Guadagni Simone, Marmorino Federica, Furbetta Niccolò, Carullo Martina, Gianardi Desirée, Palmeri Matteo, Di Franco Gregorio, Comandatore Annalisa, Moretto Roberto, Cecilia Elisa, Dima Giovanni, Masi Gianluca, Cremolini Chiara, Di Candio Giulio, Morelli Luca
General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Unit of Oncology 2, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 14;12:1023301. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1023301. eCollection 2022.
Hepatic resection is the only chance of cure for a subgroup of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis. As the oncologic outcomes of intra-operative microwaves ablation combined with hepatic resection still remain uncertain in this setting, we aimed to compare this approach with surgery alone in patient's candidate to metastases resection with radical intent.
Using a case-matched methodology based on age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology score, Body Mass Index, and burden that take in consideration the number and maximum size of lesions, 20 patients undergoing hepatic resection plus intra-operative microwaves (SURG + IMW group) and 20 patients undergoing hepatic resection alone (SURG group), were included. Relapse-free Survival and post-resection Overall Survival were compared between patients of two groups.
At the median follow up of 22.4 ± 17.8, 12/20 patients (60%) in SURG +IMW group and 13/20 patients (65%) in the SURG group experienced liver metastasis recurrence (p=0.774). None of them had recurrence at the same surgical or ablation site of the first hepatic treatment. 7/12 patients in the SURG+IMW group and 7/13 patients in the SURG group underwent at least one further surgical treatment after relapse (p = 1.000). No difference was reported between the two groups in terms of Relapse-free Survival (p = 0.685) and post-resection Overall Survival (p = 0.151). The use of intra-operative microwaves was not an independent factor affecting Relapse-free Survival and post-resection Overall Survival at univariate and multivariate analysis.
Patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis undergoing surgery plus intra-operative microwaves have similar post-operative results compared with surgery alone group. The choice between the two approaches could be only technical, depending on the site, number, and volume of the metastases. This approach could also be used in patients with liver metastasis relapse who have already undergone hepatic surgery.
肝切除术是一部分结直肠癌肝转移患者唯一的治愈机会。鉴于术中微波消融联合肝切除术在此情况下的肿瘤学结局仍不确定,我们旨在将这种方法与单纯手术治疗进行比较,以评估有根治性切除意向的肝转移患者。
采用基于年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会评分、体重指数以及考虑病变数量和最大尺寸的负荷的病例匹配方法,纳入20例行肝切除术加术中微波治疗的患者(手术+术中微波组)和20例行单纯肝切除术的患者(手术组)。比较两组患者的无复发生存期和切除术后总生存期。
在中位随访时间22.4±17.8个月时,手术+术中微波组20例患者中有12例(60%)、手术组20例患者中有13例(65%)发生肝转移复发(p=0.774)。他们均未在首次肝脏治疗的同一手术或消融部位复发。手术+术中微波组12例患者中有7例、手术组13例患者中有7例在复发后接受了至少一次进一步的手术治疗(p = 1.000 )。两组在无复发生存期(p = 0.685)和切除术后总生存期(p = 0.151)方面均无差异。在单因素和多因素分析中,术中微波的使用并非影响无复发生存期和切除术后总生存期的独立因素结论:与单纯手术组相比,接受手术加术中微波治疗的结直肠癌肝转移患者术后结果相似。两种方法之间的选择可能仅取决于技术因素取决于转移灶部位数量大小。这种方法也可用于已经接受过肝脏手术且出现肝转移复发的患者。