• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Lenstar LS 900 与 Pentacam-AXL:屈光结果与预测屈光分析。

Lenstar LS 900 versus Pentacam-AXL: analysis of refractive outcomes and predicted refraction.

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Leiria, Rua das Olhalvas, 2410-197, Leiria, Portugal.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81146-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-81146-2
PMID:33446894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7809453/
Abstract

Analysis of refractive outcomes, using biometry data collected with a new biometer (Pentacam-AXL, OCULUS, Germany) and a reference biometer (Lenstar LS 900, HAAG-STREIT AG, Switzerland), in order to assess differences in the predicted and actual refraction using different formulas. Prospective, institutional study, in which intraocular lens (IOL) calculation was performed using the Haigis, SRK/T and Hoffer Q formulas with the two systems in patients undergoing cataract surgery between November 2016 and August 2017. Four to 6 weeks after surgery, the spherical equivalent (SE) was derived from objective refraction. Mean prediction error (PE), mean absolute error (MAE) and the median absolute error (MedAE) were calculated. The percentage of eyes within ± 0.25, ± 0.50, ± 1.00, and ± 2.00 D of MAE was determined. 104 eyes from 76 patients, 35 males (46.1%), underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. Mean SE after surgery was - 0.29 ± 0.46 D. Mean prediction error (PE) using the SRK/T, Haigis and Hoffer Q formulas with the Lenstar was significantly different (p > 0.0001) from PE calculated with the Pentacam in all three formulas. Percentage of eyes within ± 0.25 D MAE were larger with the Lenstar device, using all three formulas. The difference between the actual refractive error and the predicted refractive error is consistently lower when using Lenstar. The Pentacam-AXL user should be alert to the critical necessity of constant optimization in order to obtain optimal refractive results.

摘要

使用新的生物测量仪(德国 Oculus 的 Pentacam-AXL)和参考生物测量仪(瑞士 Haag-Streit AG 的 Lenstar LS 900)收集的生物测量数据进行屈光结果分析,以评估使用不同公式预测和实际屈光的差异。这是一项前瞻性的机构研究,在 2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 8 月期间,对接受白内障手术的患者,使用 Haigis、SRK/T 和 Hoffer Q 公式,通过这两个系统对人工晶状体(IOL)进行计算。术后 4 至 6 周,从客观折射中得出球镜等效值(SE)。计算平均预测误差(PE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和中值绝对误差(MedAE)。确定 MAE 误差在±0.25、±0.50、±1.00 和±2.00 D 的眼数百分比。纳入 76 例 104 只眼,其中 35 例为男性(46.1%),行超声乳化白内障吸除术联合人工晶状体植入术。术后平均 SE 为-0.29±0.46 D。使用 Lenstar 的 SRK/T、Haigis 和 Hoffer Q 公式计算的平均预测误差(PE)与使用 Pentacam 计算的所有三个公式的 PE 显著不同(p>0.0001)。使用所有三个公式,Lenstar 设备得出的 MAE 误差在±0.25 D 范围内的眼数比例更大。使用 Lenstar 时,实际屈光误差与预测屈光误差的差值始终较低。Pentacam-AXL 用户应注意不断优化的重要性,以获得最佳的屈光结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7abe/7809453/5e1a4b532e79/41598_2021_81146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7abe/7809453/5e1a4b532e79/41598_2021_81146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7abe/7809453/5e1a4b532e79/41598_2021_81146_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Lenstar LS 900 versus Pentacam-AXL: analysis of refractive outcomes and predicted refraction.Lenstar LS 900 与 Pentacam-AXL:屈光结果与预测屈光分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81146-2.
2
Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation.Lenstar® LS 900与Pentacam®-AXL对比研究:眼部生物测量及人工晶状体度数计算
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;28(6):645-651. doi: 10.1177/1120672118771844. Epub 2018 May 22.
3
Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in cataract patients with steep corneal curvature.在角膜曲率陡峭的白内障患者中,人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0241630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241630. eCollection 2020.
4
Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas.陡峭角膜中各种人工晶状体屈光力计算公式的准确性。
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):385-389. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_20_17.
5
[Intraocular lens power calculation for high myopic eyes with cataract: comparison of three formulas].[白内障高度近视眼人工晶状体屈光度计算:三种公式的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 11;53(4):260-265. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.04.007.
6
Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.使用两种生物测量设备和多种人工晶状体屈光度计算公式预测多焦点人工晶状体屈光的准确性。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 May-Jun;43(4):328-34. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12478. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
[The analysis of refractive error of long axial high myopic eyes after IOL implantation].[人工晶状体植入术后长轴高度近视眼屈光不正的分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;51(4):276-81.
8
The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.眼部生物测量因素对各种人工晶状体屈光力计算公式准确性的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 May 2;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0454-y.
9
Comparison of IOL power calculation and refractive outcome after laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术后人工晶状体度数计算和屈光结果的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Aug;28(8):540-4. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120703-04. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
10
Refractive predictability using two optical biometers and refraction types for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.白内障手术中两种光学生物测量仪和折射类型的眼内晶状体屈光力计算的预测性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;40(7):1849-1856. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01355-y. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Biometry and keratometry measurements after intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus patients: a pilot comparison between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700.圆锥角膜患者植入角膜内环片段后的生物测量和角膜曲率测量:Pentacam AXL与IOL Master 700的初步比较
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03914-2.
2
Agreements' profile of Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with gold standard partial coherence interferometry.基于Scheimpflug原理的光学生物测量仪与金标准部分相干干涉测量法的一致性概况。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 18;16(12):2095-2104. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.12.24. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery.既往接受过角膜屈光手术的眼睛的人工晶状体度数计算
Eye Vis (Lond). 2018 Jul 8;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s40662-018-0110-5. eCollection 2018.
2
Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation.Lenstar® LS 900与Pentacam®-AXL对比研究:眼部生物测量及人工晶状体度数计算
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;28(6):645-651. doi: 10.1177/1120672118771844. Epub 2018 May 22.
3
Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
The impact of posterior corneal astigmatism on the surgical planning of toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation.
角膜后表面散光对散光多焦点人工晶状体植入手术规划的影响。
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2022 Oct 15;3(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.08.001. eCollection 2023 Feb-Mar.
4
Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation between Standard Partial Coherence Interferometry-Based and Scheimpflug-Based Biometers: The Importance of Lens Constant Optimization.基于标准部分相干干涉测量法和基于Scheimpflug原理的生物测量仪之间人工晶状体屈光力计算的比较:晶状体常数优化的重要性。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 11;35(1):42-49. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_32_23. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
5
Comparison of anterior corneal aberrations measured by Scheimpflug and Placido Disc System for myopes.比较Scheimpflug 和 Placido 盘系统测量的近视患者的角膜前像差。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec 28;22(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02753-9.
6
The effect of implantable collamer Lens V4c on ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation based on Pentacam-AXL and IOLMaster 500.基于 Pentacam-AXL 和 IOLMaster 500 的植入 Collamer 透镜 V4c 对眼生物测量和人工晶状体度数计算的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02644-z.
7
The binocular intraocular lens power difference in eyes with different axial lengths.不同眼轴长度眼睛的双眼人工晶状体屈光度差异。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 18;15(6):924-931. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.06.09. eCollection 2022.
8
Ocular Biometric Values and Prevalence of Corneal Astigmatism in Patients Candidate for Cataract Surgery.白内障手术候选患者的眼部生物特征值及角膜散光患病率
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 16;34(1):56-59. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_33_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
对具有生物测量功能的Scheimpflug设备和参考光学生物测量仪所进行的眼前节参数及眼轴长度测量结果的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 May;39(5):1115-1122. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0927-x. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Comparison of Repeatability and Agreement between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Dual-Scheimpflug Topography.扫频光学生物测量与双Scheimpflug地形图之间的重复性和一致性比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1516395. doi: 10.1155/2017/1516395. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
5
Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.基于Scheimpflug技术和扫频光学生物测量的重复性及一致性
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Oct;40(5):318-322. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
6
Comparison of Axial Length, Corneal Curvature, and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements of 2 Recently Introduced Devices to a Known Biometer.将最近推出的2种设备的眼轴长度、角膜曲率和前房深度测量值与已知的生物测量仪进行比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;178:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.02.027. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Refractive outcomes comparison between the Lenstar LS 900® optical biometry and immersion A-scan ultrasound.Lenstar LS 900®光学生物测量仪与浸没式A超在屈光手术结果方面的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;35(4):459-66. doi: 10.1007/s10792-014-9970-4. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
8
Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.Scheimpflug 角膜屈光度测量在白内障手术中的人工晶状体屈光度计算。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;156(3):460-467.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
Comparing optical low coherence reflectometry and immersion ultrasound in refractive outcome after cataract surgery.白内障手术后屈光结果中光学低相干反射测量法与浸入式超声检查的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Feb;39(2):297-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.003.
10
Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization.比较浸液超声和光学生物测量在有和没有公式优化的情况下对人工晶状体屈光力的预测。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;250(9):1321-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2013-9. Epub 2012 Apr 13.