• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心调查,研究阴茎假体感染管理的时机及相关病原体。

A multicenter investigation examining timing of penile prosthesis infection management and responsible organisms.

作者信息

Rezaee Michael E, Swanton Amanda R, Gross Martin S, Munarriz Ricardo M

机构信息

The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

Department of Urology, Boston University Medical Center, 725 Albany St, 3rd Floor, Suite B, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

出版信息

Int J Impot Res. 2024 May;36(3):214-217. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00659-0. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1038/s41443-022-00659-0
PMID:36564583
Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the timing of penile prosthesis infection management by different responsible organisms. A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who underwent penile prosthesis salvage or explant procedures due to a suspected infection between 2001 and 2018. The cohort consisted of 216 patients from 33 different facilities and six countries. The most common primary organisms responsible for device infections included, Gram-positives (31.5%), no growth cultures (30.6%), Gram-negatives (22.2%), fungal (11.6%), and anaerobic organisms (4.2%). Overall, median time to infection was 1.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0-3.0) months for all patients. Median time to infection management was similar between responsible organisms: 1.0 (IQR: 1.0-2.3) months for Gram-negatives and 2 months for Gram-positives (IQR: 1.0-1.4), fungal (IQR: 1.0-5.0), anaerobes (IQR: 1.0-2.5), and no growth cultures (IQR: 1.0-3.0, p = 0.56). Median time to infection management was significantly shorter among patients who received aminoglycoside/vancomycin prophylaxis (1.5 months, IQR: 1.0-2.5, p < 0.01) compared to other antibiotic groups. Median time to infection management was significantly longer for patients managed with a three-piece inflatable implant salvage procedure (2.8 months, IQR: 1.0-5.0, p = 0.02) compared to other salvage procedures. Conventional wisdom surrounding early versus late penile prosthesis infections should largely be abandoned. More than half of penile prosthesis infections are surgically managed within 2 months of initial device placement.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨不同致病微生物导致阴茎假体感染时的处理时机。对2001年至2018年间因疑似感染而接受阴茎假体挽救或取出手术的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。该队列包括来自33个不同机构和6个国家的216名患者。导致器械感染的最常见主要微生物包括革兰氏阳性菌(31.5%)、培养无生长(30.6%)、革兰氏阴性菌(22.2%)、真菌(11.6%)和厌氧菌(4.2%)。总体而言,所有患者感染的中位时间为1.8个月(四分位间距[IQR]:1.0 - 3.0)。不同致病微生物导致感染的处理中位时间相似:革兰氏阴性菌为1.0个月(IQR:1.0 - 2.3),革兰氏阳性菌为2个月(IQR:1.0 - 1.4),真菌为2个月(IQR:1.0 - 5.0),厌氧菌为2个月(IQR:1.0 - 2.5),培养无生长为2个月(IQR:1.0 - 3.0,p = 0.56)。与其他抗生素组相比,接受氨基糖苷类/万古霉素预防的患者感染处理中位时间显著缩短(1.5个月,IQR:1.0 - 2.5,p < 0.01)。与其他挽救手术相比,采用三件式可膨胀植入物挽救手术处理的患者感染处理中位时间显著延长(2.8个月,IQR:1.0 - 5.0,p = 0.02)。关于阴茎假体早期感染与晚期感染的传统观念应基本摒弃。超过一半的阴茎假体感染在初次植入装置后2个月内通过手术处理。

相似文献

1
A multicenter investigation examining timing of penile prosthesis infection management and responsible organisms.一项多中心调查,研究阴茎假体感染管理的时机及相关病原体。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 May;36(3):214-217. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00659-0. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
2
Multicenter Investigation of the Micro-Organisms Involved in Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the AUA and EAU Guidelines for Penile Prosthesis Prophylaxis.阴茎假体感染相关微生物的多中心调查:对美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)和欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)阴茎假体预防指南疗效的分析
J Sex Med. 2017 Mar;14(3):455-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
3
Multicenter Investigation of Fungal Infections of Inflatable Penile Prostheses.多中心调查充气式阴茎假体真菌感染。
J Sex Med. 2019 Jul;16(7):1100-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.05.003.
4
Timing and causative organisms associated with modern inflatable penile prosthesis infection: an institutional retrospective.与现代可膨胀阴茎假体感染相关的时间及致病微生物:一项机构回顾性研究
J Sex Med. 2023 Jan 14;20(1):107-112. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdac001.
5
A Multicenter Investigation Examining American Urological Association Recommended Antibiotic Prophylaxis vs Nonstandard Prophylaxis in Preventing Device Infections in Penile Prosthesis Surgery in Diabetic Patients.一项多中心研究调查了美国泌尿外科学会推荐的抗生素预防方案与非标准预防方案在预防糖尿病患者阴茎假体手术中器械相关感染的效果。
J Urol. 2020 Nov;204(5):969-975. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001158. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
6
Antibiotic coating reduces penile prosthesis infection.抗生素涂层可降低阴茎假体感染率。
J Sex Med. 2005 Jul;2(4):565-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00073.x.
7
Immediate salvage procedure for infected penile prosthesis.感染性阴茎假体的即刻挽救手术
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):816-8.
8
Penile Prosthesis Infections-A Review of Risk Factors, Prevention, and Treatment.阴茎假体感染——风险因素、预防和治疗的综述。
Sex Med Rev. 2016 Oct;4(4):389-398. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 May 13.
9
Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.阴茎假体植入术后的长期随访——生存和生活质量结果。
J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1827-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
The Malleable Implant Salvage Technique: Infection Outcomes after Mulcahy Salvage Procedure and Replacement of Infected Inflatable Penile Prosthesis with Malleable Prosthesis.可塑型植入物挽救技术:马尔卡希挽救手术后的感染结果以及用可塑型假体替换感染的可膨胀阴茎假体后的情况
J Urol. 2016 Mar;195(3):694-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.091. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Narrative review of immediate salvage for penile prosthesis infection.阴茎假体感染即刻挽救治疗的叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Apr 30;13(4):584-595. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-277. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Microorganism Profiles of Penile Prosthesis Removed for Infection, Erosion, and Mechanical Malfunction Based on Next-Generation Sequencing.基于下一代测序技术的因感染、侵蚀及机械故障而移除的阴茎假体的微生物谱分析
J Sex Med. 2022 Feb;19(2):356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.11.014. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
2
A systematic review of penile prosthesis infection and meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus role.阴茎假体感染的系统评价及糖尿病作用的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00730-2.
3
A Multicenter Investigation Examining American Urological Association Recommended Antibiotic Prophylaxis vs Nonstandard Prophylaxis in Preventing Device Infections in Penile Prosthesis Surgery in Diabetic Patients.
一项多中心研究调查了美国泌尿外科学会推荐的抗生素预防方案与非标准预防方案在预防糖尿病患者阴茎假体手术中器械相关感染的效果。
J Urol. 2020 Nov;204(5):969-975. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001158. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
Updates in penile prosthesis infections.阴茎假体感染的最新进展。
Asian J Androl. 2020 Jan-Feb;22(1):28-33. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_84_19.
5
Penile prosthesis biofilm formation and emerging therapies against them.阴茎假体生物膜形成及针对其的新兴治疗方法。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Dec;7(6):960-967. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.09.05.
6
Post-operative antibiotics following placement of a penile prosthesis.阴茎假体植入术后使用抗生素。
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Nov;6(Suppl 5):S774-S775. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.11.14.
7
Biofilm and Infectious Agents Present at the Time of Penile Prosthesis Revision Surgery: Times Are a Changing.在阴茎假体修复手术时出现的生物膜和感染因子:时代在变化。
Sex Med Rev. 2017 Apr;5(2):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
Multicenter Investigation of the Micro-Organisms Involved in Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the AUA and EAU Guidelines for Penile Prosthesis Prophylaxis.阴茎假体感染相关微生物的多中心调查:对美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)和欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)阴茎假体预防指南疗效的分析
J Sex Med. 2017 Mar;14(3):455-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
9
Prosthetic joint infection.人工关节感染
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Apr;27(2):302-45. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-13.
10
Pathogenic organisms in hip joint infections.髋关节感染的病原体。
Int J Med Sci. 2009 Sep 2;6(5):234-40. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6.234.