• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辉瑞-BioNTech COVID-19 疫苗的有效性作为政策行动的证据:一项非随机研究的快速系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies.

机构信息

National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 6;17(12):e0278624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278624. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0278624
PMID:36473010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9725157/
Abstract

In December 2020, an interim recommendation for the use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in persons aged ≥16 years was made under Food and Drug Administration's Emergency Use Authorization. In preparation for Biologics License Application approval, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practice's (ACIP) decision-making for a standard recommendation. We conducted a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic COVID-19, hospitalization due to COVID-19, death due to COVID-19, and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. We identified studies through August 20, 2021 from an ongoing systematic review conducted by the International Vaccine Access Center and the World Health Organization. We evaluated each study for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. The body of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We identified 80 articles, selected 35 for full-text review, and included 26. The pooled VE of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was 92.4% (95% CI: 87.5%-95.3%) against symptomatic COVID-19 with moderate evidence certainty (eight studies), 94.3% (95% CI: 87.9%-97.3%) against hospitalization due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (eight studies), 96.1% (95% CI: 91.5%-98.2%) against death due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (four studies), and 89.3% (88.4%-90.1%) against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with very low certainty (two studies). The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated high effectiveness in all pre-specified outcomes and extended knowledge of the vaccine's benefits to outcomes and populations not informed by the RCTs. Use of an existing systematic review facilitated a rapid meta-analysis to inform an ACIP policy decision. This approach can be utilized as additional COVID-19 vaccines are considered for standard recommendations by ACIP.

摘要

2020 年 12 月,根据食品和药物管理局的紧急使用授权,辉瑞-生物技术公司的 COVID-19 疫苗在 16 岁及以上人群中的使用获得了临时推荐。为了准备获得生物制品许可申请的批准,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,为美国疾病控制与预防中心的免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)的标准建议决策提供信息。我们对辉瑞-生物技术公司 COVID-19 疫苗对有症状的 COVID-19、因 COVID-19 住院、因 COVID-19 死亡和无症状的 SARS-CoV-2 感染的有效性进行了快速系统评价和荟萃分析。我们通过国际疫苗获取中心和世界卫生组织正在进行的系统评价,于 2021 年 8 月 20 日之前确定了研究。我们使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估了每一项研究的偏倚风险。使用荟萃分析计算了汇总估计值。使用推荐评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法评估了每个结果的证据质量。我们确定了 80 篇文章,选择了 35 篇进行全文审查,并纳入了 26 篇。辉瑞-生物技术公司 COVID-19 疫苗对有症状的 COVID-19 的总体疫苗有效性为 92.4%(95%CI:87.5%-95.3%),证据质量为中度(八项研究),对因 COVID-19 住院的总体疫苗有效性为 94.3%(95%CI:87.9%-97.3%),证据质量为中度(八项研究),对因 COVID-19 死亡的总体疫苗有效性为 96.1%(95%CI:91.5%-98.2%),证据质量为中度(四项研究),对无症状的 SARS-CoV-2 感染的总体疫苗有效性为 89.3%(88.4%-90.1%),证据质量为极低(两项研究)。辉瑞-生物技术公司的 COVID-19 疫苗在所有预先指定的结果中均表现出高度有效性,并扩展了疫苗对 RCT 未涵盖的结果和人群的益处的认识。利用现有的系统评价促进了快速的荟萃分析,为 ACIP 的政策决策提供了信息。随着更多的 COVID-19 疫苗被考虑作为 ACIP 的标准推荐,这种方法可以被利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e6/9725157/efb74e4974aa/pone.0278624.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e6/9725157/5ee3b0bfcd6e/pone.0278624.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e6/9725157/ccfc7815bb99/pone.0278624.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e6/9725157/efb74e4974aa/pone.0278624.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e6/9725157/5ee3b0bfcd6e/pone.0278624.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e6/9725157/ccfc7815bb99/pone.0278624.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64e6/9725157/efb74e4974aa/pone.0278624.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies.辉瑞-BioNTech COVID-19 疫苗的有效性作为政策行动的证据:一项非随机研究的快速系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 6;17(12):e0278624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278624. eCollection 2022.
2
Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in Persons Aged ≥16 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, September 2021.《16 岁及以上人群使用辉瑞-生物科技公司的 COVID-19 疫苗:免疫实践咨询委员会的建议——美国,2021 年 9 月》。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Sep 24;70(38):1344-1348. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e2.
3
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Interim Recommendation for Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in Children Aged 5-11 Years - United States, November 2021.免疫实践咨询委员会关于在 5-11 岁儿童中使用辉瑞-生物技术公司 COVID-19 疫苗的临时建议-美国,2021 年 11 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Nov 12;70(45):1579-1583. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7045e1.
4
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Interim Recommendation for Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescents Aged 12-15 Years - United States, May 2021.免疫实践咨询委员会关于辉瑞-BioNTech COVID-19 疫苗在 12-15 岁青少年中使用的临时建议-美国,2021 年 5 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 May 21;70(20):749-752. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7020e1.
5
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Interim Recommendation for Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine - United States, December 2020.免疫实践咨询委员会关于使用辉瑞-BioNTech COVID-19 疫苗的临时建议-美国,2020 年 12 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 18;69(50):1922-1924. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6950e2.
6
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Recommendation for Use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine in Adults Aged ≥18 Years and Considerations for Extended Intervals for Administration of Primary Series Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines - United States, February 2022.美国免疫实践咨询委员会关于在≥18岁成年人中使用莫德纳2019冠状病毒病疫苗的建议以及关于延长mRNA 2019冠状病毒病疫苗基础免疫系列剂量接种间隔的考量——美国,2022年2月
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 18;71(11):416-421. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7111a4.
7
Interim Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccines in Children Aged 6 Months-5 Years - United States, June 2022.美国 2022 年 6 月关于在 6 个月至 5 岁儿童中使用 Moderna 和辉瑞-BioNTech COVID-19 疫苗的免疫实践咨询委员会临时建议。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jul 1;71(26):859-868. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7126e2.
8
Safety and effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in children aged 5-11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 疫苗在 5-11 岁儿童中的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Jun;7(6):379-391. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00078-0. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
9
Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.新型冠状病毒疫苗的有效性和安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):CD015477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015477.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19 Hospitalizations Among Adults Without Immunocompromising Conditions - United States, March-August 2021.2021年3月至8月美国Moderna、辉瑞-生物科技公司和杨森(强生)疫苗在预防无免疫功能低下状况成年人新冠病毒肺炎住院方面的比较效果
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Sep 24;70(38):1337-1343. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Phenotypes of Headaches After COVID-19 Vaccinations Differentiated According to the Vaccine Used.根据所使用疫苗区分的新冠疫苗接种后头痛的表型比较。
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jan 23;13(2):113. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13020113.
2
Bias and negative values of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness estimates from a test-negative design without controlling for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.从未控制 SARS-CoV-2 既往感染的病例对照设计中估算的 COVID-19 疫苗效力的偏倚和负值。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 20;15(1):10062. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54404-w.
3
Changes in Local and Systemic Adverse Effects following Primary and Booster Immunisation against COVID-19 in an Observational Cohort of Dutch Healthcare Workers Vaccinated with BNT162b2 (Comirnaty).

本文引用的文献

1
Similarity of Protection Conferred by Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection and by BNT162b2 Vaccine: A 3-Month Nationwide Experience From Israel.先前感染 SARS-CoV-2 和 BNT162b2 疫苗所产生的保护效果的相似性:来自以色列的为期 3 个月的全国经验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 23;191(8):1420-1428. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac060.
2
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Recommendation for Use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine in Adults Aged ≥18 Years and Considerations for Extended Intervals for Administration of Primary Series Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines - United States, February 2022.美国免疫实践咨询委员会关于在≥18岁成年人中使用莫德纳2019冠状病毒病疫苗的建议以及关于延长mRNA 2019冠状病毒病疫苗基础免疫系列剂量接种间隔的考量——美国,2022年2月
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 18;71(11):416-421. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7111a4.
3
在接种BNT162b2(Comirnaty)疫苗的荷兰医护人员观察队列中,初次和加强免疫COVID-19后局部和全身不良反应的变化。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 29;12(1):39. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12010039.
4
A summary of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) use of a benefit-risk assessment framework during the first year of COVID-19 vaccine administration in the United States.美国免疫实施咨询委员会(ACIP)在 COVID-19 疫苗接种的第一年使用获益-风险评估框架的概述。
Vaccine. 2023 Oct 20;41(44):6456-6467. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.037. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
5
Estimated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against seroconversion from SARS-CoV-2 Infection, March-October, 2021.2021 年 3 月至 10 月估计的 COVID-19 疫苗对 SARS-CoV-2 感染后血清转换的有效性。
Vaccine. 2023 Apr 6;41(15):2596-2604. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and immune response amongst individuals in clinical risk groups.辉瑞-生物科技和牛津阿斯利康 COVID-19 疫苗在临床风险人群中的有效性和免疫反应。
J Infect. 2022 May;84(5):675-683. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.044. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
4
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine effectiveness against Sars-Cov-2 infection: Findings from a large observational study in Israel.辉瑞-生物科技疫苗对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的有效性:来自以色列一项大型观察性研究的结果。
Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106947. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106947. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
5
Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 Vaccines against Symptomatic COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers in Kuwait: A Retrospective Cohort Study.BNT162b2和ChAdOx1疫苗对科威特医护人员有症状的COVID-19的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;9(12):1692. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121692.
6
Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK.德尔塔变异株对英国新冠病毒载量及针对新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染的疫苗效力的影响。
Nat Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):2127-2135. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01548-7. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in Persons Aged ≥16 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, September 2021.《16 岁及以上人群使用辉瑞-生物科技公司的 COVID-19 疫苗:免疫实践咨询委员会的建议——美国,2021 年 9 月》。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Sep 24;70(38):1344-1348. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e2.
8
Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy.BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗在妊娠中的有效性。
Nat Med. 2021 Oct;27(10):1693-1695. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01490-8. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
9
Single-Dose Messenger RNA Vaccine Effectiveness Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Healthcare Workers Extending 16 Weeks Postvaccination: A Test-Negative Design From Québec, Canada.单剂信使 RNA 疫苗在接种后 16 周对医护人员预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的有效性:来自加拿大魁北克的一项基于阴性检测设计的研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e805-e813. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab739.
10
New COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations Among Adults, by Vaccination Status - New York, May 3-July 25, 2021.2021 年 5 月 3 日至 7 月 25 日期间,成年人中按疫苗接种状态划分的新增新冠病例和住院情况 - 纽约。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 27;70(34):1150-1155. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7034e1.