• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绿色技术变革及其对农业产业的影响因素:来自中国省级层面的经验证据。

Green-Biased Technical Change and Its Influencing Factors of Agriculture Industry: Empirical Evidence at the Provincial Level in China.

机构信息

School of Business, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316369.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192316369
PMID:36498441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9735650/
Abstract

The continued expansion of agriculture must contend with the dual pressures of changing factor endowment structure and constrained resources and environments. The main purpose of this paper is to provide feasible ideas for high-quality agricultural development in the transition period through the research on the green-biased technical change in Chinese agriculture. This paper selects China's provincial panel data of the agriculture industry from 1997 to 2017, combining the DEA-SBM model and Malmquist-Luenberger index decomposition method to calculate the green-biased technical change (BTC) index; second, the influence mechanism of BTC is empirically investigated by using the panel data regression analysis approach. The results show that: (1) in China's agriculture industry, BTC is the driving force behind long-term and steady improvement of technological advancement. Specifically, input-biased technical change (IBTC) has a substantial enhancing effect on agricultural green total factor productivity (GTFP), whereas output-biased technical change (OBTC) has a certain inhibiting effect. (2) On the whole, the tendency of capital substituting for labor and land is very evident, whereas the biased advantage of desirable output is not particularly prominent. (3) The BTC index in Chinese agriculture varies regionally. The eastern region has the highest IBTC index but the lowest OBTC index. (4) The degree of marketization, urbanization, capital deepening, financial support for agriculture, and other factors have a promoting effect on IBTC, whereas most of them have a restraining effect on OBTC. There is evident regional heterogeneity in the effect of environmental regulation intensity on BTC. The following are the primary contributions of this paper: based on national conditions in China, this paper empirically explores the changes and internal rules of green-biased technical change in China's agriculture industry from various regional viewpoints. It provides an empirical foundation for the regional diversification of agricultural green transformation.

摘要

农业的持续扩张必须应对不断变化的要素禀赋结构和资源环境约束的双重压力。本文的主要目的是通过研究中国农业的绿色偏向技术变革,为转型期的高质量农业发展提供可行的思路。本文选取了中国 1997 年至 2017 年农业产业的省级面板数据,结合 DEA-SBM 模型和 Malmquist-Luenberger 指数分解方法,计算了绿色偏向技术变化(BTC)指数;其次,利用面板数据回归分析方法,实证考察了 BTC 的影响机制。结果表明:(1)在中国农业产业中,BTC 是技术进步长期稳定提高的驱动力。具体而言,投入偏向技术变化(IBTC)对农业绿色全要素生产率(GTFP)有实质性的增强作用,而产出偏向技术变化(OBTC)则有一定的抑制作用。(2)总的来说,资本替代劳动和土地的趋势非常明显,而理想产出的偏向优势并不特别突出。(3)中国农业的 BTC 指数存在区域差异。东部地区的 IBTC 指数最高,但 OBTC 指数最低。(4)市场化程度、城市化程度、资本深化、农业金融支持等因素对 IBTC 有促进作用,而对 OBTC 则有抑制作用。环境规制强度对 BTC 的影响存在明显的区域异质性。本文的主要贡献如下:基于中国国情,从不同区域视角实证探讨了中国农业产业绿色偏向技术变化的变化及其内在规律,为农业绿色转型的区域多样化提供了实证基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/1946f4beac08/ijerph-19-16369-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/7ce3a0a009a0/ijerph-19-16369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/9a76d011680c/ijerph-19-16369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/69fb7e9f8405/ijerph-19-16369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/1946f4beac08/ijerph-19-16369-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/7ce3a0a009a0/ijerph-19-16369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/9a76d011680c/ijerph-19-16369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/69fb7e9f8405/ijerph-19-16369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e3/9735650/1946f4beac08/ijerph-19-16369-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Green-Biased Technical Change and Its Influencing Factors of Agriculture Industry: Empirical Evidence at the Provincial Level in China.绿色技术变革及其对农业产业的影响因素:来自中国省级层面的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316369.
2
The positive role of trade openness in industrial green total factor productivity-provincial evidence from China.贸易开放对工业绿色全要素生产率的积极作用——来自中国省级的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(5):6538-6551. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16164-8. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
3
Going Green or Going Away? A Spatial Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Environmental Regulations, Biased Technological Progress, and Green Total Factor Productivity.走向绿色还是走向消亡?环境规制、偏向性技术进步与绿色全要素生产率关系的空间实证检验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 3;15(9):1917. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091917.
4
A Blessing or a Curse? Exploring the Impact of Environmental Regulation on China's Regional Green Development from the Perspective of Governance Transformation.是福是祸?从治理转型视角探究环境规制对中国区域绿色发展的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 25;19(3):1312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031312.
5
Analysis of regional differences and dynamic mechanisms of agricultural carbon emission efficiency in China's seven agricultural regions.中国七大农业区域农业碳排放效率的区域差异及动态机制分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):38258-38284. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16661-w. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
6
Transformation of pollution control and green development: Evidence from China's chemical industry.污染治理与绿色发展转型:来自中国化工行业的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Dec 1;275:111246. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111246. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
7
Spatio-temporal comprehensive measurement of China's agricultural green development level and associated influencing factors.中国农业绿色发展水平的时空综合测度及影响因素分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 4;18(8):e0288599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288599. eCollection 2023.
8
North-south regional differential decomposition and spatiotemporal dynamic evolution of China's industrial green total factor productivity.中国工业绿色全要素生产率的南北区域差异分解及时空动态演进。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37706-37725. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24697-9. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
9
Regional differences and threshold effects of labor transfer affecting the technical efficiency of China's agricultural industry: A case study of the apple industry.劳动力转移对中国农业技术效率的影响的区域差异和门槛效应:以苹果产业为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0278348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278348. eCollection 2023.
10
Green Biased Technical Change in Terms of Industrial Water Resources in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt.中国长江经济带工业水资源的绿色偏向技术变革。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 17;17(8):2789. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082789.

本文引用的文献

1
Spatial Spillover Effects of Resource Misallocation on the Green Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Agriculture.资源错配对中国农业绿色全要素生产率的空间溢出效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315718.
2
Spatial Distribution and Convergence of Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in China.中国农业绿色全要素生产率的空间分布与收敛性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;19(14):8786. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148786.
3
Measuring China's agricultural green total factor productivity and its drivers during 1998-2019.
测度 1998-2019 年中国农业绿色全要素生产率及其驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 10;829:154477. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154477. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
Carbon emission intensity and biased technical change in China's different regions: a novel multidimensional decomposition approach.中国不同地区的碳排放强度与偏向性技术进步:一种新颖的多维分解方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):38083-38096. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18098-7. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
5
Green Biased Technical Change in Terms of Industrial Water Resources in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt.中国长江经济带工业水资源的绿色偏向技术变革。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 17;17(8):2789. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082789.
6
Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Agriculture Green Total Factor Productivity in China, 1998-2016: Based on More Sophisticated Calculations of Carbon Emissions.中国 1998-2016 年农业绿色全要素生产率的时空特征:基于碳排放更精确的测算。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 16;16(20):3932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203932.
7
Assessment of Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Their Spatiotemporal Changes in China, 1997-2016.中国 1997-2016 年农业碳排放评估及其时空变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 26;16(17):3105. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173105.
8
How does environmental regulation affect haze pollution governance?-An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data.环境规制如何影响雾霾污染治理?——基于中国省级面板数据的实证检验。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 10;695:133905. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133905. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
9
An inventory analysis of rural pollution loads in China.中国农村污染负荷清单分析。
Water Sci Technol. 2006;54(11-12):65-74. doi: 10.2166/wst.2006.831.