• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价工具包:保持对支持证据综合工具的更新。

The Systematic Review Toolbox: keeping up to date with tools to support evidence synthesis.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

NIHR Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 1;11(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02122-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-022-02122-z
PMID:36457048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9713957/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Systematic Review (SR) Toolbox was developed in 2014 to collate tools that can be used to support the systematic review process. Since its inception, the breadth of evidence synthesis methodologies has expanded greatly. This work describes the process of updating the SR Toolbox in 2022 to reflect these changes in evidence synthesis methodology. We also briefly analysed included tools and guidance to identify any potential gaps in what is currently available to researchers.

METHODS

We manually extracted all guidance and software tools contained within the SR Toolbox in February 2022. A single reviewer, with a second checking a proportion, extracted and analysed information from records contained within the SR Toolbox using Microsoft Excel. Using this spreadsheet and Microsoft Access, the SR Toolbox was updated to reflect expansion of evidence synthesis methodologies and brief analysis conducted.

RESULTS

The updated version of the SR Toolbox was launched on 13 May 2022, with 235 software tools and 112 guidance documents included. Regarding review families, most software tools (N = 223) and guidance documents (N = 78) were applicable to systematic reviews. However, there were fewer tools and guidance documents applicable to reviews of reviews (N = 66 and N = 22, respectively), while qualitative reviews were less served by guidance documents (N = 19). In terms of review production stages, most guidance documents surrounded quality assessment (N = 70), while software tools related to searching and synthesis (N = 84 and N = 82, respectively). There appears to be a paucity of tools and guidance relating to stakeholder engagement (N = 2 and N = 3, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The SR Toolbox provides a platform for those undertaking evidence syntheses to locate guidance and software tools to support different aspects of the review process across multiple review types. However, this work has also identified potential gaps in guidance and software that could inform future research.

摘要

背景

系统评价(SR)工具包于 2014 年开发,用于整理可用于支持系统评价过程的工具。自成立以来,证据综合方法的范围大大扩大。这项工作描述了 2022 年更新 SR 工具包的过程,以反映证据综合方法的这些变化。我们还简要分析了包含的工具和指南,以确定当前可用于研究人员的工具和指南中存在的任何潜在差距。

方法

我们于 2022 年 2 月手动提取了 SR 工具包中包含的所有指南和软件工具。一位审阅者使用 Microsoft Excel 从 SR 工具包中包含的记录中提取和分析信息,第二位审阅者检查了一部分记录。使用这个电子表格和 Microsoft Access,更新了 SR 工具包,以反映证据综合方法的扩展和进行的简要分析。

结果

更新后的 SR 工具包于 2022 年 5 月 13 日推出,其中包含 235 个软件工具和 112 个指南文件。关于审查家族,大多数软件工具(N=223)和指南文件(N=78)适用于系统审查。然而,适用于综述评论的工具和指南文件较少(N=66 和 N=22),而定性评论的指南文件较少(N=19)。就审查制作阶段而言,大多数指南文件围绕质量评估(N=70),而软件工具则与搜索和综合(N=84 和 N=82)相关。似乎缺乏与利益相关者参与相关的工具和指南(N=2 和 N=3)。

结论

SR 工具包为从事证据综合的人员提供了一个平台,可用于查找支持多种类型的审查过程不同方面的指南和软件工具。然而,这项工作还确定了指南和软件中可能存在的潜在差距,这可以为未来的研究提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b690/9713957/8d7016174c4c/13643_2022_2122_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b690/9713957/aa7e78b1453c/13643_2022_2122_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b690/9713957/ab59f1226833/13643_2022_2122_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b690/9713957/8d7016174c4c/13643_2022_2122_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b690/9713957/aa7e78b1453c/13643_2022_2122_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b690/9713957/ab59f1226833/13643_2022_2122_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b690/9713957/8d7016174c4c/13643_2022_2122_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Systematic Review Toolbox: keeping up to date with tools to support evidence synthesis.系统评价工具包:保持对支持证据综合工具的更新。
Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 1;11(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02122-z.
2
Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis.用于医学系统文献综述的基于网络的软件工具:系统检索与特征分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 May 2;10(5):e33219. doi: 10.2196/33219.
3
What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.对于开展医疗保健干预措施综述的研究者,有哪些可用的指南?一项范围综述和定性元总结。
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;5(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5.
4
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools.使用自动化技术进行映射练习,以制定搜索策略来识别系统评价工具。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Nov;14(6):874-881. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1665. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
5
Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.机器学习计算工具辅助系统评价的实施:一项映射综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01805-4.
6
Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.系统评价实施、报告、出版和评价方法的指南:范围综述方案。
F1000Res. 2021 Aug 13;10:802. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.55108.1. eCollection 2021.
7
How to structure Microsoft Excel documents for systematic reviews.如何构建用于系统评价的 Microsoft Excel 文档。
Nurse Res. 2023 Mar 8;31(1):40-46. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1866. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review.综述的指南不断积累,但仍存在重要挑战:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01509-0.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing, and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review.系统综述的实施、报告、发表和评价方法及指南:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 14;12(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02396-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A database to initiate methodological advances in the evaluation of transitivity assumption in network meta-analysis: qualitative features and limitations of the tracenma R package.一个用于推动网络荟萃分析中传递性假设评估方法进展的数据库:tracenma R包的定性特征和局限性
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02634-x.
2
The searchbuildR shiny app: A new implementation of the objective approach for search strategy development in systematic reviews.searchbuildR闪亮应用程序:系统评价中搜索策略制定目标方法的新实现。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Jun 11;2(6):e12078. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12078. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis.健康指南制定者对自动化在健康证据综合中的使用的看法。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 8;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01569-2.
2
Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.生活系统评价的可行性和可接受性:一项混合方法评估的结果。
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 14;8(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1248-5.
3
Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements.
Machine learning for accelerating screening in evidence reviews.
用于加速循证综述筛查的机器学习。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Jul 20;1(5):e12021. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12021. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Digital Tools to Support the Systematic Review Process: An Introduction.支持系统评价过程的数字工具:简介
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70100. doi: 10.1111/jep.70100.
5
The Perspective on Secondary Research Practices: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.二次研究实践的视角:一项横断面分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;13(8):927. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080927.
6
Artificial Intelligence as a New Research Ally? Performing AI-Assisted Systematic Literature Reviews in Health Economics.人工智能会成为新的研究伙伴?开展健康经济学领域的人工智能辅助系统文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jun;43(6):647-650. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01481-4. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
7
Publicly available continuously updated topic specific databases of randomised clinical trials: A scoping review.公开可用的随机临床试验特定主题持续更新数据库:一项范围综述。
medRxiv. 2024 Nov 18:2024.11.18.24317477. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.18.24317477.
8
Usability of the "Systematic Review Support" computer system: a methodological study."Systematic Review Support" 计算机系统的可用性:一项方法学研究。
9
: a large language model that generates search queries for systematic reviews.一个为系统评价生成搜索查询的大语言模型。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Sep 25;7(3):ooae098. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae098. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
(Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review.(半)自动化方法在社会科学系统评价和荟萃分析中的数据提取:一项正在进行的综述。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 26;13:664. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.151493.1. eCollection 2024.
满足审稿人需求:探索审稿类型及相关信息检索要求。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Sep;36(3):202-222. doi: 10.1111/hir.12276.
4
The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research.对预后研究进行系统评价的需求日益增加:促进评价产生及提高原始研究质量的策略
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Jan 23;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0049-6. eCollection 2019.
5
Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews.用于描述利益相关者参与系统评价的ACTIVE框架的开发。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Oct;24(4):245-255. doi: 10.1177/1355819619841647. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
6
Development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in people with intermediate hyperglycaemia.血糖中度升高人群中2型糖尿病的发生
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 29;10(10):CD012661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012661.pub2.
7
Protease activity as a prognostic factor for wound healing in venous leg ulcers.蛋白酶活性作为下肢静脉溃疡伤口愈合的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 1;9(9):CD012841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012841.pub2.
8
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.我应该进行什么样的系统评价?医学和健康科学系统评价者的建议分类法和指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4.
9
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
10
Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015.文献研究表明,1999 年至 2015 年间发表的网络荟萃分析的统计方法得到了改进。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 15.