• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症诊断后第一年医疗保健利用的相关因素:一项基于人群的研究。

Factors associated with healthcare utilisation during first year after cancer diagnose-a population-based study.

机构信息

Department of nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Regional Cancer Center, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Mar;30(2):e13361. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13361. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1111/ecc.13361
PMID:33216423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8047913/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improved cancer treatments and models of care (such as early palliative care) has developed during recent years. Aspects of healthcare utilisation-unplanned care have been used for evaluation of coordination and quality. The aim was to explore factors associated with cancer healthcare utilisation, during the first year after a cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

Population-based registry and patient-reported data, (The European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), QLQ- C30 questionnaire and study-specific questions) were collected. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models were performed.

RESULTS

The sample consists of 1718 patients (haematological, gynaecological, upper gastrointestinal and head and neck cancers). Living alone were associated with unplanned hospital admissions (OR 1.35; 95% CI [1.15, 1.59], p < 0.001). Patients with specialised palliative home care had a higher likelihood of unplanned hospital admissions, (OR 4.35; 95% CI [3.22-5.91], p < 0.001) and re-admissions within 30 days, (OR, 5.8; 95% CI [4.12-8.19], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographic and clinical factors, such as living alone and disease stage, is associated with healthcare utilisation. Patients with specialised palliative home care report lower levels of HRQoL and higher levels of unplanned care, and our findings stresses the importance of a holistic view when planning care.

摘要

背景

近年来,癌症治疗方法和护理模式(如早期姑息治疗)得到了改进。医疗利用方面——非计划性护理,已被用于评估协调和质量。目的是探讨癌症诊断后第一年与癌症医疗保健利用相关的因素。

方法

收集了基于人群的注册和患者报告数据(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC),QLQ-C30 问卷和特定于研究的问题)。进行了描述性统计和多变量回归模型分析。

结果

样本包括 1718 名患者(血液、妇科、上消化道和头颈部癌症)。独居与非计划性住院有关(OR 1.35;95%CI [1.15, 1.59],p<0.001)。有专门姑息治疗的家庭护理的患者更有可能接受非计划性住院治疗(OR 4.35;95%CI [3.22-5.91],p<0.001)和 30 天内再次入院(OR,5.8;95%CI [4.12-8.19],p<0.001)。

结论

社会人口统计学和临床因素,如独居和疾病阶段,与医疗保健的利用有关。有专门姑息治疗的家庭护理的患者报告的 HRQoL 水平较低,非计划性护理水平较高,我们的研究结果强调在规划护理时采取整体观点的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/f9cc24bd97a6/ECC-30-e13361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/1ce92789263b/ECC-30-e13361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/311bf96a0a10/ECC-30-e13361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/1b5da0dc35a8/ECC-30-e13361-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/4ec31eae6191/ECC-30-e13361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/f9cc24bd97a6/ECC-30-e13361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/1ce92789263b/ECC-30-e13361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/311bf96a0a10/ECC-30-e13361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/1b5da0dc35a8/ECC-30-e13361-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/4ec31eae6191/ECC-30-e13361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/8047913/f9cc24bd97a6/ECC-30-e13361-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with healthcare utilisation during first year after cancer diagnose-a population-based study.癌症诊断后第一年医疗保健利用的相关因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Mar;30(2):e13361. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13361. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Population-based reference values for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck module.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织头颈模块的基于人群的参考值。
Head Neck. 2017 Oct;39(10):2036-2047. doi: 10.1002/hed.24870. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
3
Working in silos? - Head & Neck cancer patients during and after treatment with or without early palliative care referral.各自为政?——接受或未接受早期姑息治疗转诊的头颈癌患者在治疗期间及治疗后的情况
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Feb;26:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Does palliative chemotherapy really palliate and are we measuring it correctly? A mixed methods longitudinal study of health related quality of life in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.姑息化疗真的能缓解症状吗?我们的测量方法正确吗?一项关于晚期软组织肉瘤患者健康相关生活质量的混合方法纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0210731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210731. eCollection 2019.
5
Home-based multidimensional survivorship programmes for breast cancer survivors.针对乳腺癌幸存者的居家多维康复计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 24;8(8):CD011152. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011152.pub2.
6
Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)电子患者报告结局(e-PRO)工具用于测量乳腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的可靠性:前瞻性随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 14;19(9):e322. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8210.
7
Identifying cutoff scores for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the head and neck cancer-specific module EORTC QLQ-H&N35 representing unmet supportive care needs in patients with head and neck cancer.确定欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)以及头颈部癌症特异性模块欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织问卷(EORTC QLQ-H&N35)的临界值,以代表头颈部癌症患者未满足的支持性护理需求。
Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E1493-500. doi: 10.1002/hed.24266. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
8
Cross-cultural verification of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire in mainland China.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C15-PAL问卷在中国内地的跨文化验证
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):401-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216315593671. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
The EORTC QLQ-C30 Summary Score as Prognostic Factor for Survival of Patients with Cancer in the "Real-World": Results from the Population-Based PROFILES Registry.EORTC QLQ-C30 总评分作为“真实世界”中癌症患者生存预后因素:基于人群的 PROFILES 登记研究结果。
Oncologist. 2020 Apr;25(4):e722-e732. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0348. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing innovative policies and practices for palliative care in Portugal: a qualitative study.分析葡萄牙姑息治疗的创新政策和实践:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 11;23(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01556-7.
2
Patterns and outcome of unplanned care in lung cancer patients: an observational study in a medical oncology department.肺癌患者非计划性医疗的模式与结局:肿瘤内科的一项观察性研究
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Aug 30;12(8):1752-1765. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-48. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
Drivers of Emergency Department Use Among Oncology Patients in the Era of Novel Cancer Therapeutics: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer immunotherapy: Pros, cons and beyond.癌症免疫疗法:利弊及其他。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Apr;124:109821. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109821. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
2
Patient-reported perceptions of care after the introduction of a new advanced cancer nursing role in Sweden.患者对瑞典引入新的高级癌症护理角色后的护理感知。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;41:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
3
Validation of data quality in the Swedish National Register for Breast Cancer.瑞典乳腺癌国家登记处数据质量的验证。
新型癌症疗法时代肿瘤患者急诊就诊的驱动因素:系统综述。
Oncologist. 2023 Dec 11;28(12):1020-1033. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad161.
4
Exploring Health Care Professionals' Perceptions Regarding Shared Clinical Decision-Making in Both Acute and Palliative Cancer Care.探索医疗保健专业人员对急性和姑息治疗癌症护理中共同临床决策的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16134. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316134.
5
Trends and outcomes of early and late palliative care consultation for adult patients with glioblastoma: A SEER-Medicare retrospective study.胶质母细胞瘤成年患者早期和晚期姑息治疗会诊的趋势与结果:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险回顾性研究
Neurooncol Pract. 2022 Mar 30;9(4):299-309. doi: 10.1093/nop/npac026. eCollection 2022 Aug.
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 2;19(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6846-6.
4
Potentially Avoidable Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者的潜在可避免的医院再入院。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 May;15(5):e420-e427. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00595. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
Integration of oncology and palliative care: a Lancet Oncology Commission.肿瘤学与姑息治疗的整合:柳叶刀肿瘤学委员会报告
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):e588-e653. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30415-7. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
6
First results from the Swedish National Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer Registry.瑞典国家胰腺和壶腹周围癌登记处的初步结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Jan;21(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.06.1811. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
7
Access to supportive care during and after cancer treatment and the impact of socioeconomic factors.癌症治疗期间和治疗后的支持性护理的获得情况,以及社会经济因素的影响。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Oct;57(10):1303-1310. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1484157. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
8
How family caregivers of cancer patients manage symptoms at home: A systematic review.癌症患者家庭照顾者如何在家中管理症状:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Sep;85:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
Medium and long-term emergency department utilization after oesophagectomy: a population-based analysis.食管切除术后中远期急诊科利用情况:基于人群的分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):683-688. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy155.
10
Effect of early and systematic integration of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer: a randomised controlled trial.早期及系统的姑息治疗整合对晚期癌症患者的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):394-404. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30060-3. Epub 2018 Feb 3.