Perry Erin Beth, Valach Alyssa Ann, Fenton Jesse Marie, Moore George E
Department of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.
Department of Veterinary Administration, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;12(23):3357. doi: 10.3390/ani12233357.
Starch gelatinization in pet food may be affected by moisture, retention time, and ingredients used. Starch gelatinization has been associated with changes in digestibility but is not well studied using non-traditional ingredients in canine diets. The objective of this research was to examine differences in starch content and gelatinization associated with changes in ingredient profile (traditional vs. non-traditional) and nutrient content requirements associated with differing life stages. Traditional diets (n = 10) utilizing protein sources including chicken, chicken by-product meal, meat and bone meal and plant-based ingredients including rice, barley, oats, and corn were examined in comparison with non-traditional diets (n = 10) utilizing protein sources including alligator, buffalo, venison, kangaroo, squid, quail, rabbit, and salmon along with plant-based ingredients including tapioca, chickpeas, lentils, potato, and pumpkin. Total starch and gelatinized starch (as percent of total diet) were measured with variation due to ingredient type assessed using Student’s t-test in SAS 9.4. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Total starch (as a percent of diet) was higher in traditional diets compared to non-traditional diets formulated for maintenance (p < 0.0032) or all life stages (p < 0.0128). However, starch gelatinization as a proportion of total starch was lower in traditional diets formulated for maintenance (p < 0.0165) and all life stages (p < 0.0220). Total starch and gelatinized starch had a strong negative correlation (r = −0.78; p < 0.01) in diets utilizing traditional ingredients. These novel data reveal important differences between starch content and gelatinization and may impact selection of various ingredient types by pet food manufacturers.
宠物食品中的淀粉糊化可能会受到水分、保留时间和所用成分的影响。淀粉糊化与消化率的变化有关,但在犬粮中使用非传统成分时,对其研究并不充分。本研究的目的是检验与成分构成变化(传统成分与非传统成分)相关的淀粉含量和糊化差异,以及与不同生命阶段相关的营养成分需求差异。研究对比了传统日粮(n = 10)和非传统日粮(n = 10),传统日粮使用的蛋白质来源包括鸡肉、鸡肉副产品粉、肉骨粉,植物性成分包括大米、大麦、燕麦和玉米;非传统日粮使用的蛋白质来源包括短吻鳄、水牛、鹿肉、袋鼠、鱿鱼、鹌鹑、兔子和三文鱼,植物性成分包括木薯、鹰嘴豆、小扁豆、土豆和南瓜。使用SAS 9.4中的学生t检验评估因成分类型导致的总淀粉和糊化淀粉(占日粮的百分比)变化。显著性设定为p < 0.05。与为维持期配制的非传统日粮相比(p < 0.0032),以及与为所有生命阶段配制的非传统日粮相比(p < 0.0128),传统日粮中的总淀粉(占日粮的百分比)更高。然而,为维持期配制的传统日粮(p < 0.0165)和为所有生命阶段配制的传统日粮(p < 0.0220)中,糊化淀粉占总淀粉的比例更低。在使用传统成分的日粮中,总淀粉和糊化淀粉呈强负相关(r = −0.78;p < 0.01)。这些新数据揭示了淀粉含量和糊化之间的重要差异,可能会影响宠物食品制造商对各种成分类型的选择。