• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Contrast avoidance as a diagnostic feature of OCD: A receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis of the contrast avoidance questionnaires.作为 OCD 的诊断特征的对比回避:对比回避问卷的受试者工作特征曲线分析。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 1;368:734-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.117. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
2
Harm avoidance and incompleteness core motivations in obsessive-compulsive disorder: validation of the Farsi version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (F-OC-TCDQ) in Iran.回避和不完整性核心动机在强迫症中的作用:伊朗版强迫特质核心维度问卷(F-OC-TCDQ)的验证。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 15;12(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02058-0.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Iranian Version of Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires: Could Contrast Avoidance Be a New Transdiagnostic Construct?伊朗版对比回避问卷的心理测量特性:对比回避能否成为一种新的跨诊断结构?
J Pers Assess. 2023 Nov-Dec;105(6):820-837. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2169153. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
4
An examination of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and dimensions using profile analysis via multidimensional scaling (PAMS).采用多维标度(PAMS)的剖析图对强迫症状和维度进行检查。
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 May;28(4):352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
5
Comparison of the Association Between Goal-Directed Planning and Self-reported Compulsivity vs Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Diagnosis.目标导向性计划与自我报告的强迫性与强迫症诊断之间的关联比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):77-85. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2998.
6
A transdiagnostic evaluation of contrast avoidance across generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and social anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍、重度抑郁症和社交焦虑障碍中对比回避的跨诊断评估。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Jan;93:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102662. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Experiential avoidance in symptom dimensions of OCD.强迫症症状维度中的经验性回避。
Bull Menninger Clin. 2014 Summer;78(3):253-69. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2014.78.3.253.
8
Interpersonal hostility and suspicious thinking in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症中的人际敌意和多疑思维。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Sep 30;243:295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.038. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
9
Obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders in obsessive-compulsive disorder and other anxiety disorders.强迫症及其他焦虑障碍中的强迫谱系障碍。
Psychopathology. 2010;43(6):389-96. doi: 10.1159/000321070. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
10
Patterns of alpha asymmetry in those with elevated worry, trait anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A test of the worry and avoidance models of alpha asymmetry.高担忧、特质焦虑和强迫症状人群的α波不对称模式:α波不对称的担忧和回避模型检验
Neuropsychologia. 2016 May;85:118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Why do individuals with generalized anxiety disorder and depression engage in worry and rumination? A momentary assessment study of positive contrast enhancement.为什么患有广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症的个体容易陷入担忧和沉思?一项关于正性对比增强的即时评估研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2025 Apr;111:102982. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.102982. Epub 2025 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Savoring changes novel positive mindset targets of GAD treatment: Optimism, prioritizing positivity, kill-joy thinking, and worry mediation.品尝变化——新型积极心态成为广泛性焦虑障碍治疗靶点:乐观、优先积极、扫兴思维和担忧调节。
Behav Res Ther. 2024 Jun;177:104541. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104541. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
An initial test of the contrast avoidance model in bipolar spectrum disorders.双相谱系障碍中对比回避模型的初步测试。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 May;173:286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.024. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Introduction to a special issue on the contrast avoidance model.关于对比避免模型的特刊介绍。
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Mar;102:102831. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102831. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom Dimensions and Their Relationships with Obsessive Beliefs: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.强迫症状维度及其与强迫信念的关系:结构方程模型分析。
Psychiatr Q. 2023 Sep;94(3):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s11126-023-10037-8. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
5
The transdiagnostic use of worry and rumination to avoid negative emotional contrasts following negative events: A momentary assessment study.采用担忧和反刍来避免负性事件后负性情绪对比:一项即时评估研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Apr;95:102679. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102679. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
6
Worry and rumination enhance a positive emotional contrast based on the framework of the Contrast Avoidance Model.担忧和沉思根据对比回避模型增强了基于正性情绪的对比。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Mar;94:102671. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102671. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
A transdiagnostic evaluation of contrast avoidance across generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and social anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍、重度抑郁症和社交焦虑障碍中对比回避的跨诊断评估。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Jan;93:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102662. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
8
Reducing contrast avoidance in GAD by savoring positive emotions: Outcome and mediation in a randomized controlled trial.通过品味积极情绪减少广泛性焦虑症中的对比回避:一项随机对照试验的结果和中介分析。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Jan;93:102659. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102659. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
9
The naturalistic reinforcement of worry from positive and negative emotional contrasts: Results from a momentary assessment study within social interactions.积极和消极情绪对比引发的自然强化担忧:社交互动中的瞬间评估研究结果。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Dec;92:102634. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102634. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
10
Correlates of Dampening and Savoring in Generalized Anxiety Disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍中情绪抑制与品味的相关因素
Int J Cogn Ther. 2022;15(4):414-433. doi: 10.1007/s41811-022-00145-x. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

作为 OCD 的诊断特征的对比回避:对比回避问卷的受试者工作特征曲线分析。

Contrast avoidance as a diagnostic feature of OCD: A receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis of the contrast avoidance questionnaires.

机构信息

The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.

The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 1;368:734-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.117. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.117
PMID:39299593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11560663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Models focusing on transdiagnostic mechanisms, such as repetitive negative thinking, may be of additive value to existing conceptualizations of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). One such model is the Contrast Avoidance Model (CAM), which posits that individuals with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are sensitive to sharp increases in emotions, and use worry to maintain heightened states of negative arousal to avoid these emotional shifts. The current study used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to examine the predictive utility of two contrast avoidance questionnaires in detecting probable OCD.

METHODS

Undergraduate students (N = 2880) completed measures of contrast avoidance (CAQ-GE and CAQ-W) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. A subset of participants were selected for the probable OCD group (n = 431) and the non-OCD group (n = 433).

RESULTS

Results showed significant differences in total CAQ-GE and CAQ-W scores between the probable OCD group and the non-OCD group. Area under the curve values demonstrated excellent accuracy in predicting probable OCD on the CAQ-GE and CAQ-W, (.87 and .88, respectively). Correlation analyses for the entire screening sample revealed that certain OC symptom dimensions (e.g., Unacceptable Thoughts; Responsibility for Harm) were more closely associated with the CAQ-GE and the CAQ-W relative to other symptom dimensions.

LIMITATIONS

The study had a cross-sectional design and relied on an undergraduate sample.

CONCLUSION

Identifying shared mechanisms across OCD and its comorbidities is an important and novel approach to understanding the etiology and maintenance of symptoms.

摘要

背景

关注跨诊断机制的模型,如重复性消极思维,可能对强迫症(OCD)的现有概念具有附加价值。其中一个模型是对比回避模型(CAM),它假设广泛性焦虑症(GAD)患者对情绪的急剧增加敏感,并使用担忧来维持负面唤醒的高度状态,以避免这些情绪变化。本研究使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析来检验两种对比回避问卷在检测可能的 OCD 中的预测效用。

方法

本科生(N=2880)完成了对比回避(CAQ-GE 和 CAQ-W)和强迫症症状的测量。选择一部分参与者进入可能的 OCD 组(n=431)和非 OCD 组(n=433)。

结果

结果显示,可能的 OCD 组和非 OCD 组之间的总 CAQ-GE 和 CAQ-W 分数存在显著差异。曲线下面积值表明 CAQ-GE 和 CAQ-W 对可能的 OCD 具有出色的预测准确性,分别为(.87 和.88)。对整个筛选样本的相关分析表明,某些 OC 症状维度(例如,不可接受的想法;对伤害的责任)与 CAQ-GE 和 CAQ-W 更为密切相关,而与其他症状维度相关性较低。

局限性

该研究采用横断面设计,依赖于本科生样本。

结论

识别 OCD 及其共病之间的共同机制是理解症状的病因和维持的一种重要和新颖的方法。