Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Social Research, Trondheim, Norway.
Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;10:960815. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.960815. eCollection 2022.
Despite evidence on the significant potential value of family involvement during the treatment of patients with severe mental illness, research has shown that family involvement is largely underused. The duty of confidentiality is reported to be a key barrier to family involvement. To develop more insight into this barrier, this scoping review focuses on the following question: What are the reported ethical challenges related to confidentiality when involving family in the treatment of patients with severe mental illness?
A systematic search into primary studies was conducted using the following databases: Medline (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science core collection (Clarivate). The PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) scheme and qualitative content analysis were used to make the ethical challenges more explicit.
Twelve studies-both qualitative and quantitative-were included. We identified the following main categories of ethical challenges: (1) the best interest of family members vs. confidentiality, (2) the patient's best interest vs. the right to confidentiality, (3) patient trust and alliance as a reason not to involve the relatives or not to share information, and (4) using confidentiality as a smokescreen. We also identified several subcategories and illustrative and concrete examples of ethical challenges.
Through a systematic examination, we discovered various types of ethical challenges related to confidentiality when involving the family in the treatment of patients with severe mental illness. However, research on these ethical challenges and the constituents of these challenges remains limited and often implicit. An ethical analysis will create knowledge which may facilitate a more balanced and nuanced approach to respecting the principle of confidentiality while also considering other moral principles. The duty of confidentiality does not always have to be a major barrier to family involvement; this insight and using this ethical analysis in the training of healthcare professionals may benefit the patient, the family, and the services.
尽管有证据表明在治疗严重精神疾病患者时让家庭成员参与具有重要的潜在价值,但研究表明,家庭成员的参与度在很大程度上未得到充分利用。据报道,保密性义务是阻碍家庭成员参与的一个关键因素。为了更深入地了解这一障碍,本范围界定综述聚焦于以下问题:在让家庭成员参与治疗严重精神疾病患者的过程中,与保密性相关的报告伦理挑战有哪些?
使用以下数据库对原始研究进行了系统检索:Medline(Ovid)、PsycINFO(Ovid)、CINAHL(EBSCO)和 Web of Science 核心合集(Clarivate)。采用 PICO(人群、干预、比较、结局)方案和定性内容分析使伦理挑战更加明确。
共纳入 12 项研究,包括定性和定量研究。我们确定了以下主要类别的伦理挑战:(1)家庭成员的最佳利益与保密性,(2)患者的最佳利益与保密权,(3)患者的信任和联盟是不告知亲属或不分享信息的原因,(4)利用保密性作为挡箭牌。我们还确定了一些亚类和伦理挑战的具体示例。
通过系统检查,我们发现了在让家庭成员参与治疗严重精神疾病患者的过程中与保密性相关的各种类型的伦理挑战。然而,对这些伦理挑战及其构成要素的研究仍然有限,且往往是隐含的。伦理分析将产生知识,这可能有助于在尊重保密性原则的同时,更好地平衡和细致地考虑其他道德原则。保密性义务并不总是家庭成员参与的主要障碍;这种洞察力和在医疗保健专业人员的培训中使用这种伦理分析,可能有利于患者、家庭和服务。