• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂的费用分担额与心力衰竭患者药物填充之间的关联。

Association Between Copayment Amount and Filling of Medications for Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure.

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Cardiology) New York University School of Medicine New York NY.

Department of Population Health New York University School of Medicine New York NY.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027662. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027662. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.027662
PMID:36453634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9798787/
Abstract

Background Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) reduce mortality and hospitalization for patients with heart failure. However, relatively high copayments for ARNI may contribute to suboptimal adherence, thus potentially limiting their benefits. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective cohort study within a large, multi-site health system. We included patients with: ARNI prescription between November 20, 2020 and June 30, 2021; diagnosis of heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%; and available pharmacy or pharmacy benefit manager copayment data. The primary exposure was copayment, categorized as $0, $0.01 to $10, $10.01 to $100, and >$100. The primary outcome was prescription fill nonadherence, defined as the proportion of days covered <80% over 6 months. We assessed the association between copayment and nonadherence using multivariable logistic regression, and nonbinarized proportion of days covered using multivariable Poisson regression, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and neighborhood-level covariates. A total of 921 patients met inclusion criteria, with 192 (20.8%) having $0 copayment, 228 (24.8%) with $0.01 to $10 copayment, 206 (22.4%) with $10.01 to $100, and 295 (32.0%) with >$100. Patients with higher copayments had higher rates of nonadherence, ranging from 17.2% for $0 copayment to 34.2% for copayment >$100 (<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, odds of nonadherence were significantly higher for copayment of $10.01 to $100 (odds ratio [OR], 1.93 [95% CI, 1.15-3.27], =0.01) or >$100 (OR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.63-4.18], <0.001), as compared with $0 copayment. Similar associations were seen when assessing proportion of days covered as a proportion. Conclusions We found higher rates of not filling ARNI prescriptions among patients with higher copayments, which persisted after multivariable adjustment. Our findings support future studies to assess whether reducing copayments can increase adherence to ARNI and improve outcomes for heart failure.

摘要

背景

血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)可降低心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率。然而,ARNI 的较高共付额可能导致用药依从性不佳,从而限制其获益。

方法和结果

我们在一个大型多地点医疗系统中开展了一项回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了以下患者:2020 年 11 月 20 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间处方 ARNI;诊断为心力衰竭或左心室射血分数≤40%;且有药房或药房福利管理共付额数据。主要暴露因素为共付额,分为 0 美元、0.01 美元至 10 美元、10.01 美元至 100 美元和>100 美元。主要结局是处方填服不依从,定义为 6 个月内的用药天数覆盖比例<80%。我们使用多变量逻辑回归评估共付额与不依从的关联,并使用多变量泊松回归评估非二进制的用药天数覆盖比例,调整了人口统计学、临床和社区水平的协变量。共有 921 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 192 名(20.8%)的共付额为 0 美元,228 名(24.8%)的共付额为 0.01 美元至 10 美元,206 名(22.4%)的共付额为 10.01 美元至 100 美元,295 名(32.0%)的共付额>100 美元。共付额较高的患者不依从率更高,0 美元共付额的不依从率为 17.2%,>100 美元共付额的不依从率为 34.2%(<0.001)。多变量调整后,10.01 美元至 100 美元(比值比[OR],1.93[95%置信区间[CI],1.15-3.27],=0.01)或>100 美元(OR,2.58[95%CI,1.63-4.18],<0.001)的共付额与不依从的相关性具有统计学意义,与 0 美元共付额相比。当评估用药天数覆盖比例作为比例时,也观察到了类似的关联。

结论

我们发现共付额较高的患者未开具 ARNI 处方的比例较高,多变量调整后仍存在这种情况。我们的研究结果支持未来的研究,以评估降低共付额是否可以提高 ARNI 的用药依从性并改善心力衰竭患者的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae37/9798787/57b8805b5d94/JAH3-11-e027662-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae37/9798787/e4245c6d20a5/JAH3-11-e027662-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae37/9798787/c75d9ffdfbe1/JAH3-11-e027662-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae37/9798787/57b8805b5d94/JAH3-11-e027662-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae37/9798787/e4245c6d20a5/JAH3-11-e027662-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae37/9798787/c75d9ffdfbe1/JAH3-11-e027662-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae37/9798787/57b8805b5d94/JAH3-11-e027662-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Association Between Copayment Amount and Filling of Medications for Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure.抗血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂的费用分担额与心力衰竭患者药物填充之间的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027662. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027662. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
Relationship Between Hospital Characteristics and Early Adoption of Angiotensin-Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor Among Eligible Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.医院特征与心力衰竭住院患者中血管紧张素受体/脑啡肽酶抑制剂早期应用的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 5;8(3):e010484. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010484.
3
Combined Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism and Neprilysin Inhibition.血管紧张素受体拮抗剂与中性内肽酶抑制剂联合使用
Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1115-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018622.
4
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial.射血分数对沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的疗效及预后的影响:ARNI与ACEI对心力衰竭全球死亡率和发病率影响的前瞻性比较(PARADIGM-HF)试验
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;9(3):e002744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002744.
5
Effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors on left atrial remodeling and prognosis in heart failure.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂对心力衰竭患者左心房重构及预后的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):667-675. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13691. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
6
Association Between Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation and Health Status Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者健康状况结局的相关性。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;7(11):933-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
7
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor for Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Real-World Experience From Taiwan.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者:来自台湾的真实世界经验
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar;25(2):152-157. doi: 10.1177/1074248419872958. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
8
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors First Strategy Improve Decongestion in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction When Compared to Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor First Strategy.与血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂优先策略相比,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂优先策略可改善症状性心力衰竭且射血分数降低患者的充血情况。
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2023 Apr 27;28(4):81. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2804081.
9
Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial.血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与标准治疗相比用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的估计 5 年治疗需要人数,以预防心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院:来自 PARADIGM-HF 试验的数据分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1226-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3957.
10
Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Real-world experience from Turkey (ARNi-TR).血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的真实世界研究:来自土耳其的经验(ARNi-TR)。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2021 Jul;49(5):357-367. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2021.63099.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder perspectives on facilitators and barriers to implementing a zero-dollar copay program for chronic conditions study.利益相关者对实施慢性病零自付计划的促进因素和障碍的看法研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5.
2
Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Primary Adherence of Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.健康的社会决定因素对新诊断房颤患者口服抗凝剂初始依从性的影响
Cardiol Ther. 2025 Mar;14(1):53-69. doi: 10.1007/s40119-024-00395-0. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
3
Lessons to to for Optimizing Heart Failure Medications.

本文引用的文献

1
Relation of Household Income to Access and Adherence to Combination Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure: A Retrospective Analysis of Commercially Insured Patients.家庭收入与心力衰竭患者使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦的机会和依从性的关系:一项商业保险患者的回顾性分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Jul;15(7):e009179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009179. Epub 2022 May 13.
2
Sacubitril/Valsartan Adherence and Postdischarge Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心力衰竭住院患者中的依从性及出院后结局
JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;9(12):876-886. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
优化心力衰竭药物治疗的经验教训。 (你提供的原文“Lessons to to for”表述有误,推测正确表述可能是“Lessons for” ,以上是基于修正后进行的翻译)
JACC Adv. 2024 May 8;3(7):100960. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100960. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Association between visit frequency, continuity of care, and pharmacy fill adherence in heart failure patients.心力衰竭患者就诊频率、连续性护理与药房配药遵从性的关系。
Am Heart J. 2024 Jul;273:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
5
Sacubitril/valsartan compared to equivalent/sub-equivalent dose angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与等效/低剂量血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的比较:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Aug;80(8):1113-1120. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03686-6. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
6
Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status and Prescription Fill Patterns Among Patients With Heart Failure.社区层面的社会经济地位与心力衰竭患者的处方配药模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47519.
7
Cohort profile: a large EHR-based cohort with linked pharmacy refill and neighbourhood social determinants of health data to assess heart failure medication adherence.队列资料简介:一项基于大型电子健康记录的队列研究,与药房配药记录和邻里健康决定因素数据相链接,用于评估心力衰竭药物治疗依从性。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):e076812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076812.
Prior Authorization, Copayments, and Utilization of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Medicare and Commercial Plans in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.
心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者在医疗保险和商业计划中使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦的预先授权、共同支付和利用情况。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Sep;14(9):e007665. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007665. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
4
Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation and Postdischarge Adherence Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠在心力衰竭住院患者中的起始应用和出院后用药依从性。
J Card Fail. 2021 Aug;27(8):826-836. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.03.012.
5
Copayment Reduction Voucher Utilization and Associations With Medication Persistence and Clinical Outcomes: Findings From the ARTEMIS Trial.共付额降低代金券的使用及其与药物持续性和临床结局的关联:来自ARTEMIS试验的结果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 May;13(5):e006182. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006182. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Navigating the Wild West of Medication Adherence Reporting in Specialty Pharmacy.专科药房用药依从性报告的乱象。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Oct;25(10):1073-1077. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.10.1073.
7
Assessment of National Coverage and Out-of-Pocket Costs for Sacubitril/Valsartan Under Medicare Part D.医疗保险部分 D 下沙库巴曲缬沙坦的国家覆盖范围和自付费用评估。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):828-830. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2223.
8
Prescription Drug Spending and Medication Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Heart Failure.医疗保险受益人心力衰竭患者的处方药支出和药物依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jun;25(6):705-713. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.6.705.
9
Improving the accuracy of medication adherence measures using linked prescription and dispensation data: findings from the ESOSVAL cohort of patients treated with osteoporosis drugs.利用处方和配药数据进行关联来提高药物依从性测量的准确性:来自接受骨质疏松症药物治疗的 ESOSVAL 队列患者的研究结果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Sep;35(9):1535-1544. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1601944. Epub 2019 May 10.
10
Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The CHAMP-HF Registry.射血分数降低的心力衰竭的药物治疗:CHAMP-HF 注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):351-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.070.