Mezghani Nourhen, Ammar Achraf, Boukhris Omar, Abid Rihab, Hadadi Atyh, Alzahrani Turki Mohsen, Trabelsi Omar, Boujelbane Mohamed Ali, Masmoudi Liwa, Ouergui Ibrahim, Jamoussi Kamel, Mnif Mouna, Mejdoub Hafedh, Zmijewski Piotr, Glenn Jordan M, Trabelsi Khaled, Chtourou Hamdi
Department of Sport Sciences, College of Education, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 14;10(12):2533. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122533.
Abdominal obesity has emerged globally as a major public health issue due to its high prevalence and morbidity. The benefits of physical exercise among the obese population are well documented. However, the optimal exercise intensity for reducing body fat and preventing insulin resistance and metabolic disorders is still under debate. This study aimed to examine the effects of three different intensities of combined endurance and strength training programs on anthropometric variables, physiological and muscular adaptations, and insulin sensitivity. Forty-three obese young women (age 26.4 ± 4.7 years, BMI 33.1 ± 2.5 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to one of four groups: a control group (G0), a moderate-intensity training group (G50, exercising brisk walking at 50% heart rate reserve HRR), a high-intensity training group (G75, exercise jogging at 75% HRR), and an alternated-intensity training group (G50/75, exercise brisk-walking/jogging at 50−75% HRR) with additional strength training once a week for each group. Body composition, waist circumference (WC), fasting blood glucose, insulin sensitivity and resistance (Homa-IR), resting heart rate (RHR), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), 1-repetition maximum (1-RM), and time to exhaustion (TTE) at 45% and 75% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for both the flexor and extensor muscle groups of the knees, were recorded before and after three months of exercise training. All training groups showed significant decreases in body mass, BMI, total body fat, body fat percentage, WC, abdominal and visceral mass (p < 0.001), with a greater reduction of body mass and BMI in G75 (p < 0.05). Lean mass increased significantly only in G50/75 (p < 0.05). The insulin sensitivity and Homa-IR decreased in the three training groups (p < 0.01), with greater enhanced resistance in G50 compared to G75 and G50/75 (p < 0.05). In contrast, there were no pre-post changes in all groups for fasting blood glucose (p > 0.05). 1-RM and TTE of the knee flexor and extensor muscles were improved in the three groups (p < 0.01), with greater improvement in G50/75 for 1RM and G75 in most of the TTE parameters (p < 0.05). RHR decreased and 6MWD increased significantly in the three training groups (p < 0.01), with greater 6MWD improvement in G75 (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the three training intensities seem to generate benefits in terms of body composition, physiological and muscular adaptations, and insulin resistance. High training intensity resulted in greater improvements in body mass, BMI, and endurance and strength, whereas moderate training intensity resulted in greater improvements of insulin resistance and homo-IR. Following alternate-intensity training, greater improvements were observed in lean mass and maximal strength performance.
由于腹部肥胖的高患病率和高发病率,它已成为全球主要的公共卫生问题。体育锻炼对肥胖人群的益处已有充分记录。然而,关于减少体脂、预防胰岛素抵抗和代谢紊乱的最佳运动强度仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨三种不同强度的耐力与力量相结合的训练方案对人体测量学变量、生理和肌肉适应性以及胰岛素敏感性的影响。43名肥胖年轻女性(年龄26.4±4.7岁,体重指数33.1±2.5kg/m²)被随机分为四组:对照组(G0)、中等强度训练组(G50,以心率储备(HRR)的50%进行快走锻炼)、高强度训练组(G75,以HRR的75%进行慢跑锻炼)以及交替强度训练组(G50/75,以50 - 75%HRR进行快走/慢跑锻炼),每组每周额外进行一次力量训练。在进行三个月的运动训练前后,记录身体成分、腰围(WC)、空腹血糖、胰岛素敏感性和抵抗(稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数(Homa-IR))、静息心率(RHR)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、一次重复最大重量(1-RM)以及膝关节屈伸肌群在45%和75%最大自主收缩(MVC)时的疲劳时间(TTE)。所有训练组的体重、体重指数、全身脂肪、体脂百分比、WC、腹部和内脏质量均显著下降(p<0.001),G75组的体重和体重指数下降幅度更大(p<0.05)。仅G50/75组的去脂体重显著增加(p<0.05)。三个训练组的胰岛素敏感性和Homa-IR均下降(p<0.01),与G75组和G50/75组相比,G50组的胰岛素抵抗改善更为明显(p<0.05)。相比之下,所有组的空腹血糖在训练前后均无变化(p>0.05)。三个组膝关节屈伸肌的1-RM和TTE均得到改善(p<0.01),G50/75组的1-RM改善更为明显,G75组在大多数TTE参数上改善更大(p<0.05)。三个训练组的RHR下降,6MWD显著增加(p<0.01),G75组的6MWD改善更为明显(p<0.05)。总之,三种训练强度似乎在身体成分、生理和肌肉适应性以及胰岛素抵抗方面都产生了益处。高训练强度在体重、体重指数、耐力和力量方面带来了更大的改善,而中等训练强度在胰岛素抵抗和Homa-IR方面带来了更大的改善。进行交替强度训练后,去脂体重和最大力量表现有更大的改善。