• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

银屑病关节炎的 10 项首要研究重点:詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系。

The top 10 research priorities in psoriatic arthritis: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Aug 1;62(8):2716-2723. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac676.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keac676
PMID:36453848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10393438/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify and prioritize the top 10 research questions for PsA.

METHODS

The British Psoriatic Arthritis Consortium (BritPACT) formed a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) comprising of people living with PsA, carers and clinicians, supported by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). This PSP followed the established three-stage JLA process: first, an online survey of people living with PsA, carers and clinicians to identify PsA questions, asking, 'What do you think are the most important unanswered questions in psoriatic arthritis research?' The questions were checked against existing evidence to establish 'true uncertainties' and grouped as 'indicative questions' reflecting the overarching themes. Then a second online survey ranked the 'true uncertainties' by importance. Finally, a workshop including people living with PsA and clinician stakeholders finalized the top 10 research priorities.

RESULTS

The initial survey attracted 317 respondents (69% people living with PsA, 15% carers), with 988 questions. This generated 46 indicative questions. In the second survey, 422 respondents (78% people living with PsA, 4% carers) prioritized these. Eighteen questions were taken forward to the final online workshop. The top unanswered PsA research question was 'What is the best strategy for managing patients with psoriatic arthritis including non-drug and drug treatments?' Other top 10 priorities covered diagnosis, prognosis, outcome assessment, flares, comorbidities and other aspects of treatment (https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk).

CONCLUSION

The top 10 priorities will guide PsA research and enable PsA researchers and those who fund research to know the most important questions for people living with PsA.

摘要

目的

确定并确定最优先考虑的 10 个 PsA 研究问题。

方法

英国银屑病关节炎联合会(BritPACT)成立了一个优先事项设定伙伴关系(PSP),由患有 PsA 的患者、护理人员和临床医生组成,由詹姆斯林德联盟(JLA)提供支持。该 PSP 遵循既定的 JLA 三阶段流程:首先,对患有 PsA 的患者、护理人员和临床医生进行在线调查,以确定 PsA 问题,询问“您认为银屑病关节炎研究中最重要的未解决问题是什么?”这些问题与现有证据进行了核对,以确定“真正的不确定性”,并将其分组为反映总体主题的“指示性问题”。然后,第二个在线调查对“真正的不确定性”进行了重要性排名。最后,包括患有 PsA 的患者和临床医生利益相关者的研讨会最终确定了前 10 项研究重点。

结果

最初的调查吸引了 317 名受访者(69%为患有 PsA 的患者,15%为护理人员),收到了 988 个问题。这产生了 46 个指示性问题。在第二次调查中,422 名受访者(78%为患有 PsA 的患者,4%为护理人员)对这些问题进行了优先排序。有 18 个问题被带到了最终的在线研讨会。未解决的 PsA 研究的首要问题是“治疗银屑病关节炎患者(包括非药物和药物治疗)的最佳策略是什么?”其他前 10 项重点包括诊断,预后,结果评估,发作,合并症和其他治疗方面(https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk)。

结论

前 10 项重点将指导 PsA 研究,并使 PsA 研究人员和研究经费的提供者了解对患有 PsA 的患者最重要的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4405/10393438/92f5d6765f60/keac676f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4405/10393438/2e1124efd265/keac676f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4405/10393438/92f5d6765f60/keac676f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4405/10393438/2e1124efd265/keac676f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4405/10393438/92f5d6765f60/keac676f1.jpg

相似文献

1
The top 10 research priorities in psoriatic arthritis: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.银屑病关节炎的 10 项首要研究重点:詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Aug 1;62(8):2716-2723. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac676.
2
Research priorities in foot and ankle conditions: results of a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.足部和踝关节疾病的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟合作的优先事项设定结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 16;13(5):e070641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070641.
3
Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership.探索合作中确定卫生研究重点的挑战:对詹姆斯·林德联盟压疮重点确定合作项目所采用方法的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 2;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y. eCollection 2016.
4
Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery.确定心脏外科学术研究重点:成人心脏外科学术重点制定合作研究组的报告。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038001.
5
Dementia priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance: using patient and public involvement and the evidence base to inform the research agenda.与詹姆斯·林德联盟合作开展的痴呆症研究优先级设定:利用患者和公众参与以及证据基础为研究议程提供信息。
Age Ageing. 2015 Nov;44(6):985-93. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv143.
6
Top 10 research priorities for digital technology for adolescents and young persons with inflammatory bowel disease: Results of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.青少年和年轻炎症性肠病患者数字技术研究重点 10 项:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系的结果。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024 Mar;78(3):670-676. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12105. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
7
Research priorities in pernicious anaemia: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.恶性贫血研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 24;12(8):e065166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065166.
8
Research priorities for liver glycogen storage disease: An international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.肝糖原贮积病的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项确定合作项目
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020 Mar;43(2):279-289. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12178. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis.调整詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定流程以更好地支持患者参与:来自囊性纤维化的一个例子。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Aug 20;5:24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0159-x. eCollection 2019.
10
A patient-clinician James Lind Alliance partnership to identify research priorities for hyperemesis gravidarum.患者与临床医生詹姆斯·林德联盟合作确定妊娠剧吐的研究重点。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):e041254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041254.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and factors associated with osteoporosis, falls and fractures in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease: a scoping review.慢性炎症性风湿性疾病患者骨质疏松症、跌倒和骨折的流行病学及相关因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e096226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096226.
2
Understanding Patient Priorities for Psoriatic Disease Research.了解银屑病疾病研究中患者的优先事项。
J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2025 Jul 15:24755303251361816. doi: 10.1177/24755303251361816.
3
Psoriatic Arthritis Priority Setting Partnership: patient- and clinician-informed considerations for future UK health service delivery.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of screening questionnaires to identify psoriatic arthritis in a primary-care population: a cross-sectional study.在初级保健人群中比较用于识别银屑病关节炎的筛查问卷:一项横断面研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Sep;175(3):542-8. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14604. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
2
Qualifying unmet needs and improving standards of care in psoriatic arthritis.明确银屑病关节炎中未满足的需求并提高护理标准。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Dec;66(12):1759-66. doi: 10.1002/acr.22404.
3
Prevalence of rheumatologist-diagnosed psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis in European/North American dermatology clinics.
银屑病关节炎优先事项设定合作项目:患者与临床医生共同参与的关于英国未来医疗服务提供的考量因素
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jul 1;64(7):4335-4340. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae680.
4
Unmet Needs in Spondyloarthritis: Pathogenesis, Clinical Trial Design, and Nonpharmacologic Therapy.脊柱关节炎未满足的需求:发病机制、临床试验设计和非药物治疗。
J Rheumatol. 2024 Dec 1;51(12):1254-1258. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0939.
5
Increased physical activity promotes skin clearance, improves cardiovascular and psychological health, and increases functional capacity in patients with psoriasis.增加身体活动可促进银屑病患者的皮肤清除,改善心血管和心理健康,并提高功能能力。
Skin Health Dis. 2024 Aug 9;4(5):e426. doi: 10.1002/ski2.426. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Early psoriatic arthritis: when is the right time to start advanced therapy?早期银屑病关节炎:何时是开始进阶治疗的合适时机?
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Jul 27;16:1759720X241266727. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241266727. eCollection 2024.
7
High prevalence of radiographic erosions in early, untreated PsA: results from the SpARRO cohort.早期未经治疗的银屑病关节炎中存在高比例的放射学侵蚀:来自 SpARRO 队列的结果。
RMD Open. 2024 Apr 5;10(2):e003841. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003841.
8
Optimising psoriatic arthritis therapy with immunological methods to increase standard evaluation: the protocol of an open-label multicentre, parallel-group, two-arm randomised controlled study evaluation precision medicine approach in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.采用免疫学方法优化银屑病关节炎治疗以提高标准评估:一项开放性标签、多中心、平行组、双臂随机对照研究评估精准医学方法治疗银屑病关节炎的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 28;13(9):e078539. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078539.
在欧洲/北美皮肤科诊所中,银屑病患者被风湿病学家诊断为银屑病关节炎的患病率。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Nov;69(5):729-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.023. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
4
Time for a 'joint' approach?是时候采取“联合”方法了吗?
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Apr;168(4):683-4. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12170. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
5
Cardiovascular and other comorbidities in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a comparison with patients with psoriasis.银屑病关节炎患者的心血管及其他合并症:与银屑病患者的比较。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Dec;63(12):1729-35. doi: 10.1002/acr.20627.
6
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.研究证据生产与报告过程中可避免的浪费。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1341-1345. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d.
7
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with psoriasis: a hospital-based case-control study.银屑病患者代谢综合征的患病率:一项基于医院的病例对照研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Jul;157(1):68-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07986.x. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
8
Cardiovascular risk profile of patients with spondylarthropathies, particularly ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.脊柱关节炎患者,尤其是强直性脊柱炎和银屑病关节炎患者的心血管风险概况。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Dec;34(3):585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.07.010.
9
The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials.詹姆斯·林德联盟:患者和临床医生应共同确定他们对临床试验的优先事项。
Lancet. 2004;364(9449):1923-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17494-1.