• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过“分享关爱”计划大规模实施共同决策的可持续性。

Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program.

作者信息

Stolz-Klingenberg Constanze, Bünzen Claudia, Coors Marie, Flüh Charlotte, Margraf Nils G, Wehkamp Kai, Clayman Marla L, Scheibler Fueloep, Wehking Felix, Rüffer Jens Ulrich, Schüttig Wiebke, Sundmacher Leonie, Synowitz Michael, Berg Daniela, Geiger Friedemann

机构信息

National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1037447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447
PMID:36504657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9726727/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

SHARE TO CARE (S2C) is a comprehensive implementation program for shared decision making (SDM). It is run at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH) in Kiel, Germany, and consists of four combined intervention modules addressing healthcare professionals and patients: (1) multimodal training of physicians (2) patient activation campaign including the ASK3 method, (3) online evidence-based patient decision aids (4) SDM support by nurses. This study examines the sustainability of the hospital wide SDM implementation by means of the Neuromedical Center comprising the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2020, the S2C program was applied initially within the Neuromedical Center: We implemented the patient activation campaign, trained 89% of physicians ( = 56), developed 12 patient decision aids and educated two decision coaches. Physicians adjusted the patients' pathways to facilitate the use of decision aids. To maintain the initial implementation, the departments took care that new staff members received training and decision aids were updated. The patient activation campaign was continued. To determine the sustainability of the initial intervention, the SDM level after a maintenance phase of 6-18 months was compared to the baseline level before implementation. Therefore, in- and outpatients received a questionnaire mail after discharge. The primary endpoint was the "Patient Decision Making" subscale of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS). Secondary endpoints were an additional scale measuring SDM (CollaboRATE), and the PrepDM scale, which determines patients' perceived health literacy while preparing for decision making. Mean scale scores were compared using -tests.

RESULTS

Patients reported a significantly increased SDM level (PICS = 0.02; Hedges' = 0.33; CollaboRATE = 0.05; Hedges' = 0.26) and improved preparation for decision making (PrepDM = 0.001; Hedges' = 0.34) 6-18 months after initial implementation of S2C.

DISCUSSION

The S2C program demonstrated its sustainability within the Neuromedical Center at UKSH Kiel in terms of increased SDM and health literacy. Maintaining the SDM implementation required a fraction of the initial intensity. The departments took on the responsibility for maintenance. Meanwhile, an additional health insurance-based reimbursement for S2C secures the continued application of the program.

CONCLUSION

SHARE TO CARE promises to be suitable for long-lasting implementation of SDM in hospitals.

摘要

引言

“分享关爱”(S2C)是一项针对共同决策(SDM)的全面实施计划。该计划在德国基尔的石勒苏益格 - 荷尔斯泰因大学医院(UKSH)开展,由四个针对医护人员和患者的联合干预模块组成:(1)医生的多模式培训;(2)包括ASK3方法的患者激活活动;(3)基于证据的在线患者决策辅助工具;(4)护士提供的SDM支持。本研究通过包括神经内科和神经外科的神经医学中心,考察全院范围内SDM实施的可持续性。

方法

2018年至2020年期间,S2C计划最初在神经医学中心实施:我们开展了患者激活活动,培训了89%的医生(共56名),开发了12种患者决策辅助工具,并培训了两名决策指导人员。医生调整了患者的就医流程,以方便使用决策辅助工具。为维持最初的实施效果,各科室确保新员工接受培训,决策辅助工具得到更新。患者激活活动继续开展。为确定最初干预措施的可持续性,将6 - 18个月维持阶段后的SDM水平与实施前的基线水平进行比较。因此,门诊和住院患者在出院后收到问卷调查邮件。主要终点是“感知参与护理量表”(PICS)中的“患者决策制定”子量表。次要终点是另一个衡量SDM的量表(CollaboRATE),以及PrepDM量表,该量表在患者准备决策时确定其感知健康素养。使用t检验比较平均量表得分。

结果

在最初实施S2C后的6 - 18个月,患者报告SDM水平显著提高(PICS,P = 0.02;Hedges' g = 0.33;CollaboRATE,P = 0.05;Hedges' g = 0.26),决策准备情况有所改善(PrepDM,P = 0.001;Hedges' g = 0.34)。

讨论

S2C计划在基尔UKSH的神经医学中心展示了其在提高SDM和健康素养方面的可持续性。维持SDM的实施所需强度仅为初始强度的一部分。各科室承担了维持的责任。与此同时,基于医疗保险的S2C额外报销确保了该计划的持续应用。

结论

“分享关爱”有望适用于医院中SDM的长期实施。

相似文献

1
Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program.通过“分享关爱”计划大规模实施共同决策的可持续性。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1037447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447. eCollection 2022.
2
Comprehensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in a Neuromedical Center Using the SHARE TO CARE Program.在神经医学中心通过“共享关爱”计划全面实施共同决策
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 13;17:131-139. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S388432. eCollection 2023.
3
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响:一项前后试验。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.
4
Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital.让共同决策(SDM)成为现实:德国北部一家大学医院大规模长期实施SDM项目的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575.
5
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评价癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的结果。
Implement Sci. 2021 Dec 29;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01174-4.
6
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评估癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0740-y.
7
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
8
Shared decision making in recurrent ovarian cancer: Implementation of patient decision aids across three departments of oncology in Denmark.复发性卵巢癌的共同决策:丹麦三个肿瘤科对患者决策辅助工具的应用
PEC Innov. 2022 Nov 1;1:100095. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100095. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Moving towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Germany.迈向以患者为中心的医疗照护和共同决策的德国模式。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Implementation of a shared decision-making training program for clinicians based on the major depressive disorder guidelines in Japan: A multi-center cluster randomized trial.基于日本重度抑郁症指南为临床医生实施的共同决策培训项目:一项多中心整群随机试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 12;13:967750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.967750. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the care gap: patients' needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy.弥合护理差距:患者在放射治疗共同决策方面的需求与体验
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Nov 24;50:100897. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100897. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Patient experiences and needs in cancer care- results from a nationwide cross-sectional study in Germany.癌症护理中的患者体验与需求——德国一项全国性横断面研究的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 2;24(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10951-y.
3
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响:一项前后试验。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.

本文引用的文献

1
Preferred and perceived participation roles of oncological patients in medical decision-making: Results of a survey among users of the German Cancer Information Service.肿瘤患者在医疗决策中偏好和感知的参与角色:德国癌症信息服务用户调查的结果。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Aug;172:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.026. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
2
A scattered landscape: assessment of the evidence base for 71 patient decision aids developed in a hospital setting.分散的景观:对 71 种在医院环境中开发的患者决策辅助工具的证据基础的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01777-x.
3
The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence Update 2.0.国际患者决策辅助工具标准(IPDAS)协作组织:证据更新2.0
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):729-733. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211035681. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
4
The Hospital-Wide Implementation of Shared Decision-Making–Initial Findings of the Kiel SHARE TO CARE Program.全院实施共同决策——基尔“分享关爱”项目的初步结果
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Apr 2;118(13):225-226. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0144.
5
The effect of a scalable online training module for shared decision making based on flawed video examples - a randomized controlled trial.基于有缺陷视频示例的可扩展在线共享决策培训模块的效果 - 一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1568-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
6
Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital.让共同决策(SDM)成为现实:德国北部一家大学医院大规模长期实施SDM项目的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575.
7
[Shared decision making in breast care centres in North Rhine-Westphalia: results of a 10-year trend analysis].[北莱茵-威斯特法伦州乳腺护理中心的共同决策:一项为期10年的趋势分析结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Shared decision making for men facing prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.面临前列腺癌治疗的男性的共同决策:随机对照试验的系统评价
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 17;13:1153-1174. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S202034. eCollection 2019.
9
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
10
Using CollaboRATE, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: Results from three clinical settings in the United States.使用 CollaboRATE,一种简短的患者报告的共享决策测量工具:来自美国三个临床环境的结果。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):82-89. doi: 10.1111/hex.12588. Epub 2017 Jul 5.