Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Tob Control. 2024 Mar 19;33(e1):e128-e131. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057697.
To examine the impact of menthol cigarette bans on use and purchasing of illicit cigarettes among menthol and non-menthol smokers in seven Canadian provinces.
Data from 1098 non-menthol smokers and 138 menthol smokers in Canada who completed the ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey in 2016 (pre-ban) and 2018 (post-ban). Brand validation analysis was conducted to (1) compare self-reported use of menthols versus actual use of menthols as regular brand, and verify self-reported purchasing of menthols among pre-ban menthol smokers at post-ban; and (2) assess pre-post ban changes in purchasing of illicit cigarettes from First Nations reserves among non-menthol smokers and menthol smokers.
Among the subset of 138 pre-ban menthol smokers, 36 (19.5%) reported smoking menthols at post-ban. Brand validation analyses showed that 19 (9.0%) were actually using a non-menthol brand; of the 17 (10.5%) who were actually using a menthol brand, 13 (7.9%) bought a menthol brand at last purchase, and 4 (2.6%) bought a non-menthol brand. Among the full sample of smokers who purchased cigarettes from First Nations reserves at both pre-ban and post-ban, there was no change in purchasing of menthols (n=9 menthol smokers; 51.2% vs 51.2%, p=1.00), non-menthols (n=1024 non-menthol smokers; 9.1% vs 8.7%, p=0.69) or all cigarettes (menthol+non-menthol) (n=1086 smokers; 9.7% vs 9.2%, p=0.56).
Actual rates of brand-verified menthol smoking were substantially lower than self-reported rates at post-ban. After Canada's menthol ban, there was no increase in illicit purchasing of menthol or non-menthol cigarettes from First Nations reserves.
在加拿大七个省份,调查薄荷烟禁令对薄荷烟和非薄荷烟吸烟者使用和购买非法香烟的影响。
2016 年(禁令前)和 2018 年(禁令后),1098 名非薄荷烟吸烟者和 138 名薄荷烟吸烟者参加了 ITC 四国吸烟和电子烟调查,我们对这些数据进行了分析。品牌验证分析包括:(1)比较自我报告的薄荷烟使用情况与实际使用的常规薄荷烟品牌,以及验证禁令前薄荷烟吸烟者在禁令后购买薄荷烟的情况;(2)评估非薄荷烟吸烟者和薄荷烟吸烟者从第一民族保留地购买非法香烟的情况在禁令前后的变化。
在 138 名禁令前薄荷烟吸烟者中,有 36 名(19.5%)在禁令后报告吸薄荷烟。品牌验证分析表明,实际上有 19 名(9.0%)吸的是薄荷烟品牌;在实际吸薄荷烟品牌的 17 名(10.5%)中,有 13 名(7.9%)在最近一次购买时购买的是薄荷烟品牌,有 4 名(2.6%)购买的是非薄荷烟品牌。在所有在禁令前后都从第一民族保留地购买香烟的吸烟者中,购买薄荷烟(9 名薄荷烟吸烟者;51.2%比 51.2%,p=1.00)、非薄荷烟(1024 名非薄荷烟吸烟者;9.1%比 8.7%,p=0.69)或所有香烟(薄荷烟+非薄荷烟)(1086 名吸烟者;9.7%比 9.2%,p=0.56)的比例均无变化。
禁令后实际的薄荷烟品牌验证吸烟率远低于自我报告率。在加拿大薄荷烟禁令实施后,从第一民族保留地购买非法薄荷烟或非薄荷烟的情况并没有增加。