Gupta Divya, Fischer Harry, Shrestha Suchita, Shoaib Ali Syed, Chhatre Ashwini, Devkota Kamal, Fleischman Forrest, Khatri Dil B, Rana Pushpendra
Indian School of Business, Hyderabad, India.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development, Uppsala, Sweden.
World Dev. 2021 May;141:105370. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105370. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
The global COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented disruption to lives and livelihoods around the world. These disruptions have brought into sharp focus experiences of vulnerability but also, at times, evidence of resilience as people and institutions gear up to respond to the crisis. Drawing on intensive qualitative enquiry in 16 villages of Himalayan India and Nepal, this paper documents both dark and bright spots from the early days of the pandemic. We find intense experiences of fear and uncertainty, heightened food insecurity, and drastic reductions in livelihood opportunities. However, we also find a wide range of individual and collective responses as well as a patchwork of policy support mechanisms that have provided at least some measure of basic security. Local elected governments have played a critical role in coordinating responses and delivering social support, however the nature of their actions varies as a result of different institutional arrangements and state support systems in the two countries. Our findings highlight the changing nature of vulnerability in the present era, as demographic shifts, growing off-farm employment and dependence on remittances, and increasing market integration have all brought about new kinds of exposure to risk for rural populations in the context of the present disruption and beyond. Most importantly, our research shows the critical importance of strong systems of state support for protecting basic well-being in times of crises. Based on these findings, we argue that there is a need for greater knowledge of how local institutions work in tandem with a broader set of state support mechanisms to generate responses for urgent challenges; such knowledge holds the potential to develop governance systems that are better able to confront diverse shocks that households face, both now and in the future.
全球新冠疫情给世界各地的生活和生计带来了前所未有的破坏。这些破坏使人们对脆弱性的体验更加凸显,但同时,当个人和机构准备应对危机时,也展现出了恢复力的迹象。本文基于对印度喜马拉雅地区和尼泊尔16个村庄的深入定性调查,记录了疫情初期的黯淡和亮点。我们发现人们有着强烈的恐惧和不确定感,粮食不安全状况加剧,生计机会大幅减少。然而,我们也发现了广泛的个人和集体应对措施,以及一系列拼凑而成的政策支持机制,这些机制至少提供了一定程度的基本保障。地方民选政府在协调应对措施和提供社会支持方面发挥了关键作用,然而,由于两国不同的制度安排和国家支持体系,其行动的性质有所不同。我们的研究结果凸显了当今时代脆弱性的变化本质,因为人口结构变化、非农就业和对汇款的依赖增加,以及市场一体化程度提高,都在当前的破坏背景及以后,给农村人口带来了新的风险。最重要的是,我们的研究表明,强大的国家支持体系对于在危机时期保护基本福祉至关重要。基于这些发现,我们认为有必要更深入了解地方机构如何与更广泛的国家支持机制协同工作,以应对紧迫挑战;这种知识有可能发展出更能应对家庭目前及未来所面临各种冲击的治理体系。