• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价中国农业可持续性与绿色 GDP:能值分析。

Evaluating Agricultural Sustainability and Green GDP in China: An Emergy Analysis.

机构信息

Chongqing Academy of Social Sciences, Chongqing 400020, China.

School of Business, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16735. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416735.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192416735
PMID:36554615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9779607/
Abstract

Agricultural sustainability is the foundation and a guarantee of sustainable human reproduction. The scientific assessment of China's agricultural sustainability is a prerequisite for properly resolving the conflict between short-term economic interests and long-term ecological security. This paper uses the emergy analysis method to estimate agricultural sustainability in China and further calculates the agricultural environmental cost and green GDP. The results show that China's agricultural emergy yield rate (EYR) is generally greater than 1. This means that more emergy is obtained in relation to renewable and non-renewable inputs from human activity, which also indicates that China's agricultural agroecosystem is characteristic of a profound transition from a self-supporting tradition to a modern industry based on external economic resource consumption. In contrast, China's agricultural growth is mainly driven by the input of a large amount of non-renewable resources, which makes the environmental loading rate (ELR) increase year by year, resulting in the deterioration of China's agricultural emergy sustainability index (ESI). China's agricultural green GDP accounts for about 94.4% of traditional GDP, which means that the average agricultural environmental cost is about 5.6%, mainly from land loss, accounting for 48.23% of the environmental cost.

摘要

农业可持续性是可持续人类繁衍的基础和保证。科学评估中国农业的可持续性是妥善解决短期经济利益与长期生态安全之间冲突的前提。本文采用能值分析方法评估了中国农业的可持续性,并进一步计算了农业环境成本和绿色 GDP。结果表明,中国农业的能值产投比(EYR)普遍大于 1。这意味着与可再生和不可再生投入相比,人类活动从环境中获取了更多的能值,这也表明中国的农业农业生态系统正从自给自足的传统向基于外部经济资源消耗的现代产业转型。相比之下,中国农业的增长主要是由大量不可再生资源的投入驱动的,这使得环境负载率(ELR)逐年增加,导致中国农业能值可持续性指数(ESI)恶化。中国农业的绿色 GDP 约占传统 GDP 的 94.4%,这意味着平均农业环境成本约为 5.6%,主要来自土地流失,占环境成本的 48.23%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/cd33aae3bd89/ijerph-19-16735-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/42745d52d589/ijerph-19-16735-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/d58d35e40cbb/ijerph-19-16735-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/2fa718fde2ac/ijerph-19-16735-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/31be88b95a08/ijerph-19-16735-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/99066f9ad0b9/ijerph-19-16735-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/cd33aae3bd89/ijerph-19-16735-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/42745d52d589/ijerph-19-16735-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/d58d35e40cbb/ijerph-19-16735-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/2fa718fde2ac/ijerph-19-16735-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/31be88b95a08/ijerph-19-16735-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/99066f9ad0b9/ijerph-19-16735-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea63/9779607/cd33aae3bd89/ijerph-19-16735-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Agricultural Sustainability and Green GDP in China: An Emergy Analysis.评价中国农业可持续性与绿色 GDP:能值分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16735. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416735.
2
Assessing the sustainability of ecosystems over fourteen years of cultivation in Longnan City of China based on emergy analysis method.基于能值分析方法评估中国陇南地区 14 年的生态系统可持续性。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 1;307:114513. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114513. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
3
[Emergy analysis on different planting patterns of typical watersheds in Loess Plateau.].[黄土高原典型流域不同种植模式的能值分析。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 May;27(5):1576-1584. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.018.
4
Comparison of the sustainability of bean production systems based on emergy and economic analyses.基于能值和经济分析的豆类生产系统可持续性比较。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Dec 4;191(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7123-3.
5
Emergy evaluation of a production and utilization process of irrigation water in China.中国灌溉水生产与利用过程的能值评估
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Sep 2;2013:438317. doi: 10.1155/2013/438317. eCollection 2013.
6
Emergy unsustainability index for agricultural systems assessment: A proposal based on the laws of thermodynamics.农业系统评估的能值可持续性指数:基于热力学定律的建议。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 10;759:143524. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143524. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
7
Ecological and economic dynamics of the Shunde agricultural system under China's small city development strategy.中国小城市发展战略下顺德农业系统的生态与经济动态
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;90(8):2589-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.019. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
8
[Emergy analysis of agro-ecolomic system in Shanxi Province].[山西省农业生态经济系统的能值分析]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2008 Oct;19(10):2259-64.
9
Emergy accounting for regional studies: case study of Canada and its provinces.能区分析在区域研究中的应用:以加拿大及其省份为例。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Mar 30;118:177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.034. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
10
Evaluation of resources and environmental carrying capacity of marine ranching in China: An integrated life cycle assessment-emergy analysis.中国海洋牧场资源环境承载力评价:生命周期评价-能值分析集成方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 15;856(Pt 1):159102. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159102. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the nonpoint source pollution loads' spatiotemporal dynamic response to intensive land use in rural China.理解中国农村高强度土地利用下非点源污染负荷的时空动态响应。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 1;315:115066. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115066. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
World agricultural convergence.世界农业趋同。
J Product Anal. 2021;55(2):135-153. doi: 10.1007/s11123-021-00600-5. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Assessment and analysis of agricultural non-point source pollution loads in China: 1978-2017.中国农业面源污染负荷的评估与分析:1978-2017 年。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 1;263:110400. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110400. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
Emergy and eco-exergy evaluation of wetland restoration based on the construction of a wetland landscape in the northwest Yunnan Plateau, China.基于中国滇西北高原湿地景观建设的湿地恢复能值与生态经济评价。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 15;252:109499. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109499. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
5
Agricultural environmental total factor productivity in China under technological heterogeneity: characteristics and determinants.中国技术异质性下的农业环境全要素生产率:特征与决定因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(32):32096-32111. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3142-4. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Reduction potential, shadow prices, and pollution costs of agricultural pollutants in China.中国农业污染物的还原潜力、影子价格和污染成本。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;541:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Sep 19.