Henriquez Maria Alejandra, Zúñiga Raúl, Camino Maythé, Camargo Jorge, Ruiz-Montenegro Katia, Izquierdo Luis
From the Research Department, Oftalmosalud Institute of Eyes, San Isidro, Lima, Perú.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Sep;46(9):1222-1228. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000237.
To evaluate the effectiveness and agreement of 3 optical biometers in measuring axial length (AL) and biometric parameters in the eyes of patients with mature cataracts.
Oftalmosalud Instituto de Ojos, Peru.
Prospective, comparative study.
Eyes with mature cataracts were examined. Three consecutive scans were performed with each device: the IOLMaster 700, the Galilei G6, and the Pentacam AXL. The following parameters were recorded: AL, anterior flat keratometry (K1), steep K (K2), anterior astigmatism, mean K (Km), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and lens thickness. Agreement between devices was assessed using the coefficient of correlation of concordance (CCC).
Forty-five eyes were included. After 3 attempts, the acquisition success rates in measuring mature cataracts were 84.4% (38/45), 42.2% (19/45), and 37.7% (17/45) for the IOLMaster, the Galilei, and the Pentacam, respectively. Significant differences were found between the Pentacam and the IOLMaster in terms of AL, K2, and CCT. Significant differences were found in terms of K1, K2, Km, ACD, and CCT between the Pentacam and the Galilei; and significant differences were found in AL, K1, Km, and ACD between the Galilei and the IOLMaster (P < .05 all). Good correlations were found between devices (>0.90) in terms of keratometries and AL.
The IOLMaster 700 had the highest AL acquisition success rate when compared with the Pentacam AXL and Galilei G6. Good agreement between devices was found in terms of AL and K readings.
评估3种光学生物测量仪测量成熟期白内障患者眼轴长度(AL)及生物测量参数的有效性和一致性。
秘鲁Oftalmosalud眼科研究所。
前瞻性比较研究。
对成熟期白内障患者的眼睛进行检查。使用以下三种设备各进行连续3次扫描:IOLMaster 700、Galilei G6和Pentacam AXL。记录以下参数:AL、前表面角膜曲率(K1)、陡峭角膜曲率(K2)、前散光、平均角膜曲率(Km)、前房深度(ACD)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)和晶状体厚度。使用一致性相关系数(CCC)评估设备之间的一致性。
纳入45只眼。经过3次尝试后,IOLMaster、Galilei和Pentacam测量成熟期白内障的采集成功率分别为84.4%(38/45)、42.2%(19/45)和37.7%(17/45)。Pentacam和IOLMaster在AL、K2和CCT方面存在显著差异。Pentacam和Galilei在K1、K2、Km、ACD和CCT方面存在显著差异;Galilei和IOLMaster在AL、K1、Km和ACD方面存在显著差异(均P < .05)。在角膜曲率测量和AL方面,各设备之间存在良好的相关性(>0.90)。
与Pentacam AXL和Galilei G6相比,IOLMaster 700的AL采集成功率最高。各设备在AL和K读数方面具有良好的一致性。