The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 1;368:734-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.117. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
Models focusing on transdiagnostic mechanisms, such as repetitive negative thinking, may be of additive value to existing conceptualizations of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). One such model is the Contrast Avoidance Model (CAM), which posits that individuals with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are sensitive to sharp increases in emotions, and use worry to maintain heightened states of negative arousal to avoid these emotional shifts. The current study used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to examine the predictive utility of two contrast avoidance questionnaires in detecting probable OCD.
Undergraduate students (N = 2880) completed measures of contrast avoidance (CAQ-GE and CAQ-W) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. A subset of participants were selected for the probable OCD group (n = 431) and the non-OCD group (n = 433).
Results showed significant differences in total CAQ-GE and CAQ-W scores between the probable OCD group and the non-OCD group. Area under the curve values demonstrated excellent accuracy in predicting probable OCD on the CAQ-GE and CAQ-W, (.87 and .88, respectively). Correlation analyses for the entire screening sample revealed that certain OC symptom dimensions (e.g., Unacceptable Thoughts; Responsibility for Harm) were more closely associated with the CAQ-GE and the CAQ-W relative to other symptom dimensions.
The study had a cross-sectional design and relied on an undergraduate sample.
Identifying shared mechanisms across OCD and its comorbidities is an important and novel approach to understanding the etiology and maintenance of symptoms.
关注跨诊断机制的模型,如重复性消极思维,可能对强迫症(OCD)的现有概念具有附加价值。其中一个模型是对比回避模型(CAM),它假设广泛性焦虑症(GAD)患者对情绪的急剧增加敏感,并使用担忧来维持负面唤醒的高度状态,以避免这些情绪变化。本研究使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析来检验两种对比回避问卷在检测可能的 OCD 中的预测效用。
本科生(N=2880)完成了对比回避(CAQ-GE 和 CAQ-W)和强迫症症状的测量。选择一部分参与者进入可能的 OCD 组(n=431)和非 OCD 组(n=433)。
结果显示,可能的 OCD 组和非 OCD 组之间的总 CAQ-GE 和 CAQ-W 分数存在显著差异。曲线下面积值表明 CAQ-GE 和 CAQ-W 对可能的 OCD 具有出色的预测准确性,分别为(.87 和.88)。对整个筛选样本的相关分析表明,某些 OC 症状维度(例如,不可接受的想法;对伤害的责任)与 CAQ-GE 和 CAQ-W 更为密切相关,而与其他症状维度相关性较低。
该研究采用横断面设计,依赖于本科生样本。
识别 OCD 及其共病之间的共同机制是理解症状的病因和维持的一种重要和新颖的方法。