Suppr超能文献

在决策中同时存在的冲动和冷漠的行为特征可分离。

Dissociable behavioural signatures of co-existing impulsivity and apathy in decision-making.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK.

Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Équipe Trajectoires, Inserm UMR-S 1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Université Lyon 1, Bron, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 12;12(1):21476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25882-z.

Abstract

Apathy and impulsivity are expressed in a wide range of neuropsychiatric disorders, and, to a less severe extent, in healthy people too. Although traditionally considered to be opposite extremes of a single motivational spectrum, recent epidemiological questionnaire-based data suggest that both traits can in fact co-exist within the same individual. Here, we sought to investigate the relationship between these constructs in healthy people within a controlled task environment that examines the ability to make a decision under temporal uncertainty and measures the vigour of the response. Sixty participants performed a new version of the Traffic Light Task and completed self-report questionnaire measures of apathy and impulsivity. The task required individuals to make rapid decision-making for time-sensitive reward by squeezing a hand-held dynamometer as quickly as possible after a predictable event occurred (a traffic light turning green). Although apathy and impulsivity were positively correlated in questionnaire assessments, the two traits were associated with distinct behavioural signatures on the task. Impulsivity was expressed as an inflexible tendency to generate rapid anticipatory responses, regardless of cost-benefit information. Apathy, on the other hand, was associated with a blunted effect of reward on response vigour. These findings reveal how apathy and impulsivity are related to distinct dimensions of goal-directed behaviour, explaining how these traits might co-exist in the same individuals.

摘要

冷漠和冲动在广泛的神经精神障碍中表现出来,在健康人群中也表现出较轻的程度。尽管传统上认为它们是单一动机谱的两个极端,但最近基于问卷调查的流行病学数据表明,这两种特征实际上可以在同一个体中共存。在这里,我们试图在一个控制的任务环境中研究健康人群中这些结构之间的关系,该环境检查了在时间不确定性下做出决策的能力,并衡量了反应的活力。60 名参与者完成了新的交通信号灯任务,并完成了关于冷漠和冲动的自我报告问卷测量。任务要求个体在可预测的事件(交通信号灯变绿)发生后,通过尽可能快地挤压手持测力计,对时间敏感的奖励做出快速决策。尽管冷漠和冲动在问卷调查评估中呈正相关,但这两种特征在任务上与不同的行为特征相关联。冲动表现为一种不灵活的快速预期反应倾向,而不考虑成本效益信息。另一方面,冷漠与奖励对反应活力的影响减弱有关。这些发现揭示了冷漠和冲动如何与目标导向行为的不同维度相关,解释了这些特征如何在同一个体中共存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a89/9744918/571e4b3e4b6f/41598_2022_25882_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验