• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production.预测胚胎学实验室的成功:算法技术在知识生产中的应用。
Sci Technol Human Values. 2023 Jan;48(1):212-233. doi: 10.1177/01622439211057105. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
The trouble with IVF and randomised control trials: Professional legitimation narratives on time-lapse imaging and evidence-informed care.体外受精和随机对照试验的问题:关于延时成像和循证护理的专业合法化叙事。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;258:113115. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113115. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
3
Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.通过人工智能与胚胎学家进行胚胎选择:一项系统综述。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023.
4
Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF.开发一种基于人工智能的评估模型,用于通过体外受精期间光学显微镜拍摄的静态图像预测胚胎活力。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):770-784. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa013.
5
Non-invasive embryo evaluation and selection using time-lapse monitoring: Results of a randomized controlled study.使用延时监测进行无创胚胎评估与选择:一项随机对照研究的结果
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection.使用具备自动延时功能的测试辅助胚胎选择,可提高第3天胚胎移植的着床率。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):369-75.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.030. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?胚胎学家在评估囊胚着床概率时的意见一致:数据驱动的预测是否是解决胚胎评估主观性的方法?
Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2275-2290. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac171.
8
When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry.当手工制作被淘汰时:跨国生育产业背景下的胚胎培养与知识生产
Soc Stud Sci. 2022 Jun;52(3):425-446. doi: 10.1177/03063127221083869. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
9
Blastocyst telomere length predicts successful implantation after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.囊胚端粒长度可预测冻融胚胎移植后的成功着床。
Hum Reprod Open. 2024 Feb 24;2024(2):hoae012. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae012. eCollection 2024.
10
Generative artificial intelligence to produce high-fidelity blastocyst-stage embryo images.生成式人工智能生成高保真囊胚期胚胎图像。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1197-1207. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae064.

引用本文的文献

1
Using interview excerpts to facilitate focus group discussion.利用访谈摘录促进焦点小组讨论。
Qual Res. 2025 Feb;25(1):130-146. doi: 10.1177/14687941241234283. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.通过人工智能与胚胎学家进行胚胎选择:一项系统综述。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023.
3
Accounting for complexity in healthcare innovation debates: Professional views on the use of new IVF treatments.考量医疗保健创新辩论中的复杂性:关于新型体外受精治疗应用的专业观点。
Health (London). 2023 Nov;27(6):907-923. doi: 10.1177/13634593221074874. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Enacting evidence-based medicine in fertility care: Tensions between commercialisation and knowledge standardisation.在生育保健中实施循证医学:商业化与知识标准化之间的紧张关系。
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Nov;43(9):2015-2030. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13381. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
2
The trouble with IVF and randomised control trials: Professional legitimation narratives on time-lapse imaging and evidence-informed care.体外受精和随机对照试验的问题:关于延时成像和循证护理的专业合法化叙事。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;258:113115. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113115. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
3
Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection.胚胎培养和选择的延时技术。
Ups J Med Sci. 2020 May;125(2):77-84. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1728444. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
4
The datafication of reproduction: time-lapse embryo imaging and the commercialisation of IVF.生殖的数据化:延时胚胎成像与 IVF 的商业化。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Oct;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):193-209. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12881.
5
Worldwide decline of IVF birth rates and its probable causes.全球体外受精出生率的下降及其可能原因。
Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Aug 8;2019(3):hoz017. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz017. eCollection 2019.
6
Paving the way for a gold standard of care for infertility treatment: improving outcomes through standardization of laboratory procedures.为不孕治疗的黄金标准铺平道路:通过实验室程序标准化提高治疗效果。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Oct;35(4):391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
7
Retro reproduction: an old imaging technology rewrites the rules of modern embryology.复古再现:一项古老的成像技术改写现代胚胎学规则。
IEEE Pulse. 2015 May-Jun;6(3):22-7. doi: 10.1109/MPUL.2015.2409098.
8
Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the Embryoscope time-lapse video system.利用胚胎观察仪延时视频系统观察到的人类胚胎反向分裂的流行率、后果和意义。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1295-1300.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1235. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
9
Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.应用延时监测选择人类胚胎的临床结局:系统评价。
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu023. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
10
New approaches to embryo selection.胚胎选择的新方法。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Nov;27(5):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

预测胚胎学实验室的成功:算法技术在知识生产中的应用。

Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production.

作者信息

Geampana Alina, Perrotta Manuela

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Policy, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Department of People and Organisations, School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Sci Technol Human Values. 2023 Jan;48(1):212-233. doi: 10.1177/01622439211057105. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1177/01622439211057105
PMID:36504522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9727110/
Abstract

This article analyzes local algorithmic practices resulting from the increased use of time-lapse (TL) imaging in fertility treatment. The data produced by TL technologies are expected to help professionals pick the best embryo for implantation. The emergence of TL has been characterized by promissory discourses of deeper embryo knowledge and expanded selection standardization, despite professionals having no conclusive evidence that TL improves pregnancy rates. Our research explores the use of TL tools in embryology labs. We pay special attention to standardization efforts and knowledge-creation facilitated through TL and its incorporated algorithms. Using ethnographic data from five UK clinical sites, we argue that knowledge generated through TL is contingent upon complex human-machine interactions that produce local uncertainties. Thus, algorithms do not simply add medical knowledge. Rather, they rearrange professional practice and expertise. Firstly, we show how TL changes lab routines and training needs. Secondly, we show that the human input TL requires renders the algorithm itself an uncertain and situated practice. This, in turn, raises professional questions about the algorithm's authority in embryo selection. The article demonstrates the embedded nature of algorithmic knowledge production, thus pointing to the need for STS scholarship to further explore the locality of algorithms and AI.

摘要

本文分析了生育治疗中延时(TL)成像使用增加所产生的局部算法实践。TL技术产生的数据有望帮助专业人员挑选出最佳的胚胎用于植入。尽管专业人员没有确凿证据表明TL能提高妊娠率,但TL的出现一直伴随着有关更深入的胚胎知识和扩大选择标准化的承诺性论述。我们的研究探讨了TL工具在胚胎学实验室中的使用。我们特别关注通过TL及其内置算法所推动的标准化努力和知识创造。利用来自英国五个临床地点的人种志数据,我们认为通过TL产生的知识取决于复杂的人机交互,而这种交互会产生局部的不确定性。因此,算法并非简单地增加医学知识。相反,它们重新安排了专业实践和专业知识。首先,我们展示了TL如何改变实验室日常工作和培训需求。其次,我们表明TL所需的人工输入使得算法本身成为一种不确定的、因地制宜的实践。这反过来又引发了关于算法在胚胎选择中的权威性的专业问题。本文展示了算法知识生产的嵌入性本质,从而指出科学技术与社会(STS)学术研究需要进一步探索算法和人工智能的局部性。