Ligita Titan, Francis Karen, Wicking Kristin, Harvey Nichole, Nurjannah Intansari
School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia.
College of Healthcare Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart Tasmania, Australia.
Nurse Res. 2022 Dec 7;30(4):31-38. doi: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1851. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
Interviewing is a vital and common method of collecting data in qualitative research. The interview is usually recorded and a written transcription is created from the recording. The transcription document is then analysed by reading and re-reading to fracture the data and develop initial codes, as in grounded theory methodology. However, this method has disadvantages.
To report on how the authors used the process of generating initial codes during their analysis in a research study.
The authors compare the rigour and efficiency of generating initial codes from reading written transcripts with generating initial codes from listening to recordings. The most notable difference between the two methods is the length of time needed to transcribe the recording before coding can start. The authors discuss the lessons they learned from their pragmatic decision to expedite initial coding by listening to rather than reading the interview data.
Grounded theory requires concurrent data generation and analysis. Audio analysis is efficient in developing initial codes from interview recordings.
Nurse researchers can use the audio method of analysing interview data.
访谈是定性研究中收集数据的重要且常用方法。访谈通常会被录音，并根据录音生成书面文字记录。然后，如同扎根理论方法那样，通过反复阅读文字记录文档来分析数据，以拆分数据并生成初始编码。然而，这种方法存在缺点。
报告作者在一项研究的分析过程中是如何生成初始编码的。
作者比较了从阅读书面文字记录生成初始编码和从听录音生成初始编码的严谨性和效率。两种方法最显著的差异在于开始编码前转录录音所需的时间长度。作者讨论了他们从务实决定中吸取的经验教训，即通过听而非阅读访谈数据来加快初始编码。
扎根理论要求同时进行数据生成和分析。音频分析在从访谈录音中生成初始编码方面效率很高。
护士研究人员可以使用音频方法来分析访谈数据。
