Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No.150 Jimo Road, Shanghai, 200120, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec 28;22(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02753-9.
To ascertain the agreement of corneal aberrations obtained from the Pentacam and the KR-1W in myopic populations and to investigate the influence of the level of myopia as well as the laterality on the agreement.
In this observational study, a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam AXL) and a Hartmann-Shack wavefront analyzer with Placido-disc topographer (KR-1W) were used to measure the aberrations of myopes in the anterior corneal surface by one experienced operator. All examinations were computed across a 6 mm diameter. Six subgroups were generated according to the degree of myopia (mild, moderate, and severe myopia) and the laterality of eyes (right and left eyes).
The study included 245 eyes of 170 participants. For certain anterior corneal aberrations, statistically significant differences existed between the Pentacam and the KR-1W (all P < .05). The values of Zernike (Z)(2,0), Z(2,2), Z(3,1), and Z(4,0) varied in all levels of myopia regardless of the laterality, with the values of the Pentacam constantly larger than the KR-1W in the measurement of Z(2,0), Z(2,2), and Z(4,0). For 2nd to 6th aberrations, both instruments correlated poorly to moderately. The width of limits of agreement between the two instruments was clinically too wide (> 0.1 μm) for aberrations closely correlated with visual quality, including Z(3, ± 3), Z(3, ± 1), and Z(4,0), and almost all aberrations, indicating poor agreement.
In clinical practice, the Pentacam based on Scheimpflug technology and the KR-1W based on Placido Disc System are not interchangeable in measuring anterior corneal aberration for myopes regardless of myopia degree and the laterality, suggesting that a consistent instrument should be selected for surgical design as well as follow-up.
确定 Pentacam 和 KR-1W 在近视人群中获得的角膜像差的一致性,并研究近视程度以及眼侧位对一致性的影响。
在这项观察性研究中,由一位经验丰富的操作者使用旋转 Scheimpflug 相机(Pentacam AXL)和带有 Placido 盘 topography 的 Hartmann-Shack 波前分析仪(KR-1W)测量前角膜表面的像差。所有检查均在 6mm 直径范围内进行。根据近视程度(轻度、中度和高度近视)和眼侧位(右眼和左眼)将研究对象分为 6 个亚组。
该研究纳入了 170 名参与者的 245 只眼。对于某些前角膜像差,Pentacam 和 KR-1W 之间存在统计学差异(均 P<0.05)。无论侧位如何,在所有近视程度下,Zernike(Z)(2,0)、Z(2,2)、Z(3,1)和 Z(4,0)的值均发生变化,Pentacam 在测量 Z(2,0)、Z(2,2)和 Z(4,0)时的值始终大于 KR-1W。对于 2 至 6 阶像差,两种仪器的相关性均较差或中度相关。两种仪器之间的一致性界限的宽度(>0.1μm)对于与视觉质量密切相关的像差太宽,包括 Z(3,±3)、Z(3,±1)和 Z(4,0),以及几乎所有像差,表明一致性差。
在临床实践中,基于 Scheimpflug 技术的 Pentacam 和基于 Placido Disc 系统的 KR-1W 在测量近视患者的前角膜像差时不能互换,无论近视程度和眼侧位如何,这表明在手术设计和随访中应选择一致的仪器。