Calafat Amador, García Fernando, Juan Montse, Becoña Elisardo, Fernández-Hermida José Ramón
European Institute of Studies on Prevention (Irefrea), Rambla 15, 2° - 3(a), 07003 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 May 1;138:185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.705. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
This study examines whether authoritative parenting style (characterized by warmth and strictness) is more protective against adolescent substances use than authoritarian (strictness but not warmth), indulgent (warmth but not strictness) and neglectful (neither warmth nor strictness) parenting styles. Emergent research in diverse cultural contexts (mainly Southern European and Latin American countries) questions the fact that authoritative would always be the optimum parenting style.
Multi-factorial MANOVAs.
A sample of 7718 adolescents, 3774 males (48.9%), 11-19 year-olds (M=14.63 year-olds, SD=1.9 years) from Sweden, United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, Slovenia, and the Czech Republic.
Parenting style dimensions (warmth and strictness) and adolescent substance use (alcohol, tobacco, and illegal drugs); additionally another three adolescent outcomes were also measured (self-esteem, school performance and personal disturbances) all of them related in the literature with substance use.
Both indulgent and authoritative parenting styles were associated with better outcomes than authoritarian and neglectful parenting in all the countries studied. Overall, our results support the idea that in Europe the indulgent parenting style performs as well as the authoritative one since adolescents' scores in the youth outcomes were equal (on substance use and personal disturbances) or even better (on self esteem and school performance) than for authoritative parenting style.
Parenting styles relate to substance use and other outcomes in the same way in different countries explored. The so-called indulgent parenting style appears to be as good as the authoritative in protecting against substance abuse.
本研究探讨权威型育儿方式(以温情和严格为特征)是否比专制型(只有严格没有温情)、放任型(只有温情没有严格)和忽视型(既没有温情也没有严格)育儿方式更能预防青少年物质使用。不同文化背景(主要是南欧和拉丁美洲国家)的新兴研究对权威型总是最佳育儿方式这一观点提出了质疑。
多因素多变量方差分析。
来自瑞典、英国、西班牙、葡萄牙、斯洛文尼亚和捷克共和国的7718名青少年样本,其中3774名男性(48.9%),年龄在11至19岁之间(平均年龄=14.63岁,标准差=1.9岁)。
育儿方式维度(温情和严格)以及青少年物质使用情况(酒精、烟草和非法药物);此外,还测量了另外三个青少年相关结果(自尊、学业成绩和个人困扰),所有这些在文献中都与物质使用有关。
在所有研究的国家中,放任型和权威型育儿方式都比专制型和忽视型育儿方式带来更好的结果。总体而言,我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即在欧洲,放任型育儿方式与权威型育儿方式表现相当,因为青少年在青少年相关结果方面的得分(在物质使用和个人困扰方面)与权威型育儿方式相同,甚至在自尊和学业成绩方面比权威型育儿方式更好。
在不同国家,育儿方式与物质使用及其他结果的关联方式相同。所谓的放任型育儿方式在预防药物滥用方面似乎与权威型育儿方式一样有效。