• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Will WHO Labor Care Guide have a positive effect on objectively measured health outcomes as well as patient reported measures?

作者信息

Bhide Amar, Øian Pål, Acharya Ganesh

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jan;102(1):4-6. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14479.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.14479
PMID:36562192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9780716/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Will WHO Labor Care Guide have a positive effect on objectively measured health outcomes as well as patient reported measures?世界卫生组织的《分娩护理指南》会对客观测量的健康结果以及患者报告的指标产生积极影响吗？
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jan;102(1):4-6. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14479.
2
The effect of Zhang's guideline vs the WHO partograph on childbirth experience measured by the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire in the Labor Progression Study (LaPS): A cluster randomized trial.张的指南与世界卫生组织产程图对分娩体验的影响：以分娩进展研究（LaPS）中的分娩体验问卷为衡量标准：一项整群随机试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Feb;101(2):193-199. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14298. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Assessing effective care in normal labor: the Bologna score.评估正常分娩中的有效护理：博洛尼亚评分
Birth. 2001 Jun;28(2):79-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00079.x.
4
Good practices according to WHO's recommendation for normal labor and birth and women's assessment of the care received: the "birth in Brazil" national research study, 2011/2012.根据世界卫生组织关于正常分娩及妇女对所获护理评估的建议的良好做法：2011/2012年“巴西分娩”全国性研究。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):124. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0233-x.
5
Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: A mixed-methods, multicountry evaluation.世卫组织劳工保健指南的可用性、可接受性和可行性：一项混合方法、多国评价。
Birth. 2021 Mar;48(1):66-75. doi: 10.1111/birt.12511. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
6
The partograph for the prevention of obstructed labor.预防产程梗阻的产程图。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;52(2):256-69. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181a4f163.
7
WHO next-generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labour care.世界卫生组织下一代产程图：迈向个性化分娩护理的革命性举措。
BJOG. 2021 Sep;128(10):1658-1662. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16694. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
8
The development of the WHO Labour Care Guide: an international survey of maternity care providers.世卫组织劳工保健指南的制定：产妇保健提供者国际调查。
Reprod Health. 2021 Mar 22;18(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01074-2.
9
Impact of a labor and delivery safety bundle on a modified adverse outcomes index.分娩安全包对改良不良结局指数的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):401.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.155. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
WHO next-generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labour care?世界卫生组织下一代产程图：迈向个性化分娩护理的革命性举措？
BJOG. 2022 Apr;129(5):682-684. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16914. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing the WHO Labour Care Guide to reduce the use of Caesarean section in four hospitals in India: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial.实施世卫组织劳工关爱指南以减少印度四家医院的剖宫产率：一项实用、阶梯式、群组随机试点试验的方案和统计分析计划。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01525-4.
2
Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: A mixed-methods, multicountry evaluation.世卫组织劳工保健指南的可用性、可接受性和可行性：一项混合方法、多国评价。
Birth. 2021 Mar;48(1):66-75. doi: 10.1111/birt.12511. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
3
The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial.《在 Labour Progression Study (LaPS) 中，使用 WHO 产程图与 Zhang 指南比较的产时剖宫产频率：一项多中心、整群随机对照试验》
Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):340-348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31991-3. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
Duration of spontaneous labour in 'low-risk' women with 'normal' perinatal outcomes: A systematic review.围产期结局“正常”的“低风险”女性自然分娩的时长：一项系统综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Apr;223:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
5
Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review.自发性分娩且围产结局正常的“低危”孕妇的宫颈扩张模式：系统评价。
BJOG. 2018 Jul;125(8):944-954. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14930. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
6
Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.具有正常新生儿结局的自发性分娩的当代模式。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1281-1287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e.
7
Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. II. The action line and treatment of abnormal labour.初产妇分娩管理中的子宫颈扩张图。II. 产程异常的作用线及处理
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972 Jul;79(7):599-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb14208.x.
8
Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. I. The alert line for detecting abnormal labour.初产妇分娩管理中的宫颈扩张图。I. 检测异常分娩的警戒值。
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972 Jul;79(7):592-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb14207.x.