Suppr超能文献

家庭参与中的保密义务:精神障碍患者治疗中的伦理挑战及可能的解决方案。

The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders.

机构信息

Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Postboks 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.

Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04461-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family involvement during severe mental illness is still poorly implemented, contrary to evidence-based recommendations. Confidentiality issues are among the most prominent barriers, with mental health professionals facing complex ethical, legal, and practical challenges. However, research focusing on this barrier is very sparse. Nested within a cluster-randomised trial to implement guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres, the aim of this sub-study was to explore ethical challenges related to the duty of confidentiality as experienced by mental health professionals, and to explore key measures that might contribute to improving the handling of such challenges.

METHODS

In total 75 participants participated in 21 semi-structured focus groups, including implementation team members at the initial and late phase of the intervention period and clinicians who were not on the implementation teams, at late phase of implementation. We used purposive sampling and manifest content analysis to explore participants' experiences and change processes.

RESULTS

Ethical challenges related to the duty of confidentiality included 1) Uncertainty in how to apply the legislation, 2) Patient autonomy versus a less strict interpretation of the duty of confidentiality, 3) Patient alliance and beneficence versus a less strict interpretation of the duty of confidentiality, 4) How to deal with uncertainty regarding what relatives know about the patients' illness, and 5) Relatives' interests versus the duty of confidentiality. Measures to facilitate better handling of the duty of confidentiality included 1) Training and practice in family involvement, and 2) Standardisation of family involvement practices.

CONCLUSION

When health professionals gained competence in and positive experiences with family involvement, this led to vital changes in how they interpreted and practiced the duty of confidentiality in their ethical reasoning and in clinical practice. Especially, the need to provide sufficient information to the patients about family involvement became evident during the study. To improve the handling of confidentiality issues, professionals should receive training in family involvement and confidentiality statutes followed by practice. Furthermore, family involvement should be standardised, and confidentiality guidelines should be implemented in the mental health services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177. Registered 11.03.19.

摘要

背景

尽管有循证建议,但在严重精神疾病患者的家庭参与方面仍执行不力。保密性问题是最突出的障碍之一,精神卫生专业人员面临着复杂的伦理、法律和实际挑战。然而,针对这一障碍的研究非常匮乏。在一项旨在实施社区精神卫生中心精神障碍患者家庭参与指南的整群随机试验中,嵌套了这项子研究,旨在探讨精神卫生专业人员在保密性义务方面所面临的伦理挑战,并探讨有助于改善处理此类挑战的关键措施。

方法

共有 75 名参与者参加了 21 次半结构焦点小组讨论,包括干预期间初始和后期的实施团队成员以及未参与实施团队的临床医生,他们在实施后期参加了焦点小组讨论。我们使用了目的性抽样和显性内容分析法来探讨参与者的经验和变化过程。

结果

与保密性义务相关的伦理挑战包括:1)对如何适用立法的不确定性,2)患者自主权与对保密性义务的较宽松解释,3)患者联盟和善意与对保密性义务的较宽松解释,4)如何处理亲属对患者病情了解程度的不确定性,以及 5)亲属利益与保密性义务。有助于更好地处理保密性义务的措施包括:1)家庭参与培训和实践,以及 2)家庭参与实践的标准化。

结论

当卫生专业人员在家庭参与方面获得了能力和积极经验时,这导致他们在伦理推理和临床实践中对保密性义务的解释和实践发生了重大变化。特别是,在研究期间,需要向患者提供有关家庭参与的充分信息。为了改善保密性问题的处理,专业人员应接受家庭参与和保密性法规的培训,然后进行实践。此外,应使家庭参与标准化,并在精神卫生服务中实施保密性准则。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT03869177。注册于 19 年 3 月 11 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e427/9764492/dadfb11280fe/12888_2022_4461_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验