• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人轻度智力障碍工作绩效评估土耳其语版的心理测量特性评估。

Evaluation of psychometric properties of Turkish version of assessment of work performance among adults with mild intellectual disabilities.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

Leibniz Instute for Educational Trajectories, National Foundation for Educational Research, Slough, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Mar;36(2):281-288. doi: 10.1111/jar.13057. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1111/jar.13057
PMID:36453017
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment of work performance (AWP) is a test for assessing work performance and can be utilised in matching person-work and applying effective interventions. It was aimed to adjust and to evaluate the validity and reliability of AWP in Turkish with individuals with mild intellectual disability (ID).

METHODS

The study was conducted with 243 individuals with mild ID. Of the 243 participants, data gathered from 105 individuals was used to conduct exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and remaining data (138 individuals) was used to conduct confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency, construct validity, test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity and inter-rater reliability were analyzed.

RESULTS

The AWP showed average to good reliability for individuals with mild ID. The construct validity and internal consistency of the AWP were confirmed with satisfying results; test-retest reliability (ICC >0.92) and inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.90) were excellent for all domains. The EFA resulted three factors, explaining 66.46% variance; and CFA resulted average fit.

CONCLUSION

AWP is valid and reliable for evaluating the working performances of individuals with mild ID.

摘要

背景

工作绩效评估(AWP)是一种评估工作绩效的测试方法,可用于人员与工作的匹配和实施有效的干预措施。本研究旨在对土耳其语版 AWP 进行调整,并评估其在轻度智力障碍(ID)个体中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

该研究共纳入 243 名轻度 ID 个体。在这 243 名参与者中,105 名参与者的数据用于进行探索性因子分析(EFA),其余 138 名参与者的数据用于进行验证性因子分析。分析包括内部一致性、结构效度、重测信度、效标关联效度和评分者间信度。

结果

AWP 在轻度 ID 个体中表现出中等至良好的可靠性。AWP 的结构效度和内部一致性得到了满意的验证结果;所有领域的重测信度(ICC>0.92)和评分者间信度(ICC>0.90)均非常优秀。EFA 结果显示有三个因素,解释了 66.46%的方差;CFA 结果显示为中等拟合。

结论

AWP 可有效可靠地评估轻度 ID 个体的工作表现。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of psychometric properties of Turkish version of assessment of work performance among adults with mild intellectual disabilities.成人轻度智力障碍工作绩效评估土耳其语版的心理测量特性评估。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Mar;36(2):281-288. doi: 10.1111/jar.13057. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
Development and initial psychometric properties of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale-Intellectual Disability version.《沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表-智力残疾版本的开发与初步心理测量学特性》。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2023 Sep;67(9):893-900. doi: 10.1111/jir.13039. Epub 2023 May 2.
3
Validation of the Chinese version of the dementia screening questionnaire for individuals with intellectual disabilities (DSQIID-CV).智障人士痴呆筛查问卷中文版(DSQIID-CV)的验证
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 Apr;59(4):385-95. doi: 10.1111/jir.12173. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
4
A Multicentre Italian Validation Study in Aging Adults with Down Syndrome and Other Forms of Intellectual Disabilities: Dementia Screening Questionnaire for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities.一项针对患有唐氏综合征及其他智力障碍形式的老年成年人的意大利多中心验证研究:智力障碍者痴呆筛查问卷
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(7):709-721. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170117094757.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of a Turkish Version of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ-Turkish).工作康复问卷(WORQ-土耳其语版)的土耳其语版本的跨文化调适、信度和效度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Jun;31(2):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09917-8.
6
Cultural adaptation and Turkish version of Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities in individuals with spinal cord injury: a reliability and validity study.脊髓损伤个体中身体残疾者身体活动量表的文化适应及土耳其语版本:一项信效度研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(21):6414-6423. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1964624. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
Vestibular activities and participation measure: Turkish validity and reliability.前庭活动和参与测量:土耳其语的有效性和可靠性。
J Vestib Res. 2022;32(4):367-372. doi: 10.3233/VES-210094.
8
Development and psychometric properties of the Clinical Anxiety Scale for People with Intellectual Disabilities (ClASP-ID).《智障人士临床焦虑量表(ClASP-ID)的编制及心理测量学特性》。
J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Jul 27;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09554-9.
9
Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of the German Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI).跨文化调适与心理计量评估的德国颅面疼痛和残疾量表 (CF-PDI)。
Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):E857-E866.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the child oral impacts on daily performances (C-OIDP) for use in Turkish primary school children: a cross sectional validation study.儿童口腔健康相关生活质量问卷中文版在土耳其小学生中的信度和效度评价:一项横断面验证研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01162-y.