• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烘焙生产调度的建模与优化,以最小化最大完工时间和烤箱空闲时间。

Modeling and optimization of bakery production scheduling to minimize makespan and oven idle time.

机构信息

Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, Department of Process Analytics and Cereal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.

Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, Department of Process Engineering and Food Powders, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26866-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-26866-9
PMID:36604451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9816168/
Abstract

Makespan dominates the manufacturing expenses in bakery production. The high energy consumption of ovens also has a substantial impact, which bakers may overlook. Bakers leave ovens running until the final product is baked, allowing them to consume energy even when not in use. It results in energy waste, increased manufacturing costs, and CO emissions. This paper investigates three manufacturing lines from small and medium-sized bakeries to find optimum makespan and ovens' idle time (OIDT). A hybrid no-wait flow shop scheduling model considering the constraints that are most common in bakeries is proposed. To find optimal solutions, non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2), generalized differential evolution (GDE3), improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization (OMOPSO), and speed-constrained multi-objective particle swarm optimization (SMPSO) were used. The experimental results show that the shortest makespan does not always imply the lowest OIDT. Even the optimized solutions have up to 231 min of excess OIDT, while the makespan is the shortest. Pareto solutions provide promising trade-offs between makespan and OIDT, with the best-case scenario reducing OIDT by 1348 min while increasing makespan only by 61 min from the minimum possible makespan. NSGA-II outperforms all other algorithms in obtaining a high number of good-quality solutions and a small number of poor-quality solutions, followed by SPEA2 and GDE3. In contrast, OMOPSO and SMPSO deliver the worst solutions, which become pronounced as the problem complexity grows.

摘要

生产周期主导面包生产的制造成本。烤箱的高能耗也有很大的影响,而面包师可能会忽略这一点。面包师让烤箱一直运行,直到最后一个产品烘焙完成,即使烤箱不在使用时也会消耗能源。这导致了能源浪费、制造成本增加和 CO 排放。本文研究了三条来自中小型面包店的生产线,以找到最优的生产周期和烤箱空闲时间(OIDT)。提出了一种混合无等待流水车间调度模型,考虑了在面包店中最常见的约束条件。为了找到最优解,使用了非支配排序遗传算法(NSGA-II)、强度 Pareto 进化算法(SPEA2)、广义差分进化(GDE3)、改进多目标粒子群优化算法(OMOPSO)和速度约束多目标粒子群优化算法(SMPSO)。实验结果表明,最短的生产周期并不总是意味着最低的 OIDT。即使是优化后的解决方案也有高达 231 分钟的过度 OIDT,而生产周期是最短的。Pareto 解提供了生产周期和 OIDT 之间有希望的权衡,在从最小可能的生产周期增加 61 分钟的情况下,将 OIDT 减少 1348 分钟。NSGA-II 在获得大量高质量解和少量低质量解方面优于所有其他算法,其次是 SPEA2 和 GDE3。相比之下,OMOPSO 和 SMPSO 提供了最差的解决方案,随着问题复杂性的增加,这些解决方案变得更加明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/1fdbd62bad44/41598_2022_26866_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/65064b69f43e/41598_2022_26866_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/26704372d255/41598_2022_26866_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/05b79cff2750/41598_2022_26866_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/4f640462423f/41598_2022_26866_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/71c1183ab570/41598_2022_26866_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/db4987e38727/41598_2022_26866_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/9f82d5c2d478/41598_2022_26866_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/5b3480767915/41598_2022_26866_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/15c61e80487b/41598_2022_26866_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/347696118e24/41598_2022_26866_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/879b96dd96a5/41598_2022_26866_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/35bbaaf27f12/41598_2022_26866_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/0ebdc4d48cd7/41598_2022_26866_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/245bb58ab2f0/41598_2022_26866_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/66a1dd9fc67f/41598_2022_26866_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/eb2c02ce2408/41598_2022_26866_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/2d91b34e077d/41598_2022_26866_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/1fdbd62bad44/41598_2022_26866_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/65064b69f43e/41598_2022_26866_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/26704372d255/41598_2022_26866_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/05b79cff2750/41598_2022_26866_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/4f640462423f/41598_2022_26866_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/71c1183ab570/41598_2022_26866_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/db4987e38727/41598_2022_26866_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/9f82d5c2d478/41598_2022_26866_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/5b3480767915/41598_2022_26866_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/15c61e80487b/41598_2022_26866_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/347696118e24/41598_2022_26866_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/879b96dd96a5/41598_2022_26866_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/35bbaaf27f12/41598_2022_26866_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/0ebdc4d48cd7/41598_2022_26866_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/245bb58ab2f0/41598_2022_26866_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/66a1dd9fc67f/41598_2022_26866_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/eb2c02ce2408/41598_2022_26866_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/2d91b34e077d/41598_2022_26866_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9816168/1fdbd62bad44/41598_2022_26866_Fig18_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling and optimization of bakery production scheduling to minimize makespan and oven idle time.烘焙生产调度的建模与优化,以最小化最大完工时间和烤箱空闲时间。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26866-9.
2
Hybrid Pareto artificial bee colony algorithm for multi-objective single machine group scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times and learning effects.用于具有序列相关设置时间和学习效应的多目标单机分组调度问题的混合帕累托人工蜂群算法
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 17;5(1):1593. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3265-3. eCollection 2016.
3
Multiobjective particle swarm optimization with direction search and differential evolution for distributed flow-shop scheduling problem.基于方向搜索和差分进化的多目标粒子群优化算法求解分布式流水车间调度问题
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Jun 17;19(9):8833-8865. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022410.
4
A mathematical formulation and an NSGA-II algorithm for minimizing the makespan and energy cost under time-of-use electricity price in an unrelated parallel machine scheduling.一种用于在非相关并行机调度中基于分时电价最小化完工时间和能源成本的数学公式及NSGA-II算法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Feb 3;8:e844. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.844. eCollection 2022.
5
Minimizing the makespan and carbon emissions in the green flexible job shop scheduling problem with learning effects.最小化学习效应的绿色柔性作业车间调度问题的最大完工时间和碳排放。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 19;13(1):6369. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33615-z.
6
Multi-objective AGV scheduling in an FMS using a hybrid of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization.基于遗传算法和粒子群优化混合算法的柔性制造系统中多目标自动导引车调度
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 6;12(3):e0169817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169817. eCollection 2017.
7
Solving molecular docking problems with multi-objective metaheuristics.使用多目标元启发式算法解决分子对接问题。
Molecules. 2015 Jun 2;20(6):10154-83. doi: 10.3390/molecules200610154.
8
SONG: A Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Delay and Energy Aware Facility Location in Vehicular Fog Networks.宋:车载雾网络中基于延迟和能量感知的设施定位的多目标进化算法。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;23(2):667. doi: 10.3390/s23020667.
9
Cloud-Based Advanced Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm for Tasks Scheduling.基于云的高级混合蛙跳算法在任务调度中的应用
Big Data. 2024 Apr;12(2):110-126. doi: 10.1089/big.2022.0095. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
Cost versus life cycle assessment-based environmental impact optimization of drinking water production plants.基于成本与生命周期评估的饮用水生产厂环境影响优化
J Environ Manage. 2016 Jul 15;177:278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.027. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing infectious disease prediction model selection with multi-objective optimization: an empirical study.利用多目标优化改进传染病预测模型选择:一项实证研究
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Jul 29;10:e2217. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2217. eCollection 2024.