Suppr超能文献

评估儿科人群久坐行为障碍和促进因素的问卷的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。

Validity and Reliability of Questionnaires That Assess Barriers and Facilitators of Sedentary Behavior in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-904, Brazil.

Undergraduate Course in Nutrition, Ninth of July University, Sao Paulo 01504-001, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416834.

Abstract

We systematically reviewed the literature about the validity and reliability of barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior questionnaires for children and adolescents, considering accelerometers as the reference method. We included studies that assessed the agreement between the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior through a questionnaire and an objective measure (e.g., accelerometry). We searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS): these databases were searched for records from inception to 5 March 2021, and updated to November 2022. The search strategy used the following descriptors: children and adolescents; barriers or facilitators; questionnaires; accelerometers; and validation or reliability coefficient. Studies identified in the search were selected independently by two reviewers. The inclusion criteria were: (i) population of children and adolescents, (ii) original studies, (iii) subjective and objective measurement methods, (iv) studies that report validity or reliability, and (v) population without specific diseases. Seven studies were eligible for our review. The main exclusion reasons were studies that did not report validity or reliability coefficients (56.6%) and non-original studies (14.5%). The participants' ages in the primary studies ranged from 2 to 18 years. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was the most reported reliability assessment among the eligible articles, while Pearson and Spearman's coefficients were prevalent for validity. The reliability of self-report questionnaires for assessing sedentary behavior ranged from r = 0.3 to 1.0. The validity of the accelerometers ranged from r = -0.1 to 0.9. Family environment was the main factor associated with sedentary behavior. Our findings suggest that questionnaires assessing the barriers and facilitators of sedentary behavior are weak to moderate. PROSPERO Registration (CRD42021233945).

摘要

我们系统地回顾了关于儿童和青少年久坐行为问卷的有效性和可靠性的文献,同时将加速度计作为参考方法。我们纳入了评估久坐行为问卷与客观测量(如加速度计)之间一致性的研究。我们在四个电子数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 SCOPUS)中进行了检索:这些数据库从建库起至 2021 年 3 月 5 日进行了检索,并更新至 2022 年 11 月。检索策略使用了以下术语:儿童和青少年;障碍或促进因素;问卷;加速度计;验证或可靠性系数。由两名评审员独立筛选检索到的研究。纳入标准为:(i)儿童和青少年人群;(ii)原始研究;(iii)主观和客观测量方法;(iv)报告有效性或可靠性的研究;(v)无特定疾病的人群。共有 7 项研究符合我们的综述标准。主要排除原因是未报告有效性或可靠性系数的研究(56.6%)和非原始研究(14.5%)。主要研究参与者的年龄范围为 2 至 18 岁。克朗巴赫α系数是合格文章中最常报告的可靠性评估,而皮尔逊和斯皮尔曼系数则常用于有效性评估。用于评估久坐行为的自报问卷的可靠性范围为 r = 0.3 至 1.0。加速度计的有效性范围为 r = -0.1 至 0.9。家庭环境是与久坐行为最相关的主要因素。我们的研究结果表明,评估久坐行为障碍和促进因素的问卷的可靠性为弱至中等。PROSPERO 注册号(CRD42021233945)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/125b/9778761/9925d82680e2/ijerph-19-16834-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验