• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛津关于原发性凸轮形态与股骨髋臼撞击综合征的共识:第1部分——定义、术语、分类及影像学结果

Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 1-definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcomes.

作者信息

Dijkstra H Paul, Mc Auliffe Sean, Ardern Clare L, Kemp Joanne L, Mosler Andrea Britt, Price Amy, Blazey Paul, Richards Dawn, Farooq Abdulaziz, Serner Andreas, McNally Eugene, Mascarenhas Vasco, Willy Richard W, Oke Jason L, Khan Karim M, Glyn-Jones Sion, Clarke Mike, Greenhalgh Trisha

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar

Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2022 Dec 6;57(6):325-41. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106085.

DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2022-106085
PMID:
36588401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9985727/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Primary cam morphology is a mostly benign bony prominence that develops at the femoral head-neck junction of the hip, but it is highly prevalent in many athlete populations. In the small proportion of athletes for whom it is not benign, the resulting hip osteoarthritis can be debilitating. Clinicians, athletes, patients and researchers do not yet agree on important primary cam morphology elements. We aimed to ascertain and improve the level of agreement on primary cam morphology definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcome measures.

METHODS

To collect and aggregate informed opinions, an expert panel-the Young Athlete's Hip Research Collaborative-rated primary cam morphology definition, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcome statements through an online Delphi exercise followed by an online meeting to explore areas of tension and dissent. Reporting followed Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies.

RESULTS

A diverse and inclusive Delphi panel (n=65 for rounds 1 and 2, representing 18 countries; 6 stakeholder groups; 40% women) agreed on 35 of 47 statements in 4 domains, while surfacing areas of tension and dissent. This Delphi panel agreed on four key issues essential to moving research and clinical care forward around primary cam morphology. They agreed on: (1) definition, confirming its conceptual attributes (tissue type, size, location, shape and ownership); (2) terminology-use 'morphology' and not terms with a negative connotation like 'lesion', 'abnormality' or 'deformity'; (3) taxonomy, distinguishing between primary and secondary cam morphology, and (4) imaging outcomes, a continuous bone/cartilage alpha angle on radial femoral head-neck MRI for primary cam morphology aetiology research.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provides athletes, patients, clinicians and researchers with a strong foundation to guide more precise communication, better clinical decision-making and higher value research about primary cam morphology and its natural history.

摘要

引言

原发性凸轮形态是一种大多为良性的骨性隆起,发生于髋关节的股骨头 - 颈交界处,但在许多运动员群体中高度普遍。在一小部分并非良性的运动员中,由此导致的髋骨关节炎可能使人衰弱。临床医生、运动员、患者和研究人员在原发性凸轮形态的重要要素上尚未达成共识。我们旨在确定并提高在原发性凸轮形态定义、术语、分类法和影像学结果测量方面的共识水平。

方法

为收集和汇总有见地的意见,一个专家小组——青年运动员髋关节研究协作组——通过在线德尔菲法对原发性凸轮形态定义、术语、分类法和影像学结果陈述进行评级,随后召开在线会议以探讨存在分歧和异议的领域。报告遵循《进行和报告德尔菲研究》。

结果

一个多样化且具包容性的德尔菲小组(第1轮和第2轮有65人,代表18个国家;6个利益相关者群体;40%为女性)在4个领域的47项陈述中的35项上达成了一致,同时揭示了存在分歧和异议的领域。该德尔菲小组就推动围绕原发性凸轮形态的研究和临床护理向前发展至关重要的四个关键问题达成了一致。他们达成一致的是:(1)定义,确认其概念属性(组织类型、大小、位置、形状和所属);(2)术语——使用“形态”,而非带有负面含义的术语,如“病变”“异常”或“畸形”;(3)分类法,区分原发性和继发性凸轮形态;(4)影像学结果,用于原发性凸轮形态病因学研究的股骨头 - 颈桡侧MRI上连续的骨/软骨α角。

结论

这一共识为运动员、患者、临床医生和研究人员提供了一个坚实的基础,以指导关于原发性凸轮形态及其自然史的更精确沟通、更好的临床决策和更具价值的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/f7f0dacd2bc5/bjsports-2022-106085f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/cecdc4ec6501/bjsports-2022-106085f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/13e08f856ff8/bjsports-2022-106085f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/7d3e4d71dd7a/bjsports-2022-106085f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/f7f0dacd2bc5/bjsports-2022-106085f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/cecdc4ec6501/bjsports-2022-106085f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/13e08f856ff8/bjsports-2022-106085f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/7d3e4d71dd7a/bjsports-2022-106085f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c03/9985727/f7f0dacd2bc5/bjsports-2022-106085f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 1-definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcomes.牛津关于原发性凸轮形态与股骨髋臼撞击综合征的共识:第1部分——定义、术语、分类及影像学结果
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Dec 6;57(6):325-41. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106085.
2
Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 2-research priorities on conditions affecting the young person's hip.牛津关于原发性凸轮形态与股骨髋臼撞击综合征的共识:第2部分——影响年轻人髋关节疾病的研究重点
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Dec 6;57(6):342-58. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106092.
3
Primary cam morphology; bump, burden or bog-standard? A concept analysis.主凸轮形态;凸起、负担还是标准?概念分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Nov;55(21):1212-1221. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103308. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Does the Capital Femoral Physis Bony MorphologyDiffer in Children with Symptomatic Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement.患有症状性凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症的儿童,其股骨头骺骨形态是否存在差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):922-931. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001602.
5
Twelve percent of hips with a primary cam deformity exhibit a slip-like morphology resembling sequelae of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.12%的原发性凸轮畸形髋关节呈现出类似股骨头骨骺滑脱后遗症的滑样形态。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1212-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4068-x.
6
Soft Tissue Cam Impingement in Adolescents: MRI Reveals Impingement Lesions Underappreciated on Radiographs.青少年软组织撞击征:MRI 显示 X 线片上易被漏诊的撞击病变。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Dec;51(14):3749-3755. doi: 10.1177/03635465231206815. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
7
The Lisbon Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement imaging-part 2: general issues, parameters, and reporting.《关于股骨髋臼撞击症影像学的里斯本协定》第 2 部分:一般问题、参数和报告。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4634-4651. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07432-1. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
8
What Is the Prevalence of Cam Deformity After Prophylactic Pinning of the Contralateral Asymptomatic Hip in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis? A 10-year Minimum Followup Study.预防性固定对侧无症状髋关节后凸轮畸形的发生率是多少?一项 10 年的最低随访研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1111-1122. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000592.
9
Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?Cam 型股骨髋臼撞击症的二维放射学测量中,哪些指标最能描述股骨近端的三维形态?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jan;477(1):242-253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000462.
10
The Lisbon Agreement on Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging-part 3: imaging techniques.《髋关节撞击综合征影像学协议-第 3 部分:影像学技术》。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4652-4668. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07501-5. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical recommendations on stretching exercise: A Delphi consensus statement of international research experts.拉伸运动实用建议:国际研究专家的德尔菲共识声明
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 Jun 11;14:101067. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101067.
2
Prevalence of Asymptomatic Hip Joint Abnormalities Among Adult Professional Soccer Players and Their Association With Age and Limb Dominance.成年职业足球运动员无症状髋关节异常的患病率及其与年龄和肢体优势的关系。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 16;7(1):101004. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101004. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Current understanding of articular cartilage lesions in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

本文引用的文献

1
A few panel members dominated guideline development meeting discussions: Social network analysis.少数专家组成员主导了指南制定会议的讨论:社会网络分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.023. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements.准备、开展和分析德尔菲调查:跨学科实践、新方向与进展
MethodsX. 2021 May 28;8:101401. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401. eCollection 2021.
3
Does the Type of Sport Influence Morphology of the Hip? A Systematic Review.
当前对股骨髋臼撞击综合征中关节软骨损伤的认识。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 30;19(1):886. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05322-6.
4
Overview for developing Delphi-based interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging: pros and cons.关于制定基于德尔菲法的影像学跨学科共识声明的概述:利弊
J Ultrason. 2024 Nov 8;24(97):1-6. doi: 10.15557/jou.2024.0015. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in middle-aged individuals is strongly associated with the development of hip osteoarthritis within 10-year follow-up: a prospective cohort study (CHECK).中年人群的股骨髋臼撞击综合征与 10 年随访内髋关节骨关节炎的发展密切相关:一项前瞻性队列研究(CHECK)。
Br J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 9;58(18):1061-1067. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108222.
6
Worker's compensation and no-fault insurance are associated with decreased patient reported outcomes and higher rates of revision at 2 and 5 years follow-up compared to patients with commercial insurance undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.与因股骨髋臼撞击症接受髋关节镜检查的商业保险患者相比,工伤赔偿保险和无过失保险的患者在2年和5年随访时报告的结果较差,翻修率较高。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jul;144(7):3175-3184. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05367-6. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
Consensus methods in patellofemoral pain: how rigorous are they? A scoping review.髌股疼痛共识方法:它们有多严谨? 范围综述。
Br J Sports Med. 2024 Jun 20;58(13):733-744. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107552.
8
ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) explanation and elaboration: Guidance and examples to support reporting consensus methods.ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) 解释和说明:支持报告共识方法的指南和示例。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 6;21(5):e1004390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004390. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Capsular attachment on the anterosuperior femoral head-neck junction: A hypothesis about femoroacetabular impingement.股骨头颈前上交界处囊状附着:髋关节撞击综合征的一种假说。
J Anat. 2024 Aug;245(2):231-239. doi: 10.1111/joa.14046. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
10
No difference in prevalence of postoperative iliopsoas tendinitis in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery when using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture for capsular closure.在关节镜下髋关节手术中,使用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线进行关节囊闭合时,术后髂腰肌肌腱炎的患病率无差异。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Apr;34(3):1419-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03818-1. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
运动类型是否会影响髋关节形态?系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6):1727-1741. doi: 10.1177/03635465211023500. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
4
Primary cam morphology; bump, burden or bog-standard? A concept analysis.主凸轮形态;凸起、负担还是标准?概念分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Nov;55(21):1212-1221. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103308. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
The Lisbon Agreement on Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging-part 3: imaging techniques.《髋关节撞击综合征影像学协议-第 3 部分:影像学技术》。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4652-4668. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07501-5. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
The Lisbon Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement imaging-part 2: general issues, parameters, and reporting.《关于股骨髋臼撞击症影像学的里斯本协定》第 2 部分:一般问题、参数和报告。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4634-4651. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07432-1. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
7
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value.循证研究系列论文 2:在开展新研究之前使用循证研究方法,以确保研究的价值。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
8
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?循证研究系列论文 1:什么是循证研究及其重要性?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
9
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 3: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion.循证研究系列论文 3:在完成研究后,采用循证研究方法将研究结果置于背景下,以确保结论的有用性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:167-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
10
Classifying Cam Morphology by the Alpha Angle: A Systematic Review on Threshold Values.通过阿尔法角对凸轮形态进行分类:阈值的系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Aug 10;8(8):2325967120938312. doi: 10.1177/2325967120938312. eCollection 2020 Aug.