Schwartz Gabriel L, Jahn Jaquelyn L, Geller Amanda
UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, 490 Illinois St, Floor 7, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
The Ubuntu Center on Racism, Global Movements, & Population Health Equity, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, 3600 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Nov 17;20:101292. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101292. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Police contact is increasingly recognized as an adverse childhood experience and determinant of poor mental health. While targeting of LGBTQ sex and community spaces by law enforcement has a long precedent in US history-and while LGBTQ people continue to protest unfair police treatment-little population-level research has examined police contact disparities by sexual orientation or gender identity. We test whether sexual minority (SM) youth have higher risk of police contact through young adulthood. We analyze a nationally representative cohort of >15,000 US young adults who were in middle/high school in the mid-1990s, with police contact histories collected at age 18-25. Using four different, equally reasonable approaches to coding youth-reported sexual orientation, we identified ∼500-1900 SMs. Compared to heterosexual youth, SM youth had 1.86 times the odds of ever being stopped by police (95% CI = 1.56-2.22, p < 0.001), were stopped 1.60 times as often (CI = 1.38-1.86, p < 0.001), and were stopped at younger ages (survival time ratio = 0.91, CI = 0.88-0.93, p < 0.001). Inequities were particularly driven by SM women, among whom disparities were severe (ever stopped OR = 2.18, stop count ratio = 2.44, survival time ratio = 0.87). For men, inequities only emerged once a broad definition of SM was adopted, suggesting that young SM men who do not identify as LGB (or who are reticent to report themselves as such) may be at particular risk. Results were robust to adjustment for race/ethnicity and parental nativity, though small cells meant models stratified by race/ethnicity were underpowered. Given substantially heightened police contact among SM youth (particularly, young SM women), care providers and educators working with them should explicitly combat homophobic and criminal legal system stigma and screen for police contact and its psychological sequelae. More data on LGBTQ communities' criminal legal system contact throughout life is essential for preventing the causes and consequences of related sexual orientation-based health inequities.
与警方接触越来越被视为一种不良童年经历和心理健康不佳的决定因素。虽然执法部门针对 LGBTQ 性取向群体和社区空间的行为在美国历史上由来已久,而且 LGBTQ 群体也一直在抗议警方的不公平对待,但很少有针对总体人群的研究考察过按性取向或性别认同划分的与警方接触的差异。我们测试了性少数群体(SM)青年在成年早期与警方接触的风险是否更高。我们分析了一个具有全国代表性的队列,该队列中有超过 15000 名美国青年,他们在 20 世纪 90 年代中期处于初中/高中阶段,并收集了他们在 18 - 25 岁时与警方接触的历史记录。我们使用四种不同但同样合理的方法对青少年报告的性取向进行编码,识别出了约 500 - 1900 名性少数群体。与异性恋青年相比,性少数群体青年被警方拦截的几率是异性恋青年的 1.86 倍(95%置信区间 = 1.56 - 2.22,p < 0.001),被拦截的频率是异性恋青年的 1.60 倍(置信区间 = 1.38 - 1.86,p < 0.001),而且被拦截时的年龄更小(生存时间比 = 0.91,置信区间 = 0.88 - 0.93,p < 0.001)。不平等现象在性少数群体女性中尤为突出,她们之间的差异非常严重(曾被拦截的比值比 = 2.18,拦截次数比 = 2.44,生存时间比 = 0.87)。对于男性而言,只有采用宽泛的性少数群体定义时不平等现象才会显现,这表明那些不认同自己为女同性恋、男同性恋或双性恋(LGB)(或者不愿如此报告自己)的年轻性少数群体男性可能面临特别的风险。尽管小样本量意味着按种族/族裔分层的模型效力不足,但在对种族/族裔和父母出生地进行调整后,结果依然稳健。鉴于性少数群体青年(尤其是年轻的性少数群体女性)与警方的接触大幅增加,与他们合作的护理人员和教育工作者应明确抵制恐同和刑事法律系统的污名化,并筛查与警方接触情况及其心理后遗症。更多关于 LGBTQ 群体一生当中与刑事法律系统接触情况的数据对于预防基于性取向的相关健康不平等的成因和后果至关重要。