• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激光治疗外伤性面部纹身。

Lasers treatment for traumatic facial tattoo.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University (Xijing Hospital), Xi'an, 710032, China.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 29;38(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03658-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-022-03658-1
PMID:36580127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9800346/
Abstract

Effective treatment for traumatic tattoo is lacking. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety between Q-1064 nm laser as monotherapy and alternating Q-1064 nm laser with CO AFL in treating traumatic facial tattoo (black or blue color) and accompanied scars. Clinical data of 98 patients were grouped and analyzed based on the different treatment lasers. Tattoo clearance was evaluated with a 4-point scale, and scar improvement was analyzed with modified VOSAS scores. Patient satisfaction of the tattoo clearance and scar improvement, and treatment-related complications were analyzed. Significant increased clinical effects with patient satisfaction and decreased worsened scar were confirmed with the two alternated lasers, relative to those with Q-1064 nm laser alone (P < 0.05). Consequently, alternating Q-1064 nm laser and CO AFL treatment could be used for traumatic facial tattoo with black or blue color removal safely and effectively.

摘要

目前针对外伤性纹身缺乏有效的治疗方法。本研究旨在比较 Q-1064nm 激光单药治疗与 Q-1064nm 激光与 CO AFL 交替治疗外伤性面部纹身(黑色或蓝色)及伴随瘢痕的疗效和安全性。根据不同的治疗激光,对 98 例患者的临床资料进行分组分析。采用 4 分制评估纹身清除情况,采用改良 VOSAS 评分分析瘢痕改善情况。分析患者对纹身清除和瘢痕改善的满意度以及与治疗相关的并发症。与 Q-1064nm 激光单独治疗相比,两种交替激光治疗的临床效果明显提高,患者满意度增加,瘢痕恶化程度降低(P<0.05)。因此,交替使用 Q-1064nm 激光和 CO AFL 治疗可安全有效地去除外伤性面部黑色或蓝色纹身。

相似文献

1
Lasers treatment for traumatic facial tattoo.激光治疗外伤性面部纹身。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 29;38(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03658-1.
2
Comparison of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone versus its combination with ultrapulse CO laser for the treatment of black tattoo.调Q Nd:YAG激光单独使用与联合超脉冲CO₂激光治疗黑色纹身的比较。
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017 Oct;19(5):259-265. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2017.1314506. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
Comparison of the Scar Prevention Effect Between a Carbon Dioxide Fractional Laser and a Continuous Ablative Carbon Dioxide Laser with a 595-nm Nd:YAG Laser.二氧化碳点阵激光与 595nm 掺钕钇铝石榴石连续激光治疗后瘢痕预防效果的比较。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):213-220. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1210-2. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
4
1550-nm Nonablative Fractional Laser Versus 10,600-nm Ablative Fractional Laser in the Treatment of Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Comparison Study on Efficacy and Treatment Regimen.1550nm 非剥脱性点阵激光与 10600nm 剥脱性点阵激光治疗手术和外伤性瘢痕的疗效和治疗方案比较研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Jun;46(6):780-788. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002152.
5
Fractional CO2 laser is as effective as Q-switched ruby laser for the initial treatment of a traumatic tattoo.二氧化碳分次激光在创伤性纹身的初始治疗中与调Q红宝石激光效果相当。
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014 Dec;16(6):303-5. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2014.956669. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
6
Combination of CO2 and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers is more effective than Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone for eyebrow tattoo removal.二氧化碳激光与调Q开关钕:钇铝石榴石激光联合使用在去除纹眉方面比单独使用调Q开关钕:钇铝石榴石激光更有效。
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2015 Apr;17(2):65-8. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2014.988724. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
New and Advanced Picosecond Lasers for Tattoo Removal.用于纹身去除的新型先进皮秒激光
Curr Probl Dermatol. 2017;52:113-123. doi: 10.1159/000450812. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
Improvement in linear depressed atrophic scar using 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser vs. ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser.755nm 皮秒翠绿宝石激光治疗线性凹陷萎缩性瘢痕的疗效优于剥脱性点阵二氧化碳激光。
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2022 Jul 4;24(1-5):48-55. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2022.2100915. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
9
Perfluorodecalin-infused patch in picosecond and Q-switched laser-assisted tattoo removal: Safety in Fitzpatrick IV-VI skin types.全氟萘烷注入贴片用于皮秒和调Q激光辅助纹身去除: Fitzpatrick IV-VI型皮肤的安全性
Lasers Surg Med. 2019 Jan;51(1):23-26. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23022. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
10
Lasers for tattoo removal: a review.激光去除纹身:综述。
Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Sep;25(5):619-27. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0800-2. Epub 2010 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Dermoscopic Evaluation of Combined Treatment with Fractional Co2 and Nanosecond Q-1064 nm Laser for Traumatic Facial Tattoo.剥脱性二氧化碳激光联合纳秒调Q-1064nm激光治疗外伤性面部纹身的皮肤镜评估
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024 Apr 1;14(2):e2024087. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1402a87.
2
Successful Removal of 17 Tattoos Self-Administered Using Black Eyeliner Ink with Quality-Switched Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet 1,064-nm Laser: A Case Report.使用质量开关掺钕钇铝石榴石1064纳米激光成功去除17处用黑色眼线墨水自行纹刺的纹身:一例报告
Case Rep Dermatol. 2024 Apr 22;16(1):108-115. doi: 10.1159/000538555. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Laser tattoo removal: laser principles and an updated guide for clinicians.激光去除纹身:激光原理及临床医生最新指南。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Aug;37(6):2581-2587. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03576-2. Epub 2022 May 23.
2
The efficacy and safety of fractional CO laser therapy in the treatment of burn scars: A meta-analysis.分次二氧化碳激光治疗烧伤瘢痕的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Burns. 2021 Nov;47(7):1469-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
3
Comparison of 1565-nm Nonablative Fractional Laser and 10600-nm Ablative Fractional Laser in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Atrophic Acne Scars.
1565nm 非剥脱性点阵激光与 10600nm 剥脱性点阵激光治疗轻中度凹陷性痤疮瘢痕的疗效比较。
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Mar 1;47(3):392-396. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002771.
4
Ablative laser surgery for allergic tattoo reactions: a retrospective study.消蚀性激光手术治疗过敏性纹身反应:一项回顾性研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Aug;36(6):1241-1248. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03164-2. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
Laser tattoo removal: Fundamental principles and practical approach.激光纹身去除:基本原理与实用方法。
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Jan;34(1):e14418. doi: 10.1111/dth.14418. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Comparing the efficacy and safety of laser treatments in tattoo removal: A systematic review.比较激光治疗纹身去除的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Jul;87(1):103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.117. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
Traumatic Facial Tattoo Injuries From Gunpowder and Ammunition: A Case Series.火药和弹药所致创伤性面部纹身损伤:病例系列
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2020 Jun;13(2):133-137. doi: 10.1177/1943387520902893. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
High-frequency (20 MHz) high-intensity focused ultrasound: New ablative method for color-independent tattoo removal in 1-3 sessions. An open-label exploratory study.高频(20MHz)高强度聚焦超声:一种新的消融方法,可在 1-3 次治疗中实现非颜色依赖性纹身去除。一项开放性探索性研究。
Skin Res Technol. 2020 Nov;26(6):839-850. doi: 10.1111/srt.12885. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
Increased Tattoo Fading in a Single Laser Tattoo Removal Session Enabled by a Rapid Acoustic Pulse Device: A Prospective Clinical Trial.快速声波脉冲装置增强单次激光洗纹身效果的前瞻性临床试验。
Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Jan;52(1):70-76. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23163. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
10
Combined pulsed dye laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser intraumatic facial tattoo removal: A case series.联合脉冲染料激光和 Q 开关 Nd:YAG 激光内创伤性面部纹身去除:病例系列。
Dermatol Ther. 2019 Sep;32(5):e13069. doi: 10.1111/dth.13069. Epub 2019 Sep 10.