• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏头痛量表功能评估的开发数据集。

The Functional Assessment of Migraine Scale development datasets.

作者信息

Buchanan Erin M, Cady Ryan J, Manley Heather R, Sly James S, Wikowsky Addie

机构信息

Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Analytics, 326 Market St, Harrisburg, PA 17101, United States.

Clinvest Research, LLC, 909 E Republic Rd Building D 200, Springfield, MO 65807, United States.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2022 Dec 5;46:108803. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108803. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2022.108803
PMID:36582983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9792720/
Abstract

The Functional Assessment of Migraine Scale (FAMS) is a newly developed questionnaire that allows patients to indicate their response to migraine treatment [1]. The datasets provided in this article were collected on patients with migraine using survey methodology in two rounds of data collection. In the first dataset ( = 100), patients were shown 210 proposed questions for the FAMS and rated their usefulness and/or relevance for assessing their treatment response [2]. Using factor analyses, the best items were selected for the second data collection ( = 200). Patients completed the final proposed 72 items along with two other popular measures of migraine assessment [3]. Both datasets include demographic and migraine related information (gender, race, medication, number of headache and migraine days). These data provide a wealth of information about the number and types of medications a patient with migraine may take, coupled with information about their perceived response to treatment with those medications. Because the FAMS was developed to assess a wide range of concerns voiced by patients, this data offers new insights into a large health population beyond the normal scope of research studies.

摘要

偏头痛功能评估量表(FAMS)是一种新开发的问卷,可让患者表明其对偏头痛治疗的反应[1]。本文提供的数据集是在两轮数据收集过程中,采用调查方法收集的偏头痛患者的数据。在第一个数据集(n = 100)中,向患者展示了FAMS的210个拟议问题,并让他们对这些问题在评估其治疗反应方面的有用性和/或相关性进行评分[2]。通过因子分析,为第二轮数据收集(n = 200)选择了最佳项目。患者完成了最终的72个拟议项目以及另外两种常用的偏头痛评估方法[3]。两个数据集均包含人口统计学和偏头痛相关信息(性别、种族、药物治疗、头痛天数和偏头痛天数)。这些数据提供了大量有关偏头痛患者可能服用的药物数量和类型的信息,以及他们对这些药物治疗效果的感知信息。由于FAMS的开发目的是评估患者表达的广泛问题,因此这些数据为超出正常研究范围的大量健康人群提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
The Functional Assessment of Migraine Scale development datasets.偏头痛量表功能评估的开发数据集。
Data Brief. 2022 Dec 5;46:108803. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108803. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Development of the functional assessment of migraine scale using a patient guided approach.采用患者指导方法开发偏头痛功能评估量表。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):867-879. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03279-9. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
Identifying patients who require a change in their current acute migraine treatment: the Migraine Assessment of Current Therapy (Migraine-ACT) questionnaire.识别需要改变当前急性偏头痛治疗方案的患者:当前治疗偏头痛评估(Migraine-ACT)问卷。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jul;20(7):1125-35. doi: 10.1185/030079904125004079.
4
Improving Medical Communication in Migraine Management: A Modified Delphi Study to Develop a Digital Migraine Tracker.改善偏头痛管理中的医学沟通:开发数字偏头痛追踪器的改良德尔菲研究。
Headache. 2018 Oct;58(9):1358-1372. doi: 10.1111/head.13426.
5
Outcome measures for assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in frequent episodic or chronic migraine: a Delphi study.评估非药物干预在频繁发作性或慢性偏头痛中有效性的结局指标:一项德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e029855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029855.
6
The American Registry for Migraine Research: Research Methods and Baseline Data for an Initial Patient Cohort.美国偏头痛研究注册处:初始患者队列的研究方法和基线数据。
Headache. 2020 Feb;60(2):337-347. doi: 10.1111/head.13688. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
7
Migraine co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain: Validation of questionnaires.偏头痛合并紧张型头痛和颈部疼痛:问卷验证
Scand J Pain. 2015 Jul 1;8(1):10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.03.001.
8
Predicting Inadequate Response to Acute Migraine Medication: Results From the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study.预测急性偏头痛药物治疗反应不足:来自美国偏头痛患病率和预防(AMPP)研究的结果。
Headache. 2016 Nov;56(10):1635-1648. doi: 10.1111/head.12941. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
9
A cross-sectional survey to assess the migraineur's medication decision-making beliefs: determining when a migraine is triptan-worthy.一项评估偏头痛患者药物决策信念的横断面调查:确定何时偏头痛值得使用曲坦类药物。
Headache. 2013 Jul-Aug;53(7):1134-46. doi: 10.1111/head.12140. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Predictive models for determining treatment response to nonprescription acute medications in migraine: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study.用于预测非处方急性偏头痛药物治疗反应的预测模型:来自美国偏头痛患病率和预防研究的结果。
Headache. 2022 Jun;62(6):755-765. doi: 10.1111/head.14312. Epub 2022 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the functional assessment of migraine scale using a patient guided approach.采用患者指导方法开发偏头痛功能评估量表。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):867-879. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03279-9. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
2
What Is Migraine?什么是偏头痛?
JAMA. 2022 Jan 4;327(1):93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21857.
3
Health-related quality of life and ways of coping with stress in patients with migraine.偏头痛患者的健康相关生活质量及应对压力的方式。
Neurol Sci. 2017 Feb;38(2):295-301. doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2759-7. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
4
Prophylaxis of migraine: general principles and patient acceptance.偏头痛预防:一般原则和患者接受度。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008 Dec;4(6):1155-67. doi: 10.2147/ndt.s3497.
5
Validation of the revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire: measuring satisfaction with acute migraine treatment.修订版偏头痛患者感知问卷的验证:评估急性偏头痛治疗的满意度
Headache. 2006 Feb;46(2):240-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00289.x.
6
A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6.用于测量头痛影响的六项简式调查问卷:HIT-6。
Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):963-74. doi: 10.1023/a:1026119331193.
7
Assessment of migraine disability using the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: a comparison of chronic migraine with episodic migraine.使用偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷评估偏头痛残疾:慢性偏头痛与发作性偏头痛的比较。
Headache. 2003 Apr;43(4):336-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03068.x.
8
Validation of the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire.偏头痛患者感知问卷的验证
Value Health. 2002 Sep-Oct;5(5):422-30. doi: 10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.55120.x.
9
What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment?偏头痛患者对急性偏头痛治疗有哪些期望?
Headache. 2002 Jan;42 Suppl 1:3-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.0420s1003.x.