• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

充气式电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管切除术联合腹腔镜手术的临床分析

[Clinical analysis of inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy combined with laparoscopy].

作者信息

Huang Z N, Liu C Q, Guo M F, Xu M Q, Sun X H, Wang G X, Xie M R

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 1;61(1):48-53. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220612-00265.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220612-00265
PMID:36603884
Abstract

To examine the safety and effectiveness of inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (IVMTE). Totally 269 patients admitted to the Anhui Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University who underwent IVMTE (IVMTE group, =47) or thoracoscopy combined with minimally invasive Mckeown esophageal cancer resection (MIME group, =222) from September 2017 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 31 males and 16 females in IVMTE group, aged (68.6±7.5) years (range: 54 to 87 years). There were 159 males and 63 females in MIME group, aged (66.8±8.8) years (range: 42 to 93 years). A 1∶1 match was performed on both groups by propensity score matching, with 38 cases in each group. The intraoperative conditions and postoperative complication rates of the two groups were compared by test, Wilcoxon rank, test, or Fisher exact probability method. Patients in IVMTE group had less intraoperative bleeding ((96.0±39.2) ml (123.8±49.3) ml, =-2.627, =0.011), shorter operation time ((239.1±47.3) minutes (264.2±57.2) minutes, =-2.086, =0.040), and less drainage 3 days after surgery (85(89) ml 675(573) ml, =-7.575, <0.01) compared with that of MIME group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of drainage tube-belt time, postoperative hospital stay, and lymph node dissection stations and numbers (all >0.05). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade 1 to 2 pulmonary infection (7.9%(3/38) 31.6%(12/38), ²=6.728, =0.009), total complications (21.1%(8/38) 47.4%(18/38), ²=5.846, =0.016) and total lung complications (13.2%(5/38) 42.1%(16/38), ²=7.962, =0.005) in the IVMTE group were significantly lower. Inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy combined with laparoscopic esophagectomy is safe and feasible, which can reach the same range of oncology as thoracoscopic surgery.

摘要

探讨充气式电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管切除术(IVMTE)的安全性和有效性。回顾性分析2017年9月至2021年12月在安徽医科大学附属安徽省立医院接受IVMTE(IVMTE组,n = 47)或胸腔镜联合微创McKeown食管癌切除术(MIME组,n = 222)的269例患者。IVMTE组男31例,女16例,年龄(68.6±7.5)岁(范围:54至87岁)。MIME组男159例,女63例,年龄(66.8±8.8)岁(范围:42至93岁)。通过倾向得分匹配对两组进行1∶1匹配,每组38例。采用t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法比较两组的术中情况和术后并发症发生率。IVMTE组患者术中出血量少于MIME组((96.0±39.2)ml比(123.8±49.3)ml,t = -2.627,P = 0.011),手术时间短于MIME组((239.1±47.3)分钟比(264.2±57.2)分钟,t = -2.086,P = 0.040),术后3天引流量少于MIME组(85(89)ml比675(573)ml,t = -7.575,P <0.01)。两组在引流管留置时间、术后住院时间以及淋巴结清扫站数和个数方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。IVMTE组Clavien-Dindo 1至2级肺部感染发生率(7.9%(3/38)比31.6%(12/38),χ² = 6.728,P = 0.009)、总并发症发生率(21.1%(8/38)比47.4%(18/38),χ² = 5.846,P = 0.016)和总肺部并发症发生率(13.2%(5/38)比42.1%(16/38),χ² = 7.962,P = 0.005)均显著低于MIME组。充气式电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管切除术联合腹腔镜食管切除术安全可行,肿瘤学切除范围与胸腔镜手术相当。

相似文献

1
[Clinical analysis of inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy combined with laparoscopy].充气式电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管切除术联合腹腔镜手术的临床分析
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 1;61(1):48-53. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220612-00265.
2
Study of the short-term quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer after inflatable videoassisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy.充气式电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管切除术后食管癌患者短期生活质量的研究
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:981576. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.981576. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparative study of acute and chronic pain after inflatable videoasisted MediastinoscopicTranshiatal esophagectomy and minimally invasive McKeown Esophagectomy:A propensity score matching analysis.充气式电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管切除术与微创麦基翁食管切除术后急慢性疼痛的比较研究:倾向评分匹配分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33477. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33477. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
4
Video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy combined with laparoscopy for esophageal cancer.电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管癌切除术联合腹腔镜治疗食管癌
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Dec 31;5:132. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-132.
5
Video-assisted mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.胸腔镜辅助经膈裂孔与腹腔镜联合食管切除术治疗食管癌。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4207-4214. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08754-x. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
6
[Clinical application and analysis of single-port laparoscopic and thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].单孔腹腔镜与胸腔镜McKeown食管癌切除术的临床应用与分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 3;101(29):2316-2321. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201215-03359.
7
Hybrid thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer - retrospective analysis and comparison with transhiatal resection.杂交胸腔镜食管癌切除术治疗癌症——回顾性分析及与经裂孔切除术的比较
Rozhl Chir. 2018 Spring;97(7):320-327.
8
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?癌症的微创食管切除术:腹腔镜经裂孔手术还是俯卧位胸腔镜手术继以腹腔镜手术?
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9697-7. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
9
Bilateral transcervical mediastinoscopic-assisted transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy compared with thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.双侧经颈纵隔镜辅助经口腹腔镜食管癌切除术与胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5746-5755. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11167-1. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
10
Retrospective Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: Pneumatic Mediastinoscopy Versus Thoracoscopy.两种微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的回顾性比较:充气纵隔镜检查术与胸腔镜检查术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 May;29(5):638-642. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0512. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Substitute or coexistence? Mediastinoscopy-assisted versus thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.替代还是共存?纵隔镜辅助与胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术:围手术期结局和长期生存的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 1;110(9):5802-5817. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001777.
2
Application of Inflatable Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopic Transhiatal Esophagectomy in Individualized Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.充气式电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管癌切除术在食管癌个体化治疗中的应用
Biomedicines. 2023 Oct 11;11(10):2750. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102750.