Tan Lin, Friedman Zachary, Zhou Zhengyang, Huh David, White Helene R, Mun Eun-Young
School of Public Health, The University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Center of Alcohol and Substance Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;13:993517. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993517. eCollection 2022.
Brief motivational intervention (BMI) and personalized feedback intervention (PFI) are individual-focused brief alcohol intervention approaches that have been proven efficacious for reducing alcohol use among college students and young adults. Although the efficacy of these two intervention approaches has been well established, little is known about the factors that may modify their effects on alcohol outcomes. In particular, high school drinking may be a risk factor for continued and heightened use of alcohol in college, and thus may influence the outcomes of BMI and PFI. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether high school drinking was associated with different intervention outcomes among students who received PFI compared to those who received BMI. We conducted moderation analyses examining 348 mandated students (60.1% male; 73.3% White; and 61.5% first-year student) who were randomly assigned to either a BMI or a PFI and whose alcohol consumption was assessed at 4-month and 15-month follow-ups. Results from marginalized zero-inflated Poisson models showed that high school drinking moderated the effects of PFI and BMI at the 4-month follow-up but not at the 15-month follow-up. Specifically, students who reported no drinking in their senior year of high school consumed a 49% higher mean number of drinks after receiving BMI than PFI at the 4-month follow-up. The results suggest that alcohol consumption in high school may be informative when screening and allocating students to appropriate alcohol interventions to meet their different needs.
简短动机干预(BMI)和个性化反馈干预(PFI)是以个体为重点的简短酒精干预方法,已被证明对减少大学生和年轻人的酒精使用有效。尽管这两种干预方法的有效性已得到充分证实,但对于可能改变其对酒精使用结果影响的因素却知之甚少。特别是,高中饮酒可能是大学期间持续和增加酒精使用的一个风险因素,因此可能会影响BMI和PFI的结果。本研究的目的是调查与接受BMI的学生相比,接受PFI的学生中高中饮酒是否与不同的干预结果相关。我们进行了调节分析,研究对象为348名被要求参与的学生(60.1%为男性;73.3%为白人;61.5%为一年级学生),他们被随机分配到BMI组或PFI组,并在4个月和15个月的随访中评估其酒精摄入量。边际零膨胀泊松模型的结果显示,高中饮酒在4个月随访时调节了PFI和BMI的效果,但在15个月随访时没有。具体而言,在4个月随访时,报告在高中最后一年不饮酒的学生在接受BMI后平均饮酒量比接受PFI后高49%。结果表明,在筛选学生并为其分配合适的酒精干预措施以满足其不同需求时,高中饮酒情况可能具有参考价值。