Suppr超能文献

积极育儿方式与超越权威型的积极健康:自我、普遍主义价值观以及西班牙青少年和成年子女对情绪脆弱性的抵御

Positive parenting style and positive health beyond the authoritative: Self, universalism values, and protection against emotional vulnerability from Spanish adolescents and adult children.

作者信息

Palacios Iria, Garcia Oscar F, Alcaide Marta, Garcia Fernando

机构信息

Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Department of Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 16;13:1066282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066282. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recent research is fully questioning whether the combination of parenting warmth and strictness (the authoritative style) is always identified as positive parenting across the globe. This study analyzes parenting styles and the positive health of adolescents and adult children.

METHODS

The sample was 2,090 Spanish children (59.9% women), from four age groups: 600 adolescents, 591 young adults, 507 middle-aged adults, and 392 older adults. Parenting styles (indulgent, authoritative, authoritarian, and neglectful) were obtained by warmth and strictness measures. Children's positive health was measured by self (family self-concept, self-esteem, and negative self-efficacy), universalism values, and emotional vulnerability.

RESULTS

The main results showed that the indulgent parenting style was associated with equal and even better scores than the authoritative style, whereas the authoritarian and neglectful styles were consistently associated with low scores in positive health indicators for all age groups. However, two triple interactions of sex by age group by parenting style showed that women children from neglectful families reported the lowest family self-concept in old age and the highest emotional vulnerability in middle age.

DISCUSSION

The study findings question the universal benefits of the so-called positive parenting (the authoritative style) for positive health.

摘要

引言

近期的研究对育儿温暖与严格相结合(即权威型育儿方式)在全球范围内是否始终被视为积极的育儿方式提出了质疑。本研究分析了育儿方式与青少年及成年子女的积极健康状况。

方法

样本为2090名西班牙儿童(59.9%为女性),分为四个年龄组:600名青少年、591名青年、507名中年人和392名老年人。通过温暖和严格程度的测量来获取育儿方式(溺爱型、权威型、专制型和忽视型)。儿童的积极健康状况通过自我(家庭自我概念、自尊和消极自我效能感)、普遍主义价值观和情绪易感性来衡量。

结果

主要结果表明,溺爱型育儿方式与权威型育儿方式相比,得分相当甚至更高,而专制型和忽视型育儿方式在所有年龄组的积极健康指标上始终与低分相关。然而,性别、年龄组和育儿方式的两个三重交互作用表明,来自忽视型家庭的女性儿童在老年时家庭自我概念得分最低,在中年时情绪易感性得分最高。

讨论

研究结果对所谓的积极育儿(权威型育儿方式)对积极健康的普遍益处提出了质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f33/9800864/40af3fdcfe0f/fpsyg-13-1066282-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验