• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响 COVID-19 移动应用程序采用和评估的国家和应用程序层面的因素。

Country- and app-level factors affecting the adoption and evaluation of COVID-19 mobile apps.

机构信息

School of Communication and Design, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Public and International Affairs, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 31;22(1):2457. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14918-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-14918-8
PMID:36585671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9803399/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Countries across the globe have released many COVID-19 mobile apps. However, there is a lack of systematic empirical investigation into the factors affecting the adoption and evaluation of COVID-related apps. This study explores what factors at the country level and the app levels would influence the adoption and evaluation of COVID-19 apps.

METHODS

We collected data on 267 COVID-19 apps in App Store and Google Play. The number of installs, ratings, reviews and rating scores were used as indicators of adoption and evaluation. Country-level predictors include the number of infected cases and the political system (i.e., democratic vs. non-democratic). App-level predictors include developer (i.e., government vs. non-government) and functions. Four app functions were coded for analysis: providing health information, contact tracing, home monitoring, and consultation. Negative binomial regression and OLS (Ordinary Least Square) regression were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Our analyses show that apps developed by countries with more infected cases (B = 0.079, CI (Confidence Interval) = 0.000, 0.158; P = .049) and by non-governmental institutions (B=-0.369, CI=-0.653, -0.083; P = .01) received more positive rating scores. Apps with home monitoring function received lower rating scores (B=-0.550, CI=-0.971, -0.129; P = .01). Regarding adoption, apps developed by governments were more likely to be installed (IRR (Incident Rate Ratio) = 8.156, CI = 3.389, 19.626; P < .001), to be rated (IRR = 26.036, CI = 7.331, 92.468; P < .001), and to receive user comments (IRR = 12.080, CI = 3.954, 37.568; p < .001). Apps with functions of contact tracing or consultation were more likely to be installed (IRR = 4.533, CI = 2.072, 9.918; p < .001; IRR = 4.885, CI = 1.970, 12.111; p < .001), to be rated (IRR = 11.634, CI = 3.486, 38.827; p < .001; IRR = 17.194, CI = 5.309, 55.680; p < .001), and to receive user comments (IRR = 5.688, CI = 2.052, 5.770; p < .001; IRR = 16.718, CI = 5.363, 52.113; p < .001). Apps with home monitoring functions were less likely to be rated (IRR = 0.206, CI = 0.047, 0.896; P = .04) but more likely to receive user comments (IRR = 3.874, CI = 1.044, 14.349; P = .04). Further analysis shows that apps developed in democratic countries (OR (Odd Ratio) = 3.650, CI = 1.238, 10.758; P = .02) or by governments (OR = 7.987, CI = 4.106, 15.534, P < .001) were more likely to include the function of contact tracing.

CONCLUSION

This study systematically investigates factors affecting the adoption and evaluation of COVID-19 apps. Evidence shows that government-developed apps and the inclusion of contact tracing and consultation app functions strongly predict app adoption.

摘要

背景

全球各国发布了许多 COVID-19 移动应用程序。然而,对于影响 COVID 相关应用程序采用和评估的因素,缺乏系统的实证研究。本研究探讨了国家层面和应用程序层面的哪些因素会影响 COVID-19 应用程序的采用和评估。

方法

我们收集了 App Store 和 Google Play 上 267 个 COVID-19 应用程序的数据。安装次数、评分、评论和评分分数被用作采用和评估的指标。国家层面的预测因素包括感染病例数和政治制度(即民主与非民主)。应用程序层面的预测因素包括开发者(即政府与非政府)和功能。分析中对四个应用程序功能进行了编码:提供健康信息、接触者追踪、家庭监测和咨询。使用负二项回归和普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归分析数据。

结果

我们的分析表明,来自感染病例较多的国家(B=0.079,置信区间(CI)=0.000,0.158;P=0.049)和非政府机构(B=-0.369,CI=-0.653,-0.083;P=0.01)开发的应用程序获得了更多的正面评分分数。具有家庭监测功能的应用程序获得的评分分数较低(B=-0.550,CI=-0.971,-0.129;P=0.01)。关于采用情况,政府开发的应用程序更有可能被安装(发生率比(IRR)=8.156,CI=3.389,19.626;P<0.001)、被评分(IRR=26.036,CI=7.331,92.468;P<0.001)和收到用户评论(IRR=12.080,CI=3.954,37.568;P<0.001)。具有接触者追踪或咨询功能的应用程序更有可能被安装(IRR=4.533,CI=2.072,9.918;P<0.001;IRR=4.885,CI=1.970,12.111;P<0.001)、被评分(IRR=11.634,CI=3.486,38.827;P<0.001;IRR=17.194,CI=5.309,55.680;P<0.001)和收到用户评论(IRR=5.688,CI=2.052,5.770;P<0.001;IRR=16.718,CI=5.363,52.113;P<0.001)。具有家庭监测功能的应用程序更不可能被评分(IRR=0.206,CI=0.047,0.896;P=0.04),但更有可能收到用户评论(IRR=3.874,CI=1.044,14.349;P=0.04)。进一步分析表明,在民主国家(OR=3.650,CI=1.238,10.758;P=0.02)或由政府(OR=7.987,CI=4.106,15.534,P<0.001)开发的应用程序更有可能包含接触者追踪功能。

结论

本研究系统地调查了影响 COVID-19 应用程序采用和评估的因素。证据表明,政府开发的应用程序和包含接触者追踪和咨询应用程序功能强烈预测了应用程序的采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0f/9805244/9bea02d1a89e/12889_2022_14918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0f/9805244/4763018c35bf/12889_2022_14918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0f/9805244/9bea02d1a89e/12889_2022_14918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0f/9805244/4763018c35bf/12889_2022_14918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f0f/9805244/9bea02d1a89e/12889_2022_14918_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Country- and app-level factors affecting the adoption and evaluation of COVID-19 mobile apps.影响 COVID-19 移动应用程序采用和评估的国家和应用程序层面的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 31;22(1):2457. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14918-8.
2
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.**COVID-19 追踪应用的质量和采用情况,以及开发建议:对欧洲应用的系统跨学科审查。**
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989.
3
Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study.美国数字接触者追踪移动健康工具的上市后评估模型的调整和利用:观察性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 22;9:e38633. doi: 10.2196/38633.
4
Data Management and Privacy Policy of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps: Systematic Review and Content Analysis.COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的数据管理和隐私政策:系统评价和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jul 12;10(7):e35195. doi: 10.2196/35195.
5
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
6
COVID-19 contact tracing app reviews reveal concerns and motivations around adoption.新冠接触者追踪应用程序评估揭示了人们对采用该应用程序的担忧和动机。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273222. eCollection 2022.
7
State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review.接触者追踪应用程序的应用现状以及关于隐私保护和公共卫生的建议:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):e23250. doi: 10.2196/23250.
8
Mobile Health Apps on COVID-19 Launched in the Early Days of the Pandemic: Content Analysis and Review.大流行早期推出的 COVID-19 移动健康应用程序:内容分析和综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e19796. doi: 10.2196/19796.
9
Features and Functionalities of Smartphone Apps Related to COVID-19: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.与新冠病毒相关的智能手机应用程序的特点和功能:应用商店中的系统搜索与内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e20334. doi: 10.2196/20334.
10
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms between android and iOS CoronaCheck app users.安卓和iOS系统的CoronaCheck应用程序用户自我报告的新冠病毒症状比较。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 9;8(1):197. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01595-1.
2
Advanced Mobile Communication Techniques in the Fight against the COVID-19 Pandemic Era and Beyond: An Overview of 5G/B5G/6G.抗击新冠疫情及未来的先进移动通信技术:5G/B5G/6G概述
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;23(18):7817. doi: 10.3390/s23187817.
3
Social frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
A First Look at Privacy Analysis of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Mobile Applications.新冠疫情接触者追踪移动应用的隐私分析初探。
IEEE Internet Things J. 2020 Sep 17;8(21):15796-15806. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3024180. eCollection 2021 Nov 1.
2
Dissecting contact tracing apps in the Android platform.剖析 Android 平台中的接触者追踪应用。
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251867. eCollection 2021.
3
Americans' perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic.美国人对 COVID-19 大流行期间隐私和监控的看法。
社会脆弱性作为老年人不良结局的预测指标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jul;35(7):1417-1428. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02421-y. Epub 2023 May 23.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0242652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242652. eCollection 2020.
4
COVID-19-Extending Surveillance and the Panopticon.COVID-19-扩展监测与全景敞视。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):809-814. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10036-5. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
Observational study of UK mobile health apps for COVID-19.英国用于新冠肺炎的移动健康应用程序的观察性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Aug;2(8):e388-e390. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30144-8. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
The need for privacy with public digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,公共数字接触者追踪中对隐私的需求。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jul;2(7):e342-e344. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30133-3. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
7
A Systematic Review of Smartphone Applications Available for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID19) and the Assessment of their Quality Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).用于 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID19) 的智能手机应用程序的系统评价及使用移动应用程序评级量表 (MARS) 对其质量的评估。
J Med Syst. 2020 Aug 10;44(9):164. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01633-3.
8
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
9
Adoption of a Contact Tracing App for Containing COVID-19: A Health Belief Model Approach.采用接触者追踪应用程序控制 COVID-19:健康信念模型方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 1;6(3):e20572. doi: 10.2196/20572.
10
Features and Functionalities of Smartphone Apps Related to COVID-19: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.与新冠病毒相关的智能手机应用程序的特点和功能:应用商店中的系统搜索与内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e20334. doi: 10.2196/20334.