Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Dec;10(6):2861-2871. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01463-8. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
Despite evidence of racialized and socioeconomic inequities in tobacco and alcohol outlet availability, few studies have investigated spatial inequities in areas experiencing both concentrated residential racialized segregation and socioeconomic disadvantage. This study examined whether segregation-racialized, economic or both-was associated with alcohol and tobacco retailer counts in North Carolina (NC).
The NC Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission provided lists of 2021 off-premise alcohol retailers. We created a list of 2018 probable tobacco retailers using ReferenceUSA. We calculated three census tract-level measures of the Index of Concentrations at the Extremes (ICE), indicating racialized segregation between non-Hispanic White and Black residents and economic segregation based on household income. We used negative binomial regression to test associations between quintiles of each ICE measure and tobacco and, separately, alcohol retailer counts.
Tracts with the greatest racialized disadvantage had 38% (IRR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.66) and 65% (IRR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.34-2.04) more tobacco and alcohol outlets, respectively, as tracts with the lowest. Tracts with the highest racialized economic disadvantage had a predicted count of 1.51 tobacco outlets per 1000 people while those in the lowest had nearly one fewer predicted outlet. Similar inequities existed in the predicted count of alcohol outlets.
Tobacco and alcohol outlet availability are higher in NC places experiencing concentrated racialized and economic segregation. A centralized agency overseeing tobacco and alcohol outlet permits and strategies to reduce the retail availability of these harmful products (e.g., capping the number of permits) are needed to intervene upon these inequities.
尽管有证据表明烟草和酒类销售点的供应存在种族和社会经济不平等现象,但很少有研究调查同时经历集中居住的种族隔离和社会经济劣势的地区的空间不平等现象。本研究调查了在北卡罗来纳州(NC),隔离(种族、经济或两者兼有)是否与酒类和烟草零售商的数量有关。
NC 酒精饮料控制委员会提供了 2021 年场外酒精零售商名单。我们使用 ReferenceUSA 创建了 2018 年可能的烟草零售商名单。我们计算了三个普查区层面的极端集中指数(ICE)指标,这些指标表示非西班牙裔白人和黑人居民之间的种族隔离以及基于家庭收入的经济隔离。我们使用负二项回归来检验每个 ICE 指标的五分位数与烟草以及分别与酒类零售商数量之间的关联。
种族隔离程度最大的地区的烟草零售商数量分别多 38%(IRR,1.38;95% CI,1.15-1.66)和 65%(IRR,1.65;95% CI,1.34-2.04),而种族隔离程度最低的地区的烟草零售商数量则分别少 38%和 65%。种族隔离程度最高的地区的预测烟草零售商数量为每 1000 人 1.51 个,而种族隔离程度最低的地区的预测烟草零售商数量则接近少 1 个。在预测的酒类零售商数量方面也存在类似的不平等现象。
在 NC 经历集中的种族和经济隔离的地方,烟草和酒类销售点的供应更多。需要一个集中的机构来监管烟草和酒类销售点的许可证,并采取策略来减少这些有害产品的零售供应(例如,限制许可证数量),以干预这些不平等现象。