Du Xuejiao, Chen Cong, Lin Hongxin
College of Education Science, Ludong University, Yantai, China.
Department of Food and Medicine, Weihai Ocean Vocational College, Weihai, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 2;13:1027523. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027523. eCollection 2022.
Working memory capacity may be a critical factor that influences the effectiveness of collaborative learning; however, no studies have directly explored this effect. Using worked examples as learning tasks, Experiment 1 used a 2 (working memory capacity) × 2 (learning format) factorial design to examine the effects of collaborative learning versus individual learning of 4th-grade Chinese elementary school students with different working memory capacities. High-capacity learners displayed less working memory resource depletion and better transfer performance during collaborative learning than individual learning. In contrast, no differences were found among the low-capacity learners. Collaborative learning benefited high-capacity learners but not low-capacity learners, per our observations. To further optimize collaborative learning for low-capacity learners and expand the findings to heterogeneous collaborative learning, Experiment 2 adopted a 2 (member capacity) × 2 (group capacity) factorial design to explore the effects of member and group working memory capacity on collaborative learning in heterogeneous groups. High-capacity members displayed less working memory resource depletion and better far transfer performance in high-capacity groups compared to low-capacity groups. Simultaneously, all members had better near transfer performance in high-capacity groups compared to low-capacity groups. Both member and group working memory capacities influenced the effect of heterogeneous collaborative learning. However, low-capacity members only partially benefited from collaborative learning in high-capacity heterogeneous groups.
工作记忆容量可能是影响合作学习效果的关键因素;然而,尚无研究直接探讨这种影响。实验1以实例演练作为学习任务,采用2(工作记忆容量)×2(学习形式)析因设计,考察不同工作记忆容量的四年级中国小学生在合作学习与个体学习中的效果。在合作学习中,高容量学习者比个体学习时表现出更少的工作记忆资源消耗和更好的迁移表现。相比之下,低容量学习者之间未发现差异。根据我们的观察,合作学习使高容量学习者受益,但低容量学习者并未受益。为了进一步优化低容量学习者的合作学习,并将研究结果扩展到异质合作学习,实验2采用2(成员容量)×2(小组容量)析因设计,探讨成员和小组工作记忆容量对异质小组合作学习的影响。与低容量小组相比,高容量成员在高容量小组中表现出更少的工作记忆资源消耗和更好的远迁移表现。同时,与低容量小组相比,所有成员在高容量小组中都有更好的近迁移表现。成员和小组的工作记忆容量都影响了异质合作学习的效果。然而,低容量成员仅从高容量异质小组的合作学习中部分受益。