Katayama Osamu, Lee Sangyoon, Bae Seongryu, Makino Keitaro, Chiba Ippei, Harada Kenji, Morikawa Masanori, Tomida Kouki, Shimada Hiroyuki
Department of Preventive Gerontology, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-cho, Obu City 474-8511, Aichi, Japan.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Chiyoda 102-0083, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 15;11(24):7441. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247441.
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in older adults has been identified as a risk factor for dementia. However, the literature is inconsistent, and the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. We aimed to determine whether older adults with SCD had more modifiable protective factors against the risk of dementia and a lower risk of developing objective cognitive decline (OCD). We included 4363 older adults (71.7 ± 5.3 [mean ± standard deviation] years of age; 2239 women) from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Study of Geriatric Syndromes. SCD, OCD, and protective factors against dementia, such as lifestyle and activity, were assessed using interviews and objective cognitive-assessment tools. Based on initial cognitive status, participants were categorized into normal cognition, SCD-only, OCD-only, and both SCD and OCD groups. After 4 years, participants were classified as having either no impairment or mild or global cognitive impairment (i.e., OCD). Binomial logistic regression analyses were performed with the cognitive statuses of the groups at follow-up and baseline as the dependent and independent variables, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we found that the SCD-only group had more modifiable protective factors against the risk of dementia than the OCD-only group. Community-dwelling older adults with normal cognition or those part of the SCD-only group had a lower risk of developing OCD during the 4-year follow-up, which may have been due to having more modifiable protective factors against the risk of dementia. Additionally, these factors may contribute to the inconsistencies in the literature on SCD outcomes.
老年人的主观认知下降(SCD)已被确定为痴呆症的一个风险因素。然而,文献报道并不一致,其潜在机制也尚未得到充分理解。我们旨在确定患有SCD的老年人是否具有更多可改变的痴呆症风险保护因素,以及发生客观认知下降(OCD)的风险是否更低。我们纳入了来自国立老年医学和老年学老年综合征研究中心的4363名老年人(年龄71.7±5.3[均值±标准差]岁;女性2239名)。使用访谈和客观认知评估工具对SCD、OCD以及痴呆症的保护因素(如生活方式和活动)进行了评估。根据初始认知状态,参与者被分为正常认知、仅SCD、仅OCD以及SCD和OCD两组。4年后,参与者被分类为无损伤或有轻度或整体认知损伤(即OCD)。分别以随访时和基线时各组的认知状态作为因变量和自变量进行二项逻辑回归分析。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,我们发现仅SCD组比仅OCD组具有更多可改变的痴呆症风险保护因素。认知正常的社区居住老年人或仅SCD组的老年人在4年随访期间发生OCD的风险较低,这可能是由于他们具有更多可改变的痴呆症风险保护因素。此外,这些因素可能导致了关于SCD结果的文献存在不一致之处。