Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Hernández (ISABIAL-UMH), 03010 Alicante, Spain.
Unidad de Epidemiología de la Nutrición, Departamento de Salud Pública, Historia de la Ciencia y Ginecología, Universidad Miguel Hernández (UMH), 03550 Alicante, Spain.
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 12;14(24):5288. doi: 10.3390/nu14245288.
We aimed to evaluate the association between three previously defined pro-vegetarian (PVG) food patterns and the cancers of the oesophagus, stomach, and pancreas in a multi case-control study. We analyzed data from a multi-case hospital-based study carried out in two Mediterranean provinces in Spain. A total of 1233 participants were included in the analyses: 778 incident cancer cases, histologically confirmed (199 oesophagus, 414 stomach, and 165 pancreas) and 455 controls. A dietary assessment was performed using a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Three PVG food patterns (general, healthful, and unhealthful) were estimated using 12 food groups for the general PVG (gPVG), scoring positive plant-based foods and negative animal-based foods, and 18 food groups, for the healthful (hPVG) and unhealthful (uPVG) food patterns. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate relative risk ratios (RRR) and confidence intervals (95% CI) for quintiles of adherence to PVG patterns and as a continuous variable. The RRR (95% CI) for the highest vs. the lowest quintile of gPVG were, RRR = 0.37 (0.32, 0.42) for the oesophagus, RRR = 0.34 (0.27, 0.43) for the stomach, and RRR = 0.43 (0.35, 0.52) for pancreas cancer. For the hPVG, the RRR were RRR = 0.72 (0.58, 0.90) for the oesophagus, RRR = 0.42 (0.34, 0.52) for the stomach, and RRR = 0.74 (0.59, 0.92) for pancreas cancer. The uPVG was associated with a higher risk of stomach cancer RRR = 1.76 (1.42, 2.18). Higher adherence to gPVG and hPVG food patterns is associated with a lower risk of oesophageal, stomach, and pancreas cancers, while a higher adherence to a uPVG food pattern is associated with a higher risk of stomach cancer.
我们旨在通过一项多病例对照研究评估三种先前定义的素食相关食物模式(PVG)与食管、胃和胰腺癌症之间的关联。我们分析了在西班牙两个地中海省份进行的一项多病例医院基础研究的数据。共有 1233 名参与者被纳入分析:778 例新发病例癌症,组织学证实(199 例食管、414 例胃和 165 例胰腺)和 455 例对照。使用经过验证的食物频率问卷(FFQ)进行饮食评估。使用 12 种食物组估计三种 PVG 食物模式(一般、健康和不健康),对一般 PVG(gPVG)评分阳性植物性食物和阴性动物性食物,对健康(hPVG)和不健康(uPVG)食物模式使用 18 种食物组。使用多项逻辑回归估计 PVG 模式依从性五分位数和连续变量的相对风险比(RRR)和置信区间(95%CI)。与 gPVG 最低五分位相比,最高五分位的 RRR(95%CI)分别为食管癌的 RRR=0.37(0.32,0.42)、胃癌的 RRR=0.34(0.27,0.43)和胰腺癌的 RRR=0.43(0.35,0.52)。对于 hPVG,RRR 分别为食管癌的 RRR=0.72(0.58,0.90)、胃癌的 RRR=0.42(0.34,0.52)和胰腺癌的 RRR=0.74(0.59,0.92)。uPVG 与胃癌风险增加相关,RRR=1.76(1.42,2.18)。gPVG 和 hPVG 食物模式的较高依从性与食管、胃和胰腺癌症的较低风险相关,而 uPVG 食物模式的较高依从性与胃癌的较高风险相关。