Sohn James J, Polizzi Mitchell, Richeson Dylan, Gholami Somayeh, Das Indra J, Song William Y
Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 26;11(23):6989. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236989.
A novel clinical workflow utilizing a direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator in combination with a patient-specific, 3D printed vaginal needle-track template for an advanced image-guided adaptive interstitial brachytherapy of the cervix. The proposed workflow has three main steps: (1) pre-treatment MRI, (2) an initial optimization of the needle positions based on the DMBT tandem positioning and patient anatomy, and a subsequent inverse optimization using the combined DMBT tandem and needles, and (3) rapid 3D printing. We retrospectively re-planned five patient cases for two scenarios; one plan with the DMBT tandem (T) and ovoids (O) with the original needle (ND) positions (DMBT + O + ND) and another with the DMBT T&O and spatially reoptimized needles (OptN) positions (DMBT + O + OptN). All retrospectively reoptimized plans have been compared to the original plan (OP) as well. The accuracy of 3D printing was verified through the image registration between the planning CT and the CT of the 3D-printed template. The average difference in D for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid between the OPs and DMBT + O + OptNs were -8.03 ± 4.04%, -18.67 ± 5.07%, and -26.53 ± 4.85%, respectively. In addition, these average differences between the DMBT + O + ND and DMBT + O + OptNs were -2.55 ± 1.87%, -10.70 ± 3.45%, and -22.03 ± 6.01%, respectively. The benefits could be significant for the patients in terms of target coverage and normal tissue sparing and increase the optimality over free-hand needle positioning.
一种新颖的临床工作流程,利用方向调制近距离放射治疗(DMBT)串联施源器结合患者特异性的3D打印阴道针道模板,用于晚期图像引导的宫颈自适应组织间近距离放射治疗。所提出的工作流程有三个主要步骤:(1)治疗前MRI,(2)基于DMBT串联定位和患者解剖结构对针位置进行初始优化,随后使用DMBT串联和针进行逆向优化,以及(3)快速3D打印。我们回顾性地为五个患者病例重新规划了两种方案;一种方案是使用DMBT串联(T)和卵圆形容器(O)以及原始针(ND)位置(DMBT + O + ND),另一种方案是使用DMBT T&O和空间重新优化的针(OptN)位置(DMBT + O + OptN)。所有回顾性重新优化的方案也都与原始方案(OP)进行了比较。通过规划CT与3D打印模板的CT之间的图像配准验证了3D打印的准确性。OP与DMBT + O + OptN之间膀胱、直肠和乙状结肠的D平均差异分别为-8.03±4.04%、-18.67±5.07%和-26.53±4.85%。此外,DMBT + O + ND与DMBT + O + OptN之间的这些平均差异分别为-2.55±1.87%、-10.