• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者使用他拉唑帕利的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of talazoparib for patients with locally advanced or metastasized breast cancer in Germany.

机构信息

University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.

German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278460. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0278460
PMID:36454738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9714746/
Abstract

This study evaluated factors that influence the cost-effectiveness of talazoparib, particularly for patients with a germline breast-cancer-gene-(brca)-mutation and locally advanced or metastasized breast cancer within the context of the German healthcare system. We constructed a partitioned survival model to compare medical costs and treatment effectiveness for patients with such cancers over 45 months. Transition probabilities were derived from survival data from a randomized Phase-III EMBRACA trial, utilities based on published reports, and costs in Euros, which included costs for drug acquisition, clinical monitoring, and treatment of adverse events. Willingness-to-pay thresholds were set to be multiples of the current German per capita gross domestic product. Treatment with talazoparib led to a gain of 0.32 life-years (0.22 quality-adjusted life-years). The mean total cost of €84,003 for talazoparib and €12,741 for standard therapy resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €223,246 per life-year and €323,932 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, indicating that talazoparib is unlikely to be cost-effective at current pricing.

摘要

本研究评估了影响他拉唑帕利成本效益的因素,特别是在德国医疗体系下,对于携带种系乳腺癌基因(BRCA)突变的局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者。我们构建了一个分割生存模型,以比较此类癌症患者在 45 个月内的医疗成本和治疗效果。转移概率源自随机 III 期 EMBRACA 试验的生存数据、基于已发表报告的效用值以及以欧元计价的成本,其中包括药物获取、临床监测和不良事件治疗的成本。意愿支付阈值设定为当前德国人均国内生产总值的倍数。使用他拉唑帕利治疗可获得 0.32 年的生命(0.22 年质量调整生命)。他拉唑帕利的平均总成本为 84003 欧元,标准治疗的平均总成本为 12741 欧元,导致每例生命年增量成本效益比为 223246 欧元,每例质量调整生命年增量成本效益比为 323932 欧元,表明按现行价格,他拉唑帕利不太可能具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b1/9714746/1bd9dae13dd7/pone.0278460.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b1/9714746/6f983903b7cf/pone.0278460.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b1/9714746/8aa5216a34e2/pone.0278460.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b1/9714746/1bd9dae13dd7/pone.0278460.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b1/9714746/6f983903b7cf/pone.0278460.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b1/9714746/8aa5216a34e2/pone.0278460.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b1/9714746/1bd9dae13dd7/pone.0278460.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of talazoparib for patients with locally advanced or metastasized breast cancer in Germany.德国局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者使用他拉唑帕利的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278460. eCollection 2022.
2
Cost-effectiveness of talazoparib for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in China and the US.中国和美国 BRCA1/2 种系突变的 HER2 阴性晚期乳腺癌患者使用他拉唑帕尼的成本效益分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 17;14(1):13935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64343-7.
3
Cost-utility of talazoparib monotherapy treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Spain.西班牙局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者使用他拉唑帕尼单药治疗的成本效用分析
Breast. 2021 Aug;58:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
4
Talazoparib in Patients with a Germline BRCA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analyses from the Phase III EMBRACA Trial.在携带胚系 BRCA 突变的晚期乳腺癌患者中使用他拉唑帕尼:来自 III 期 EMBRACA 试验的详细安全性分析。
Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e439-e450. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0493. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA Mutation.他拉唑帕尼治疗携带有胚系 BRCA 突变的晚期乳腺癌患者。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 23;379(8):753-763. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802905. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Ribociclib plus Letrozole Versus Palbociclib plus Letrozole and Letrozole Monotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A U.S. Payer Perspective.来曲唑联合瑞博西利与来曲唑联合帕博西利及来曲唑单药治疗激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性的绝经后晚期或转移性乳腺癌的成本-效果分析:美国支付者视角。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jun;24(6):514-523. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.514.
7
Talazoparib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation Enrolled in Asian Countries: Exploratory Subgroup Analysis of the Phase III EMBRACA Trial.在亚洲国家入组的 HER2 阴性晚期乳腺癌和胚系 BRCA1/2 突变患者中,他拉唑帕利对比化疗:III 期 EMBRACA 试验的探索性亚组分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;53(4):1084-1095. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.1381. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Talazoparib versus chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from the EMBRACA trial.他拉唑帕尼与化疗治疗胚系BRCA1/2突变的HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者:EMBRACA试验的最终总生存结果
Ann Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(11):1526-1535. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2098. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Comparative cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Germany and the United States.卡博替尼作为二线治疗药物用于德国和美国晚期肝细胞癌患者的成本效果比较。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 21;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01241-y.
10
Quality of life with talazoparib versus physician's choice of chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutation: patient-reported outcomes from the EMBRACA phase III trial.在晚期乳腺癌和胚系 BRCA1/2 突变患者中,与医生选择的化疗相比,使用他拉唑帕利的生活质量:来自 EMBRACA Ⅲ期试验的患者报告结局。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;29(9):1939-1947. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy257.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in second-line and third-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in Germany.德国Lu-PSMA-617放射性配体疗法用于转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)二线和三线治疗的成本效益分析
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07317-9.
2
Direct and Indirect Costs of Breast Cancer and Associated Implications: A Systematic Review.乳腺癌的直接和间接成本及其相关影响:系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jul;41(7):2700-2722. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02893-y. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
3
Correction: Cost-effectiveness of talazoparib for patients with locally advanced or metastasized breast cancer in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-utility of talazoparib monotherapy treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Spain.西班牙局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者使用他拉唑帕尼单药治疗的成本效用分析
Breast. 2021 Aug;58:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Outcomes in Clinically Relevant Patient Subgroups From the EMBRACA Study: Talazoparib vs Physician's Choice Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy.EMBRACA研究中临床相关患者亚组的结果:他拉唑帕尼对比医生选择的标准化疗。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Oct 21;4(1):pkz085. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz085. eCollection 2020 Feb.
3
Cost-effectiveness of niraparib, rucaparib, and olaparib for treatment of platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian carcinoma.
更正:德国局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者使用他拉唑帕尼的成本效益
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0303776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303776. eCollection 2024.
尼拉帕利、鲁卡帕利和奥拉帕利治疗铂耐药复发性卵巢癌的成本效果分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;157(2):500-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
Talazoparib in Patients with a Germline BRCA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analyses from the Phase III EMBRACA Trial.在携带胚系 BRCA 突变的晚期乳腺癌患者中使用他拉唑帕尼:来自 III 期 EMBRACA 试验的详细安全性分析。
Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e439-e450. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0493. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
PARP inhibitors: a tsunami of indications in different malignancies.PARP抑制剂:不同恶性肿瘤适应症的海啸。
Pharmacogenomics. 2020 Feb;21(3):221-230. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2019-0113.
6
Neoadjuvant Talazoparib for Patients With Operable Breast Cancer With a Germline Pathogenic Variant.新辅助 Talazoparib 治疗携致病性种系突变的可手术乳腺癌患者。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):388-394. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01304. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
New drugs: where did we go wrong and what can we do better?新药:我们错在哪里,如何才能做得更好?
BMJ. 2019 Jul 10;366:l4340. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4340.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Niraparib and Olaparib as Maintenance Therapy for Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.尼拉帕利和奥拉帕利作为铂类敏感复发性卵巢癌维持治疗的成本效益。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Dec;24(12):1219-1228. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.12.1219.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Niraparib Versus Routine Surveillance, Olaparib and Rucaparib for the Maintenance Treatment of Patients with Ovarian Cancer in the United States.尼拉帕利对比常规监测、奥拉帕利和鲁卡帕利用于美国卵巢癌维持治疗的成本效益研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Mar;37(3):391-405. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0745-z.
10
Quality of life with talazoparib versus physician's choice of chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutation: patient-reported outcomes from the EMBRACA phase III trial.在晚期乳腺癌和胚系 BRCA1/2 突变患者中,与医生选择的化疗相比,使用他拉唑帕利的生活质量:来自 EMBRACA Ⅲ期试验的患者报告结局。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;29(9):1939-1947. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy257.