Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC), National Research Council (CNR), 80131 Napoli, Italy.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 24;23(23):14655. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314655.
We assessed whether concomitant exposure of human monocytes to bacterial agents and different engineered nanoparticles can affect the induction of protective innate memory, an immune mechanism that affords better resistance to diverse threatening challenges. Monocytes were exposed in vitro to nanoparticles of different chemical nature, shape and size either alone or admixed with LPS, and cell activation was assessed in terms of production of inflammatory (TNFα, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-1Ra). After return to baseline conditions, cells were re-challenged with LPS and their secondary "memory" response measured. Results show that nanoparticles alone are essentially unable to generate memory, while LPS induced a tolerance memory response (less inflammatory cytokines, equal or increased anti-inflammatory cytokines). LPS-induced tolerance was not significantly affected by the presence of nanoparticles during the memory generation phase, although with substantial donor-to-donor variability. This suggests that, despite the overall lack of significant effects on LPS-induced innate memory, nanoparticles may have donor-specific effects. Thus, future nanosafety assessment and nanotherapeutic strategies will need a personalized approach in order to ensure both the safety and efficacy of nano medical compounds for individual patients.
我们评估了人类单核细胞同时暴露于细菌制剂和不同工程纳米颗粒是否会影响保护性先天记忆的诱导,这是一种提供更好的抵抗多种威胁性挑战的免疫机制。单核细胞在体外单独或与 LPS 混合暴露于不同化学性质、形状和大小的纳米颗粒,并根据炎症(TNFα、IL-6)和抗炎细胞因子(IL-10、IL-1Ra)的产生来评估细胞激活。在恢复到基线条件后,用 LPS 重新挑战细胞,并测量其二次“记忆”反应。结果表明,纳米颗粒本身基本上无法产生记忆,而 LPS 诱导了耐受记忆反应(较少的炎症细胞因子,相等或增加的抗炎细胞因子)。在记忆生成阶段,纳米颗粒的存在并没有显著影响 LPS 诱导的耐受,尽管存在很大的供体间变异性。这表明,尽管纳米颗粒对 LPS 诱导的先天记忆没有显著影响,但它们可能对供体具有特异性影响。因此,未来的纳米安全性评估和纳米治疗策略将需要个性化的方法,以确保纳米医疗化合物对个体患者的安全性和有效性。