Suppr超能文献

阐明嵌合体研究的伦理和监督问题。

Clarifying the Ethics and Oversight of Chimeric Research.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Nov;52 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2-S23. doi: 10.1002/hast.1427.

Abstract

This article is the lead piece in a special report that presents the results of a bioethical investigation into chimeric research, which involves the insertion of human cells into nonhuman animals and nonhuman animal embryos, including into their brains. Rapid scientific developments in this field may advance knowledge and could lead to new therapies for humans. They also reveal the conceptual, ethical, and procedural limitations of existing ethics guidance for human-nonhuman chimeric research. Led by bioethics researchers working closely with an interdisciplinary work group, the investigation focused on generating conceptual clarity and identifying improvements to governance approaches, with the goal of helping scholars, funders, scientists, institutional leaders, and oversight bodies (embryonic stem cell research oversight [ESCRO] committees and institutional animal care and use committees [IACUCs]) deliver principled and trustworthy oversight of this area of science. The article, which focuses on human-nonhuman animal chimeric research that is stem cell based, identifies key ethical issues in and offers ten recommendations regarding the ethics and oversight of this research. Turning from bioethics' previous focus on human-centered questions about the ethics of "humanization" and this research's potential impact on concepts like human dignity, this article emphasizes the importance of nonhuman animal welfare concerns in chimeric research and argues for less-siloed governance and oversight and more-comprehensive public communication.

摘要

本文是一篇特别报道的开篇文章,该报道呈现了对嵌合体研究的生物伦理调查结果,其中涉及将人类细胞插入非人类动物和非人类动物胚胎中,包括其大脑。该领域的快速科学发展可能会促进知识进步,并为人类带来新的治疗方法。这些发展还揭示了现有人-非人嵌合体研究伦理准则在概念、伦理和程序方面的局限性。在密切合作的跨学科工作组的生物伦理研究人员的领导下,该调查侧重于生成概念清晰度并确定改进治理方法,目标是帮助学者、资助者、科学家、机构领导者和监督机构(胚胎干细胞研究监督委员会和机构动物护理和使用委员会)对这一科学领域进行有原则和值得信赖的监督。本文重点关注基于干细胞的人-非人动物嵌合体研究,确定了该研究的伦理问题,并提出了十项关于该研究的伦理和监督建议。本文不再关注生物伦理学以前关注的关于“人类化”伦理和该研究对人类尊严等概念的潜在影响的以人为中心的问题,而是强调了嵌合体研究中非人类动物福利问题的重要性,并呼吁减少治理和监督的隔离,以及更全面的公众沟通。

相似文献

1
Clarifying the Ethics and Oversight of Chimeric Research.阐明嵌合体研究的伦理和监督问题。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Nov;52 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2-S23. doi: 10.1002/hast.1427.
9
Vulnerable subjects? The case of nonhuman animals in experimentation.易受伤害的主体?实验中非人类动物的情况。
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Dec;10(4):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9473-4. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
10
Ethical Standards for Chimera Research Oversight.嵌合体研究监督的伦理标准。
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;2005:165-171. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9524-0_11.

本文引用的文献

7
The American Public Is Ready to Accept Human-Animal Chimera Research.美国公众已准备好接受人与动物嵌合体研究。
Stem Cell Reports. 2020 Oct 13;15(4):804-810. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Monkey Embryos Cultured to 20 Days.培养至 20 天的猴胚胎。
Stem Cells Dev. 2020 Jul 1;29(13):807-810. doi: 10.1089/scd.2020.0006. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验