施进行分类,并对综述进行高、低或不确定偏倚风险评估。我们采用分层方法总结综述结果。如果存在重叠,我们报告高质量综述的结果,如果不存在,则按最近的出版日期报告。我们将 ROBIS 评分与结果相结合,以产生获益指示。

结果

我们从 5282 条记录中确定了 42 篇系统评价。几乎所有符合条件的综述均为英文发表,其中一篇为德文,一篇为葡萄牙文。大多数综述仅确定了观察性研究(74%;31/42),没有来自低收入和中低收入国家(LMIC)的研究。10 篇综述被评为低偏倚风险。方法学缺陷包括出版和语言限制、未进行重复评估、未评估研究质量以及未将质量纳入结果解释。我们评估了以下控制措施可能有益:1)社区动员;2)饮酒环境中的多组分干预;3)限制酒精广告;4)限制有许可证和无许可证销售点密度;5)警察巡逻和点火锁以减少酒后驾车;6)提高价格和税收,包括最低单位定价。

结论

尽管有明确的方法学指南,但在酒精控制领域,稳健且报告良好的研究综合仍然不足。应优先在全球范围内开展来自中低收入国家的初级和综合研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/6457561/064ba22e241f/pone.0214865.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验