The Pennsylvania State University, USA.
The Pennsylvania State University, USA.
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Jan;93:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102662. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
The contrast avoidance model (CAM) proposes that persons with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are sensitive to sharp increases in negative emotion or decreases in positive emotion (i.e., negative emotional contrasts; NEC) and use worry to avoid NEC. Sensitivity to and avoidance of NEC could also be a shared feature of major depressive disorder (MDD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD).
In a large college sample (N = 1409), we used receiver operating characteristics analysis to examine the accuracy of a measure of emotional contrast avoidance in detecting probable GAD, MDD, and SAD.
Participants with probable GAD, MDD, and SAD all reported higher levels of contrast avoidance than participants without the disorder (Cohen's d = 1.32, 1.62 and 1.53, respectively). Area under the curve, a measure of predictive accuracy, was 0.81, 0.87, and 0.83 for predicting probable GAD, MDD, and SAD, respectively. A cutoff score of 48.5 optimized predictive accuracy for probable GAD and SAD, and 50.5 optimized accuracy for probable MDD.
A measure of emotional contrast avoidance demonstrated excellent ability to predict probable GAD, MDD, and SAD. Sensitivity to and avoidance of NEC appears to be a transdiagnostic feature of these disorders.
广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)患者对负性情绪的急剧增加或正性情绪的减少(即负性情绪对比;NEC)较为敏感,并利用担忧来避免 NEC。对 NEC 的敏感性和回避也可能是重度抑郁症(MDD)和社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的共同特征。
在一个大型大学生样本中(N=1409),我们使用受试者工作特征分析来检验一种测量情绪对比回避的方法在检测可能的 GAD、MDD 和 SAD 中的准确性。
与无障碍者相比,可能患有 GAD、MDD 和 SAD 的参与者报告的对比回避水平更高(Cohen's d 值分别为 1.32、1.62 和 1.53)。预测可能的 GAD、MDD 和 SAD 的曲线下面积分别为 0.81、0.87 和 0.83。对于可能的 GAD 和 SAD,最佳预测准确性的截断值为 48.5,对于可能的 MDD,最佳准确性的截断值为 50.5。
一种测量情绪对比回避的方法在预测可能的 GAD、MDD 和 SAD 方面具有出色的能力。对 NEC 的敏感性和回避似乎是这些障碍的一个跨诊断特征。