Suppr超能文献

三种用于伴有分层的大型或巨大肩袖撕裂的缝合桥技术的比较。

Comparison of three suture-bridge techniques for large or massive rotator cuff tear with delamination.

作者信息

Okubo Atsushi, Yotsumoto Tadahiko, Watanabe Nobuyoshi, Kajikawa Teruyoshi, Nakajima Shun, Oshima Yasushi, Iizawa Norishige, Majima Tokifumi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto Kujo Hospital, 10 Karahashi Rajomon, Minami-ku, Kyoto 601-8453, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-5-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan.

出版信息

SICOT J. 2021;7:41. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021039. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rotator cuff tear with delamination is considered a risk factor for postoperative retear. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between three repair procedures for large or massive rotator cuff tears with delamination: conventional en masse suture bridge (EMSB), double-layer suture bridge (DLSB), and the combination of DLSB with modified Debyere-Patte (DLSB + DP).

METHODS

53 shoulders of 52 patients who had massive rotator cuff tears with delamination were categorized into three groups: EMSB (18 shoulders), DLSB (24 shoulders), and DLSB + DP (11 shoulders). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 34.6 months. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included a range of motion (ROM), Constant scores, global fatty degeneration (GFDI), and tendon integrity according to Sugaya's classification by magnetic resonance images (MRI).

RESULTS

In all groups, ROM significantly improved after the procedures. Mean constant scores significantly improved: from 45.5 to 77.4 after EMSB, from 45.5 to 87.6 after DLSB, and from 46.3 to 88.0 after DLSB + DP. Significant differences were noted in postoperative Constant scores (p = 0.018: DLSB vs. EMSB, and p = 0.045: DLSB + DP vs. EMSB). The Constant pain scores were better for DLSB + DP than for EMSB (p = 0.012). Global fatty degeneration index (GFDI) with DLSB + DP was significantly higher than that for either EMSB or DLSB, indicating significant preoperative fatty degeneration for DLSB + DP. Retear occurred in 27.8% of the EMSB group, 12.5% of the DLSB group, and 9.1% of the DLSB + DP group.

DISCUSSION

Comparisons of the three groups demonstrated that DLSB and DLSB + DP achieved better clinical outcomes than EMSB for the repair of large or massive rotator cuff tears. DLSB + DP is useful for massive rotator cuff tears with severe fatty degeneration or for cases where the presence of excessive tension is anticipated when repairing the torn cuff.

摘要

引言

伴有分层的肩袖撕裂被认为是术后再撕裂的一个危险因素。本研究的目的是比较三种修复伴有分层的大型或巨大型肩袖撕裂的手术方法的临床效果:传统整块缝合桥接术(EMSB)、双层缝合桥接术(DLSB)以及DLSB联合改良Debyere - Patte术(DLSB + DP)。

方法

52例患有巨大型肩袖撕裂伴分层的患者的53个肩部被分为三组:EMSB组(18个肩部)、DLSB组(24个肩部)和DLSB + DP组(11个肩部)。术后平均随访期为34.6个月。术前和术后评估包括活动范围(ROM)、Constant评分、整体脂肪变性(GFDI)以及根据磁共振成像(MRI)采用Sugaya分类的肌腱完整性。

结果

在所有组中,术后活动范围均显著改善。平均Constant评分显著提高:EMSB术后从45.5提高到77.4,DLSB术后从45.5提高到87.6,DLSB + DP术后从46.3提高到88.0。术后Constant评分存在显著差异(p = 0.018:DLSB与EMSB相比,p = 0.045:DLSB + DP与EMSB相比)。DLSB + DP组的Constant疼痛评分优于EMSB组(p = 0.012)。DLSB + DP组的整体脂肪变性指数(GFDI)显著高于EMSB组或DLSB组,表明DLSB + DP组术前存在显著的脂肪变性。EMSB组再撕裂发生率为27.8%,DLSB组为12.5%,DLSB + DP组为9.1%。

讨论

三组比较表明,对于修复大型或巨大型肩袖撕裂,DLSB和DLSB + DP的临床效果优于EMSB。DLSB + DP适用于伴有严重脂肪变性的巨大型肩袖撕裂或预计在修复撕裂袖带时存在过度张力的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c426/8366389/b8df51aebb00/sicotj-7-41-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验