Virameteekul Sasivimol, Revesz Tamas, Jaunmuktane Zane, Warner Thomas T, De Pablo-Fernández Eduardo
Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Mov Disord. 2023 Mar;38(3):444-452. doi: 10.1002/mds.29304. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
The recent International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society diagnostic criteria for multiple system atrophy (MDS-MSA) have been developed to improve diagnostic accuracy although their diagnostic properties have not been evaluated.
The aims were to validate the MDS-MSA diagnostic criteria against neuropathological diagnosis and compare their diagnostic performance to previous criteria and diagnosis in clinical practice.
Consecutive patients with sporadic, progressive, adult-onset parkinsonism, or cerebellar ataxia from the Queen Square Brain Bank between 2009 and 2019 were selected and divided based on neuropathological diagnosis into MSA and non-MSA. Medical records were systematically reviewed, and clinical diagnosis was documented by retrospectively applying the MDS-MSA criteria, second consensus criteria, and diagnosis according to treating clinicians at early (within 3 years of symptom onset) and final stages. Diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value, and accuracy) were calculated using neuropathological diagnosis as gold standard and compared between different criteria.
Three hundred eighteen patients (103 MSA and 215 non-MSA) were included, comprising 248 patients with parkinsonism and 70 with cerebellar ataxia. Clinically probable MDS-MSA showed excellent sensitivity (95.1%), specificity (94.0%), and accuracy (94.3%), although their sensitivity at early stages was modest (62.1%). Clinically probable MDS-MSA outperformed diagnosis by clinicians and by second consensus criteria. Clinically established MDS-MSA showed perfect specificity (100%) even at early stages although to the detriment of low sensitivity. MDS-MSA diagnostic accuracy did not differ according to clinical presentation (ataxia vs. parkinsonism).
MDS-MSA criteria demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance against neuropathological diagnosis and are useful diagnostic tools for clinical practice and research. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
最近制定的国际帕金森病和运动障碍协会多系统萎缩诊断标准(MDS-MSA)旨在提高诊断准确性,但其诊断特性尚未得到评估。
旨在对照神经病理学诊断验证MDS-MSA诊断标准,并将其诊断性能与先前标准以及临床实践中的诊断进行比较。
选取2009年至2019年间来自女王广场脑库的连续性散发性、进行性、成年起病的帕金森综合征或小脑共济失调患者,并根据神经病理学诊断分为多系统萎缩组和非多系统萎缩组。系统回顾病历,并通过回顾性应用MDS-MSA标准、第二次共识标准以及根据治疗医生在疾病早期(症状出现3年内)和终末期的诊断来记录临床诊断。以神经病理学诊断为金标准计算诊断参数(敏感性、特异性、阳性/阴性预测值和准确性),并在不同标准之间进行比较。
共纳入318例患者(103例多系统萎缩患者和215例非多系统萎缩患者),其中包括248例帕金森综合征患者和70例小脑共济失调患者。临床很可能的MDS-MSA显示出优异的敏感性(95.1%)、特异性(94.0%)和准确性(94.3%),尽管其早期敏感性一般(62.1%)。临床很可能的MDS-MSA在诊断性能上优于医生诊断和第二次共识标准。临床确诊的MDS-MSA即使在早期也显示出完美的特异性(100%),尽管敏感性较低。MDS-MSA的诊断准确性在临床表现(共济失调与帕金森综合征)方面无差异。
MDS-MSA标准对照神经病理学诊断显示出优异的诊断性能,是临床实践和研究中有用的诊断工具。©2023国际帕金森病和运动障碍协会。