Suppr超能文献

1 型肌强直性营养不良:成人发病型与晚发型亚型的比较。

Myotonic dystrophy type 1: A comparison between the adult- and late-onset subtype.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2023 Feb;67(2):130-137. doi: 10.1002/mus.27766. Epub 2022 Dec 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Although the extent of muscle weakness and organ complications has not been well studied in patients with late-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), adult-onset DM1 is associated with severe muscle involvement and possible life-threatening cardiac and respiratory complications. In this study we aimed to compare the clinical phenotype of adult-onset vs late-onset DM1, focusing on the prevalence of cardiac, respiratory, and muscular involvement.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected in the Dutch DM1 registry.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-five adult-onset and 66 late-onset DM1 patients were included. Conduction delay on electrocardiogram was present in 123 of 275 (45%) adult-onset patients, compared with 24 of 66 (36%) late-onset patients (P = .218). DM1 subtype did not predict presence of conduction delay (odds ratio [OR] 0.706; confidence interval [CI] 0.405 to 1.230, P = .219). Subtype did predict indication for noninvasive ventilation (NIV) (late onset vs adult onset: OR, 0.254; CI, 0.104 to 0.617; P = .002) and 17% of late-onset patients required NIV compared with 40% of adult-onset patients. Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS) scores were significantly different between subtypes (MIRS 1 to 3 in 66% of adult onset vs 100% of late onset [P < .001]), as were DM1-activ scores (67 ± 21 in adult onset vs 87 ± 15 in late onset; P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Although muscular phenotype was milder in late-onset compared with adult-onset DM1, the prevalence of conduction delay was comparable. Moreover, subtype was unable to predict the presence of cardiac conduction delay. Although adult-onset patients had an increased risk of having an NIV indication, 17% of late-onset patients required NIV. Despite different muscular phenotypes, screening for multiorgan involvement should be equally thorough in late-onset as in adult-onset DM1.

摘要

简介/目的:尽管晚发性肌强直性营养不良 1 型(DM1)患者的肌肉无力和器官并发症的严重程度尚未得到充分研究,但成人起病的 DM1 与严重的肌肉受累以及可能危及生命的心脏和呼吸并发症相关。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较成人起病与晚发性 DM1 的临床表型,重点关注心脏、呼吸和肌肉受累的患病率。

方法

前瞻性收集荷兰 DM1 登记处的数据。

结果

纳入了 275 例成人起病和 66 例晚发性 DM1 患者。275 例成人起病患者中 123 例(45%)存在心电图传导延迟,而 66 例晚发性 DM1 患者中 24 例(36%)存在心电图传导延迟(P =.218)。DM1 亚型并不能预测存在传导延迟(比值比 [OR] 0.706;置信区间 [CI] 0.405 至 1.230,P  =.219)。亚型确实预测了无创通气(NIV)的适应证(晚发性 vs 成人起病:OR,0.254;CI,0.104 至 0.617;P  =.002),17%的晚发性患者需要 NIV,而 40%的成人起病患者需要 NIV。肌肉功能障碍评分量表(MIRS)评分在亚型之间存在显著差异(成人起病患者中 66%为 MIRS 1 至 3,而晚发性患者为 100%[P < .001]),DM1-activ 评分也存在显著差异(成人起病患者为 67 ± 21,晚发性患者为 87 ± 15;P < .001)。

讨论

尽管与成人起病 DM1 相比,晚发性 DM1 的肌肉表型较轻,但传导延迟的患病率相当。此外,亚型无法预测心脏传导延迟的存在。尽管成人起病患者更有可能需要有 NIV 适应证,但 17%的晚发性患者需要 NIV。尽管肌肉表型不同,但对晚发性和成人起病 DM1 均应进行全面的多器官受累筛查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a06b/10107795/3db8450f61c7/MUS-67-130-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验